Dhruv Jurel betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | TEST | 11 | 632 | 1077 | 42.1 | 58.7 | 6.9 | 69.1 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 54 | 1207 | 798 | 30.9 | 151.3 | 20.2 | 30.7 | HIGH |
| overall | TEST | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1.0 | — | LOW |
Why we like it
Splits where Dhruv Jurel scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)HIGH sample
695 runs off 425 balls in 49 T20 matches — strike rate 163.5 vs 151.3 overall, average 27.8 vs 30.9 overall.
- Opposition: Sri Lanka (TEST)MEDIUM sample
173 runs off 258 balls in 2 TEST matches — strike rate 67.1 vs 58.7 overall, average 86.5 vs 42.1 overall.
- Opposition: Sunrisers Hyderabad (T20)MEDIUM sample
228 runs off 131 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 174.0 vs 151.3 overall, average 45.6 vs 30.9 overall.
- Bowling type: UNKNOWN (TEST)MEDIUM sample
105 runs off 126 balls in 3 TEST matches — strike rate 83.3 vs 58.7 overall, not yet dismissed vs 42.1 overall.
- Phase: death (T20)MEDIUM sample
487 runs off 283 balls in 30 T20 matches — strike rate 172.1 vs 151.3 overall, average 30.4 vs 30.9 overall.
- Opposition: Gujarat Titans (T20)LOW sample
138 runs off 80 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 172.5 vs 151.3 overall, average 23.0 vs 30.9 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Phase: middle (T20)HIGH sample
568 runs off 421 balls in 36 T20 matches — strike rate 134.9 vs 151.3 overall, average 29.9 vs 30.9 overall.
- Bowling type: PACE (TEST)MEDIUM sample
151 runs off 262 balls in 10 TEST matches — strike rate 57.6 vs 58.7 overall, average 25.2 vs 42.1 overall.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)MEDIUM sample
315 runs off 257 balls in 36 T20 matches — strike rate 122.6 vs 151.3 overall, average 26.3 vs 30.9 overall.
- Opposition: South Africa (TEST)LOW sample
29 runs off 62 balls in 2 TEST matches — strike rate 46.8 vs 58.7 overall, average 7.3 vs 42.1 overall.
- Venue: Saurashtra Cricket Association Stadium, Rajkot (TEST)LOW sample
46 runs off 104 balls in 1 TEST match — strike rate 44.2 vs 58.7 overall, average 46.0 vs 42.1 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| England | TEST | 4 | 243 | 437 | 48.6 | 55.6 | 5.7 | 69.3 | HIGH |
| West Indies | TEST | 2 | 175 | 295 | 87.5 | 59.3 | 8.1 | 70.8 | MEDIUM |
| Sri Lanka | TEST | 2 | 173 | 258 | 86.5 | 67.1 | 6.6 | 61.6 | MEDIUM |
| Sunrisers Hyderabad | T20 | 6 | 228 | 131 | 45.6 | 174.0 | 28.2 | 33.6 | MEDIUM |
| Royal Challengers Bengaluru | T20 | 5 | 173 | 111 | 86.5 | 155.9 | 19.8 | 24.3 | LOW |
| Delhi Capitals | T20 | 5 | 149 | 102 | 37.3 | 146.1 | 17.6 | 24.5 | LOW |
| Lucknow Super Giants | T20 | 6 | 131 | 91 | 65.5 | 144.0 | 16.5 | 29.7 | LOW |
| Punjab Kings | T20 | 7 | 130 | 87 | 32.5 | 149.4 | 18.4 | 29.9 | LOW |
| Gujarat Titans | T20 | 6 | 138 | 80 | 23.0 | 172.5 | 25.0 | 32.5 | LOW |
| Chennai Super Kings | T20 | 6 | 118 | 67 | 29.5 | 176.1 | 25.4 | 26.9 | LOW |
| South Africa | TEST | 2 | 29 | 62 | 7.3 | 46.8 | 9.7 | 83.9 | LOW |
