D Padikkal betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 74 | 1797 | 1322 | 25.7 | 135.9 | 19.8 | 37.4 | HIGH |
| overall | TEST | 4 | 418 | 692 | 69.7 | 60.4 | 6.8 | 65.0 | HIGH |
| overall | TEST | 6 | 5 | 0 | 5.0 | — | LOW |
Why we like it
Splits where D Padikkal scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Venue: Galle International Stadium (TEST)HIGH sample
211 runs off 302 balls in 1 TEST match — strike rate 69.9 vs 60.4 overall, average 105.5 vs 69.7 overall.
- Opposition: Chennai Super Kings (T20)MEDIUM sample
279 runs off 189 balls in 9 T20 matches — strike rate 147.6 vs 135.9 overall, average 34.9 vs 25.7 overall.
- Opposition: Rajasthan Royals (T20)MEDIUM sample
227 runs off 133 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 170.7 vs 135.9 overall, average 56.8 vs 25.7 overall.
- Venue: Wankhede Stadium, Mumbai (T20)MEDIUM sample
327 runs off 224 balls in 10 T20 matches — strike rate 146.0 vs 135.9 overall, average 36.3 vs 25.7 overall.
- Venue: M Chinnaswamy Stadium, Bengaluru (T20)MEDIUM sample
324 runs off 204 balls in 11 T20 matches — strike rate 158.8 vs 135.9 overall, average 29.5 vs 25.7 overall.
- Venue: Himachal Pradesh Cricket Association Stadium, Dharamsala (T20)LOW sample
126 runs off 74 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 170.3 vs 135.9 overall, average 42.0 vs 25.7 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Opposition: Sunrisers Hyderabad (T20)MEDIUM sample
177 runs off 139 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 127.3 vs 135.9 overall, average 29.5 vs 25.7 overall.
- Opposition: Kolkata Knight Riders (T20)MEDIUM sample
143 runs off 125 balls in 7 T20 matches — strike rate 114.4 vs 135.9 overall, average 20.4 vs 25.7 overall.
- Bowling type: PACE (TEST)MEDIUM sample
84 runs off 164 balls in 4 TEST matches — strike rate 51.2 vs 60.4 overall, average 42.0 vs 69.7 overall.
- Opposition: Australia (TEST)LOW sample
25 runs off 94 balls in 1 TEST match — strike rate 26.6 vs 60.4 overall, average 12.5 vs 69.7 overall.
- Opposition: Royal Challengers Bangalore (T20)LOW sample
109 runs off 86 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 126.7 vs 135.9 overall, average 21.8 vs 25.7 overall.
- Opposition: Mumbai Indians (T20)LOW sample
73 runs off 63 balls in 7 T20 matches — strike rate 115.9 vs 135.9 overall, average 10.4 vs 25.7 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Sri Lanka | TEST | 2 | 328 | 495 | 109.3 | 66.3 | 6.9 | 60.2 | HIGH |
| Punjab Kings | T20 | 8 | 265 | 198 | 33.1 | 133.8 | 19.2 | 40.4 | MEDIUM |
| Chennai Super Kings | T20 | 9 | 279 | 189 | 34.9 | 147.6 | 19.6 | 30.2 | MEDIUM |
| Gujarat Titans | T20 | 11 | 205 | 152 | 18.6 | 134.9 | 20.4 | 42.1 | MEDIUM |
| Sunrisers Hyderabad | T20 | 6 | 177 | 139 | 29.5 | 127.3 | 18.7 | 38.8 | MEDIUM |
| Rajasthan Royals | T20 | 6 | 227 | 133 | 56.8 | 170.7 | 27.8 | 29.3 | MEDIUM |
| Kolkata Knight Riders | T20 | 7 | 143 | 125 | 20.4 | 114.4 | 15.2 | 36.0 | MEDIUM |
| Delhi Capitals | T20 | 9 | 175 | 122 | 21.9 | 143.4 | 23.0 | 40.2 | MEDIUM |
| Lucknow Super Giants | T20 | 5 | 138 | 104 | 27.6 | 132.7 | 20.2 | 37.5 | LOW |
| England | TEST | 1 | 65 | 103 | 65.0 | 63.1 | 10.7 | 70.9 | LOW |
| Australia | TEST | 1 | 25 | 94 | 12.5 | 26.6 | 2.1 | 84.0 | LOW |
| Royal Challengers Bangalore | T20 | 5 | 109 | 86 | 21.8 | 126.7 | 16.3 | 34.9 | LOW |
