D Marikova-Moodley betting stats, splits & projections
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 4 | 16 | 34 | 5.3 | 47.1 | 2.9 | 70.6 | LOW |
| overall | T20 | 202 | 202 | 13 | 6.0 | 15.5 | MEDIUM |
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
Bowling
| Portugal | T20 | 56 | 59 | 4 | 6.3 | 14.8 | LOW |
| Luxembourg | T20 | 48 | 31 | 5 | 3.9 | 6.2 | LOW |
| Belgium | T20 | 42 | 33 | 2 | 4.7 | 16.5 | LOW |
| Norway | T20 | 42 | 54 | 2 | 7.7 | 27.0 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
Bowling
| Scott Page Field, Vinor | T20 | 98 | 92 | 6 | 5.6 | 15.3 | LOW |
| Banks Field, Vinor | T20 | 90 | 85 | 7 | 5.7 | 12.1 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 4 | 16 | 34 | 5.3 | 47.1 | 2.9 | 70.6 | LOW |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 202 | 202 | 13 | 6.0 | 15.5 | MEDIUM |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
Bowling
| powerplay | T20 | 156 | 154 | 10 | 5.9 | 15.4 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 40 | 45 | 1 | 6.8 | 45.0 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.