| Mumbai Indians | T20 | 4 | 53 | 43 | 13.3 | 123.3 | 14.0 | 34.9 | LOW |
| Kolkata Knight Riders | T20 | 4 | 40 | 40 | 10.0 | 100.0 | 12.5 | 42.5 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Sawai Mansingh Stadium, Jaipur | T20 | 15 | 361 | 241 | 36.1 | 149.8 | 19.5 | 30.7 | MEDIUM |
| JSCA International Stadium Complex, Ranchi | TEST | 1 | 129 | 224 | 129.0 | 57.6 | 5.4 | 66.5 | MEDIUM |
| Narendra Modi Stadium, Ahmedabad | TEST | 1 | 125 | 210 | 125.0 | 59.5 | 8.6 | 72.4 | MEDIUM |
| Sinhalese Sports Club Ground, Colombo | TEST | 1 | 115 | 175 | — | 65.7 | 6.3 | 62.3 | MEDIUM |
| Barsapara Cricket Stadium, Guwahati | T20 | 8 | 177 | 109 | 35.4 | 162.4 | 23.9 | 24.8 | LOW |
| Saurashtra Cricket Association Stadium, Rajkot | TEST | 1 | 46 | 104 | 46.0 | 44.2 | 4.8 | 78.8 | LOW |
| Arun Jaitley Stadium, Delhi | TEST | 1 | 50 | 85 | 50.0 | 58.8 | 7.1 | 67.1 | LOW |
| Kennington Oval, London | TEST | 1 | 53 | 85 | 26.5 | 62.4 | 7.1 | 67.1 | LOW |
| Galle International Stadium | TEST | 1 | 58 | 83 | 29.0 | 69.9 | 7.2 | 60.2 | LOW |
| Arun Jaitley Stadium, Delhi | T20 | 3 | 110 | 69 | 55.0 | 159.4 | 20.3 | 27.5 | LOW |
| MA Chidambaram Stadium, Chepauk, Chennai | T20 | 4 | 92 | 64 | 30.7 | 143.8 | 18.8 | 29.7 | LOW |
| Narendra Modi Stadium, Ahmedabad | T20 | 4 | 106 | 64 | 35.3 | 165.6 | 23.4 | 29.7 | LOW |
| M Chinnaswamy Stadium, Bengaluru | T20 | 2 | 81 | 50 | 81.0 | 162.0 | 20.0 | 28.0 | LOW |
| Eden Gardens, Kolkata | TEST | 1 | 27 | 48 | 13.5 | 56.3 | 12.5 | 81.3 | LOW |
| Maharaja Yadavindra Singh International Cricket Stadium, New Chandigarh | T20 | 3 | 73 | 47 | 24.3 | 155.3 | 21.3 | 31.9 | LOW |
| Rajiv Gandhi International Stadium, Uppal, Hyderabad | T20 | 3 | 71 | 40 | 23.7 | 177.5 | 27.5 | 37.5 | LOW |
| Bharat Ratna Shri Atal Bihari Vajpayee Ekana Cricket Stadium, Lucknow | T20 | 2 | 52 | 35 | 52.0 | 148.6 | 20.0 | 31.4 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | TEST | 11 | 632 | 1077 | 42.1 | 58.7 | 6.9 | 69.1 | HIGH |
| Unknown | T20 | 53 | 1201 | 784 | 31.6 | 153.2 | 20.4 | 30.0 | HIGH |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| old_ball | TEST | 11 | 555 | 939 | 37.0 | 59.1 | 7.0 | 69.5 | HIGH |
| middle | T20 | 36 | 568 | 421 | 29.9 | 134.9 | 17.6 | 33.3 | HIGH |
| death | T20 | 30 | 487 | 283 | 30.4 | 172.1 | 21.6 | 22.6 | MEDIUM |
| new_ball | TEST | 6 | 77 | 138 | — | 55.8 | 5.8 | 65.9 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 15 | 152 | 94 | 38.0 | 161.7 | 27.7 | 43.6 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| SPIN | TEST | 11 | 376 | 689 | 41.8 | 54.6 | 6.2 | 71.3 | HIGH |
| PACE | T20 | 49 | 695 | 425 | 27.8 | 163.5 | 23.1 | 30.4 | HIGH |
| PACE | TEST | 10 | 151 | 262 | 25.2 | 57.6 | 6.9 | 70.2 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | T20 | 36 | 315 | 257 | 26.3 | 122.6 | 13.2 | 33.1 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | TEST | 3 | 105 | 126 | — | 83.3 | 10.3 | 54.8 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 17 | 197 | 116 | 98.5 | 169.8 | 25.0 | 26.7 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.