£
ExclusiveFreeBets
.com

D Norotam betting stats, splits & projections

Batter

Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.

Record by format

Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.

overallT202467348028.0140.219.239.0HIGH

Why we like it

Splits where D Norotam scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.

  • Phase: powerplay (T20)HIGH sample

    521 runs off 331 balls in 24 T20 matches — strike rate 157.4 vs 140.2 overall, average 43.4 vs 28.0 overall.

  • Opposition: France (T20)LOW sample

    159 runs off 112 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 142.0 vs 140.2 overall, average 39.8 vs 28.0 overall.

  • Opposition: Belgium (T20)LOW sample

    112 runs off 74 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 151.4 vs 140.2 overall, average 37.3 vs 28.0 overall.

  • Opposition: Finland (T20)LOW sample

    99 runs off 63 balls in 2 T20 matches — strike rate 157.1 vs 140.2 overall, average 49.5 vs 28.0 overall.

  • Venue: Kerava National Cricket Ground (T20)LOW sample

    157 runs off 100 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 157.0 vs 140.2 overall, average 31.4 vs 28.0 overall.

  • Venue: Stars Arena Hofstade, Zemst (T20)LOW sample

    145 runs off 97 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 149.5 vs 140.2 overall, average 29.0 vs 28.0 overall.

Risks

Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.

  • Phase: middle (T20)MEDIUM sample

    133 runs off 133 balls in 12 T20 matches — strike rate 100.0 vs 140.2 overall, average 14.8 vs 28.0 overall.

  • Opposition: Norway (T20)LOW sample

    98 runs off 77 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 127.3 vs 140.2 overall, average 19.6 vs 28.0 overall.

  • Bowling type: UNKNOWN (T20)LOW sample

    94 runs off 81 balls in 7 T20 matches — strike rate 116.0 vs 140.2 overall, average 23.5 vs 28.0 overall.

Against each opponent

Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.

FranceT20415911239.8142.019.636.6LOW
NorwayT205987719.6127.315.641.6LOW
BelgiumT2031127437.3151.424.344.6LOW
FinlandT202996349.5157.117.530.2LOW
SwedenT203684722.7144.727.748.9LOW
IsraelT201464646.0100.06.532.6LOW

By venue

Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.

Santarem Cricket GroundT20925718928.6136.018.038.6MEDIUM
Kerava National Cricket GroundT20515710031.4157.020.033.0LOW
Stars Arena Hofstade, ZemstT2051459729.0149.522.743.3LOW
Botkyrka Cricket Center, StockholmT203684722.7144.727.748.9LOW
Tikkurila Cricket GroundT202464723.097.96.434.0LOW

By country

Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.

UnknownT202467348028.0140.219.239.0HIGH

By match phase

Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.

powerplayT202452133143.4157.424.539.0HIGH
middleT201213313314.8100.06.839.1MEDIUM

Against pace and spin

Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.

PACET202341428229.6146.821.639.7MEDIUM
SPINT201116511727.5141.017.936.8LOW
UNKNOWNT207948123.5116.012.339.5LOW

How these splits are used

The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.