| Mumbai Indians | T20 | 7 | 73 | 63 | 10.4 | 115.9 | 17.5 | 50.8 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Galle International Stadium | TEST | 1 | 211 | 302 | 105.5 | 69.9 | 7.3 | 59.3 | HIGH |
| Wankhede Stadium, Mumbai | T20 | 10 | 327 | 224 | 36.3 | 146.0 | 21.9 | 34.8 | MEDIUM |
| M Chinnaswamy Stadium, Bengaluru | T20 | 11 | 324 | 204 | 29.5 | 158.8 | 23.0 | 28.4 | MEDIUM |
| Sinhalese Sports Club Ground, Colombo | TEST | 1 | 117 | 193 | 117.0 | 60.6 | 6.2 | 61.7 | MEDIUM |
| Sharjah Cricket Stadium | T20 | 3 | 131 | 106 | 43.7 | 123.6 | 15.1 | 34.9 | LOW |
| Himachal Pradesh Cricket Association Stadium, Dharamsala | TEST | 1 | 65 | 103 | 65.0 | 63.1 | 10.7 | 70.9 | LOW |
| MA Chidambaram Stadium, Chepauk, Chennai | T20 | 5 | 114 | 98 | 22.8 | 116.3 | 13.3 | 39.8 | LOW |
| Narendra Modi Stadium, Ahmedabad | T20 | 7 | 102 | 95 | 14.6 | 107.4 | 15.8 | 49.5 | LOW |
| Perth Stadium | TEST | 1 | 25 | 94 | 12.5 | 26.6 | 2.1 | 84.0 | LOW |
| Sawai Mansingh Stadium, Jaipur | T20 | 6 | 109 | 80 | 27.3 | 136.3 | 21.3 | 32.5 | LOW |
| Himachal Pradesh Cricket Association Stadium, Dharamsala | T20 | 3 | 126 | 74 | 42.0 | 170.3 | 27.0 | 31.1 | LOW |
| Zayed Cricket Stadium, Abu Dhabi | T20 | 2 | 63 | 72 | 31.5 | 87.5 | 9.7 | 48.6 | LOW |
| Dr DY Patil Sports Academy, Mumbai | T20 | 4 | 70 | 52 | 17.5 | 134.6 | 23.1 | 46.2 | LOW |
| Brabourne Stadium, Mumbai | T20 | 3 | 66 | 45 | 22.0 | 146.7 | 24.4 | 40.0 | LOW |
| Bharat Ratna Shri Atal Bihari Vajpayee Ekana Cricket Stadium, Lucknow | T20 | 4 | 53 | 44 | 13.3 | 120.5 | 15.9 | 43.2 | LOW |
| Shaheed Veer Narayan Singh International Stadium, Raipur | T20 | 2 | 51 | 38 | 25.5 | 134.2 | 23.7 | 39.5 | LOW |
| Maharashtra Cricket Association Stadium, Pune | T20 | 2 | 48 | 36 | 24.0 | 133.3 | 19.4 | 44.4 | LOW |
| Maharaja Yadavindra Singh International Cricket Stadium, Mullanpur | T20 | 1 | 61 | 35 | 61.0 | 174.3 | 28.6 | 37.1 | LOW |
| Barsapara Cricket Stadium, Guwahati | T20 | 2 | 35 | 33 | 17.5 | 106.1 | 12.1 | 36.4 | LOW |
| Eden Gardens, Kolkata | T20 | 2 | 38 | 30 | 19.0 | 126.7 | 16.7 | 36.7 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 71 | 1666 | 1216 | 24.9 | 137.0 | 20.2 | 37.6 | HIGH |
| Unknown | TEST | 4 | 418 | 692 | 69.7 | 60.4 | 6.8 | 65.0 | HIGH |
| United Arab Emirates | T20 | 3 | 131 | 106 | 43.7 | 123.6 | 15.1 | 34.9 | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 46 | 867 | 644 | 24.8 | 134.6 | 16.8 | 30.6 | HIGH |
| powerplay | T20 | 58 | 803 | 593 | 30.9 | 135.4 | 22.6 | 45.5 | HIGH |
| old_ball | TEST | 4 | 340 | 570 | 68.0 | 59.6 | 6.3 | 64.7 | HIGH |
| new_ball | TEST | 3 | 78 | 122 | 78.0 | 63.9 | 9.0 | 66.4 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 12 | 127 | 85 | 14.1 | 149.4 | 23.5 | 31.8 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 72 | 1184 | 846 | 24.7 | 140.0 | 22.2 | 40.5 | HIGH |
| SPIN | T20 | 50 | 490 | 372 | 27.2 | 131.7 | 15.6 | 29.3 | HIGH |
| SPIN | TEST | 4 | 159 | 271 | 79.5 | 58.7 | 5.5 | 63.1 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | TEST | 3 | 175 | 257 | 87.5 | 68.1 | 7.8 | 61.5 | MEDIUM |
| PACE | TEST | 4 | 84 | 164 | 42.0 | 51.2 | 7.3 | 73.8 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 17 | 123 | 104 | 30.8 | 118.3 | 15.4 | 40.4 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.