DS Bajwa betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 19 | 432 | 339 | 28.8 | 127.4 | 16.5 | 39.5 | HIGH |
| overall | ODI | 6 | 74 | 118 | 12.3 | 62.7 | 7.6 | 67.8 | LOW |
| overall | T20 | 60 | 102 | 2 | 10.2 | 51.0 | LOW |
| overall | ODI | 24 | 26 | 1 | 6.5 | 26.0 | LOW |
Why we like it
Splits where DS Bajwa scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)MEDIUM sample
275 runs off 192 balls in 18 T20 matches — strike rate 143.2 vs 127.4 overall, average 30.6 vs 28.8 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)MEDIUM sample
253 runs off 182 balls in 15 T20 matches — strike rate 139.0 vs 127.4 overall, average 42.2 vs 28.8 overall.
- Opposition: United States of America (T20)LOW sample
156 runs off 119 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 131.1 vs 127.4 overall, average 39.0 vs 28.8 overall.
- Venue: Maple Leaf North-West Ground, King City (T20)LOW sample
144 runs off 90 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 160.0 vs 127.4 overall, average 48.0 vs 28.8 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Phase: middle (T20)MEDIUM sample
119 runs off 125 balls in 10 T20 matches — strike rate 95.2 vs 127.4 overall, average 17.0 vs 28.8 overall.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)LOW sample
111 runs off 112 balls in 12 T20 matches — strike rate 99.1 vs 127.4 overall, average 22.2 vs 28.8 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| United States of America | T20 | 5 | 156 | 119 | 39.0 | 131.1 | 18.5 | 38.7 | LOW |
| Netherlands | ODI | 2 | 45 | 71 | 22.5 | 63.4 | 7.0 | 64.8 | LOW |
| Bahamas | T20 | 2 | 86 | 47 | 86.0 | 183.0 | 23.4 | 23.4 | LOW |
| Nepal | T20 | 2 | 39 | 39 | 39.0 | 100.0 | 10.3 | 43.6 | LOW |
| New Zealand | T20 | 1 | 36 | 39 | 36.0 | 92.3 | 10.3 | 41.0 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Maple Leaf North-West Ground, King City | T20 | 6 | 144 | 90 | 48.0 | 160.0 | 21.1 | 33.3 | LOW |
| Prairie View Cricket Complex | T20 | 3 | 89 | 73 | 44.5 | 121.9 | 16.4 | 41.1 | LOW |
| Sportpark Westvliet, The Hague | ODI | 2 | 27 | 54 | 13.5 | 50.0 | 3.7 | 70.4 | LOW |
| Hazelaarweg, Rotterdam | ODI | 2 | 28 | 43 | 14.0 | 65.1 | 9.3 | 67.4 | LOW |
| Sportpark Westvliet, The Hague | T20 | 1 | 56 | 41 | 56.0 | 136.6 | 19.5 | 34.1 | LOW |
| MA Chidambaram Stadium, Chepauk, Chennai | T20 | 1 | 36 | 39 | 36.0 | 92.3 | 10.3 | 41.0 | LOW |
| Maple Leaf North-East Ground, King City | T20 | 1 | 50 | 33 | 50.0 | 151.5 | 15.2 | 30.3 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 19 | 432 | 339 | 28.8 | 127.4 | 16.5 | 39.5 | HIGH |
| Unknown | ODI | 6 | 74 | 118 | 12.3 | 62.7 | 7.6 | 67.8 | LOW |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 60 | 102 | 2 | 10.2 | 51.0 | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| powerplay | T20 | 15 | 253 | 182 | 42.2 | 139.0 | 19.8 | 41.8 | MEDIUM |
| middle | T20 | 10 | 119 | 125 | 17.0 | 95.2 | 8.8 | 38.4 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | ODI | 3 | 48 | 73 | 48.0 | 65.8 | 8.2 | 67.1 | LOW |
| middle | ODI | 5 | 26 | 45 | 5.2 | 57.8 | 6.7 | 68.9 | LOW |
| death | T20 | 3 | 60 | 32 | 30.0 | 187.5 | 28.1 | 31.3 | LOW |
Bowling
| middle | T20 | 36 | 58 | 1 | 9.7 | 58.0 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 18 | 275 | 192 | 30.6 | 143.2 | 21.4 | 39.1 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | T20 | 12 | 111 | 112 | 22.2 | 99.1 | 8.0 | 40.2 | LOW |
| PACE | ODI | 3 | 43 | 72 | 21.5 | 59.7 | 6.9 | 68.1 | LOW |
| SPIN | ODI | 5 | 31 | 46 | 7.8 | 67.4 | 8.7 | 67.4 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 7 | 46 | 35 | 46.0 | 131.4 | 17.1 | 40.0 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.