DM Gondaria betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 21 | 514 | 376 | 25.7 | 136.7 | 19.1 | 40.2 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 221 | 237 | 18 | 6.4 | 13.2 | MEDIUM |
Why we like it
Splits where DM Gondaria scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)MEDIUM sample
317 runs off 223 balls in 21 T20 matches — strike rate 142.2 vs 136.7 overall, average 35.2 vs 25.7 overall.
- Opposition: Bahrain (T20)LOW sample
96 runs off 61 balls in 2 T20 matches — strike rate 157.4 vs 136.7 overall, average 48.0 vs 25.7 overall.
- Venue: Gymkhana Club Ground, Nairobi (T20)LOW sample
100 runs off 65 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 153.8 vs 136.7 overall, average 33.3 vs 25.7 overall.
- Venue: Botswana Cricket Association Oval 2, Gaborone (T20)LOW sample
127 runs off 62 balls in 2 T20 matches — strike rate 204.8 vs 136.7 overall, average 63.5 vs 25.7 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Venue: Harare Sports Club (T20)LOW sample
72 runs off 67 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 107.5 vs 136.7 overall, average 24.0 vs 25.7 overall.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)LOW sample
107 runs off 85 balls in 9 T20 matches — strike rate 125.9 vs 136.7 overall, average 17.8 vs 25.7 overall.
- Phase: middle (T20)LOW sample
122 runs off 96 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 127.1 vs 136.7 overall, average 30.5 vs 25.7 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Bahrain | T20 | 2 | 96 | 61 | 48.0 | 157.4 | 21.3 | 29.5 | LOW |
| Tanzania | T20 | 1 | 60 | 53 | 60.0 | 113.2 | 13.2 | 37.7 | LOW |
| Rwanda | T20 | 2 | 54 | 41 | 27.0 | 131.7 | 19.5 | 43.9 | LOW |
| Mali | T20 | 1 | 92 | 34 | 92.0 | 270.6 | 41.2 | 17.6 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Harare Sports Club | T20 | 3 | 72 | 67 | 24.0 | 107.5 | 13.4 | 41.8 | LOW |
| Gymkhana Club Ground, Nairobi | T20 | 3 | 100 | 65 | 33.3 | 153.8 | 21.5 | 32.3 | LOW |
| Botswana Cricket Association Oval 2, Gaborone | T20 | 2 | 127 | 62 | 63.5 | 204.8 | 30.6 | 30.6 | LOW |
| Entebbe Cricket Oval | T20 | 4 | 62 | 57 | 15.5 | 108.8 | 12.3 | 49.1 | LOW |
| Gahanga B Ground, Rwanda | T20 | 2 | 67 | 49 | 33.5 | 136.7 | 20.4 | 42.9 | LOW |
Bowling
| Harare Sports Club | T20 | 60 | 53 | 5 | 5.3 | 10.6 | LOW |
| Entebbe Cricket Oval | T20 | 53 | 62 | 3 | 7.0 | 20.7 | LOW |
| Botswana Cricket Association Oval 2, Gaborone | T20 | 42 | 41 | 5 | 5.9 | 8.2 | LOW |
| Takashinga Sports Club, Highfield, Harare | T20 | 42 | 46 | 1 | 6.6 | 46.0 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 18 | 442 | 309 | 26.0 | 143.0 | 20.4 | 39.8 | HIGH |
| Zimbabwe | T20 | 3 | 72 | 67 | 24.0 | 107.5 | 13.4 | 41.8 | LOW |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 161 | 184 | 13 | 6.9 | 14.2 | MEDIUM |
| Zimbabwe | T20 | 60 | 53 | 5 | 5.3 | 10.6 | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| powerplay | T20 | 21 | 367 | 265 | 26.2 | 138.5 | 21.9 | 44.5 | MEDIUM |
| middle | T20 | 6 | 122 | 96 | 30.5 | 127.1 | 12.5 | 31.3 | LOW |
Bowling
| middle | T20 | 155 | 164 | 9 | 6.3 | 18.2 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 36 | 36 | 3 | 6.0 | 12.0 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 21 | 317 | 223 | 35.2 | 142.2 | 21.1 | 41.3 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | T20 | 9 | 107 | 85 | 17.8 | 125.9 | 15.3 | 42.4 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 9 | 90 | 68 | 18.0 | 132.4 | 17.6 | 33.8 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.