E Kamara betting stats, splits & projections
All-rounder
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 29 | 468 | 560 | 27.5 | 83.6 | 7.9 | 49.5 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 450 | 403 | 23 | 5.4 | 17.5 | HIGH |
Why we like it
Splits where E Kamara scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Venue: Botswana Cricket Association Oval 1, Gaborone (T20)HIGH sample
267 runs off 309 balls in 12 T20 matches — strike rate 86.4 vs 83.6 overall, average 44.5 vs 27.5 overall.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)HIGH sample
320 runs off 379 balls in 28 T20 matches — strike rate 84.4 vs 83.6 overall, average 40.0 vs 27.5 overall.
- Opposition: Eswatini (T20)LOW sample
118 runs off 105 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 112.4 vs 83.6 overall, average 59.0 vs 27.5 overall.
- Opposition: Mozambique (T20)LOW sample
73 runs off 74 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 98.6 vs 83.6 overall, average 24.3 vs 27.5 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Opposition: Botswana (T20)MEDIUM sample
107 runs off 158 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 67.7 vs 83.6 overall, average 53.5 vs 27.5 overall.
- Bowling type: UNKNOWN (T20)MEDIUM sample
119 runs off 148 balls in 16 T20 matches — strike rate 80.4 vs 83.6 overall, average 17.0 vs 27.5 overall.
- Phase: middle (T20)MEDIUM sample
111 runs off 168 balls in 13 T20 matches — strike rate 66.1 vs 83.6 overall, average 15.9 vs 27.5 overall.
- Venue: Gahanga International Cricket Stadium. Rwanda (T20)LOW sample
43 runs off 65 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 66.2 vs 83.6 overall, not yet dismissed vs 27.5 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Botswana | T20 | 5 | 107 | 158 | 53.5 | 67.7 | 5.1 | 52.5 | MEDIUM |
| Eswatini | T20 | 4 | 118 | 105 | 59.0 | 112.4 | 9.5 | 38.1 | LOW |
| Nigeria | T20 | 3 | 86 | 97 | 86.0 | 88.7 | 8.2 | 43.3 | LOW |
| Mozambique | T20 | 4 | 73 | 74 | 24.3 | 98.6 | 12.2 | 50.0 | LOW |
| Namibia | T20 | 1 | 24 | 33 | 24.0 | 72.7 | 12.1 | 66.7 | LOW |
| Rwanda | T20 | 3 | 17 | 32 | 8.5 | 53.1 | 3.1 | 59.4 | LOW |
Bowling
| Botswana | T20 | 102 | 86 | 7 | 5.1 | 12.3 | LOW |
| Rwanda | T20 | 72 | 74 | 2 | 6.2 | 37.0 | LOW |
| Mozambique | T20 | 60 | 33 | 4 | 3.3 | 8.3 | LOW |
| Nigeria | T20 | 54 | 69 | 1 | 7.7 | 69.0 | LOW |
| Eswatini | T20 | 48 | 18 | 3 | 2.3 | 6.0 | LOW |
| Malawi | T20 | 48 | 25 | 4 | 3.1 | 6.3 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Botswana Cricket Association Oval 1, Gaborone | T20 | 12 | 267 | 309 | 44.5 | 86.4 | 8.1 | 47.6 | HIGH |
| Botswana Cricket Association Oval 2, Gaborone | T20 | 5 | 68 | 75 | 22.7 | 90.7 | 6.7 | 46.7 | LOW |
| Gahanga International Cricket Stadium. Rwanda | T20 | 3 | 43 | 65 | — | 66.2 | 4.6 | 55.4 | LOW |
| High Performance Oval, Windhoek | T20 | 3 | 40 | 53 | 20.0 | 75.5 | 11.3 | 60.4 | LOW |
| Namibia Cricket Ground, Windhoek | T20 | 2 | 40 | 35 | 20.0 | 114.3 | 11.4 | 25.7 | LOW |
Bowling
| Botswana Cricket Association Oval 1, Gaborone | T20 | 204 | 144 | 9 | 4.2 | 16.0 | MEDIUM |
| Gahanga International Cricket Stadium. Rwanda | T20 | 72 | 88 | 4 | 7.3 | 22.0 | LOW |
| High Performance Oval, Windhoek | T20 | 60 | 83 | 1 | 8.3 | 83.0 | LOW |
| Botswana Cricket Association Oval 2, Gaborone | T20 | 54 | 28 | 5 | 3.1 | 5.6 | LOW |
| Gahanga B Ground, Rwanda | T20 | 42 | 26 | 4 | 3.7 | 6.5 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 29 | 468 | 560 | 27.5 | 83.6 | 7.9 | 49.5 | HIGH |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 450 | 403 | 23 | 5.4 | 17.5 | HIGH |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| powerplay | T20 | 28 | 283 | 337 | 35.4 | 84.0 | 8.3 | 49.3 | HIGH |
| middle | T20 | 13 | 111 | 168 | 15.9 | 66.1 | 4.2 | 54.2 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 4 | 74 | 55 | 37.0 | 134.5 | 16.4 | 36.4 | LOW |
Bowling
| middle | T20 | 276 | 246 | 12 | 5.3 | 20.5 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 96 | 95 | 7 | 5.9 | 13.6 | LOW |
| powerplay | T20 | 78 | 62 | 4 | 4.8 | 15.5 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 28 | 320 | 379 | 40.0 | 84.4 | 7.7 | 49.3 | HIGH |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 16 | 119 | 148 | 17.0 | 80.4 | 8.1 | 50.0 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | T20 | 6 | 29 | 33 | 14.5 | 87.9 | 9.1 | 48.5 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.