E Iloku betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 48 | 653 | 907 | 16.7 | 72.0 | 7.1 | 55.1 | HIGH |
Why we like it
Splits where E Iloku scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Opposition: Namibia (T20)MEDIUM sample
244 runs off 299 balls in 14 T20 matches — strike rate 81.6 vs 72.0 overall, average 20.3 vs 16.7 overall.
- Venue: High Performance Oval, Windhoek (T20)MEDIUM sample
221 runs off 242 balls in 11 T20 matches — strike rate 91.3 vs 72.0 overall, average 24.6 vs 16.7 overall.
- Venue: Namibia Cricket Ground, Windhoek (T20)MEDIUM sample
112 runs off 121 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 92.6 vs 72.0 overall, average 28.0 vs 16.7 overall.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)MEDIUM sample
255 runs off 299 balls in 30 T20 matches — strike rate 85.3 vs 72.0 overall, average 17.0 vs 16.7 overall.
- Phase: death (T20)LOW sample
80 runs off 72 balls in 8 T20 matches — strike rate 111.1 vs 72.0 overall, average 20.0 vs 16.7 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)HIGH sample
348 runs off 550 balls in 42 T20 matches — strike rate 63.3 vs 72.0 overall, average 17.4 vs 16.7 overall.
- Bowling type: UNKNOWN (T20)MEDIUM sample
109 runs off 184 balls in 21 T20 matches — strike rate 59.2 vs 72.0 overall, average 15.6 vs 16.7 overall.
- Venue: Gahanga International Cricket Stadium. Rwanda (T20)LOW sample
55 runs off 108 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 50.9 vs 72.0 overall, average 13.8 vs 16.7 overall.
- Venue: Terdthai Cricket Ground, Bangkok (T20)LOW sample
36 runs off 69 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 52.2 vs 72.0 overall, average 9.0 vs 16.7 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Namibia | T20 | 14 | 244 | 299 | 20.3 | 81.6 | 9.0 | 53.2 | MEDIUM |
| Tanzania | T20 | 5 | 143 | 180 | 47.7 | 79.4 | 7.8 | 49.4 | MEDIUM |
| Rwanda | T20 | 3 | 33 | 49 | 16.5 | 67.3 | 8.2 | 63.3 | LOW |
| Kenya | T20 | 2 | 25 | 47 | 12.5 | 53.2 | 6.4 | 68.1 | LOW |
| Canada | T20 | 5 | 27 | 37 | 6.8 | 73.0 | 5.4 | 54.1 | LOW |
| Scotland | T20 | 1 | 24 | 33 | 24.0 | 72.7 | 6.1 | 51.5 | LOW |
| Nigeria | T20 | 2 | 16 | 32 | 8.0 | 50.0 | 3.1 | 59.4 | LOW |
| South Africa | T20 | 1 | 19 | 32 | 19.0 | 59.4 | 3.1 | 53.1 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| High Performance Oval, Windhoek | T20 | 11 | 221 | 242 | 24.6 | 91.3 | 10.7 | 48.3 | MEDIUM |
| Namibia Cricket Ground, Windhoek | T20 | 6 | 112 | 121 | 28.0 | 92.6 | 10.7 | 45.5 | MEDIUM |
| Gahanga International Cricket Stadium. Rwanda | T20 | 4 | 55 | 108 | 13.8 | 50.9 | 1.9 | 57.4 | LOW |
| Entebbe Cricket Oval | T20 | 5 | 66 | 95 | 13.2 | 69.5 | 6.3 | 60.0 | LOW |
| Terdthai Cricket Ground, Bangkok | T20 | 4 | 36 | 69 | 9.0 | 52.2 | 2.9 | 60.9 | LOW |
| Asian Institute of Technology Ground, Bangkok | T20 | 3 | 44 | 67 | 22.0 | 65.7 | 9.0 | 61.2 | LOW |
| Gahanga B Ground, Rwanda | T20 | 4 | 52 | 66 | 52.0 | 78.8 | 7.6 | 53.0 | LOW |
| Achimota Senior Secondary School A Field, Accra | T20 | 3 | 24 | 48 | 8.0 | 50.0 | 2.1 | 56.3 | LOW |
| Lugogo Cricket Oval, Kampala | T20 | 5 | 27 | 37 | 6.8 | 73.0 | 5.4 | 54.1 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 48 | 653 | 907 | 16.7 | 72.0 | 7.1 | 55.1 | HIGH |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| powerplay | T20 | 42 | 348 | 550 | 17.4 | 63.3 | 7.1 | 62.2 | HIGH |
| middle | T20 | 23 | 225 | 285 | 15.0 | 78.9 | 6.0 | 46.3 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 8 | 80 | 72 | 20.0 | 111.1 | 11.1 | 36.1 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 42 | 289 | 424 | 17.0 | 68.2 | 5.9 | 54.7 | HIGH |
| SPIN | T20 | 30 | 255 | 299 | 17.0 | 85.3 | 10.4 | 52.2 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 21 | 109 | 184 | 15.6 | 59.2 | 4.3 | 60.9 | MEDIUM |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.