E Van Zyl betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 41 | 323 | 445 | 9.5 | 72.6 | 6.1 | 54.4 | HIGH |
Why we like it
Splits where E Van Zyl scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Opposition: Zimbabwe (T20)LOW sample
95 runs off 105 balls in 7 T20 matches — strike rate 90.5 vs 72.6 overall, average 19.0 vs 9.5 overall.
- Phase: death (T20)LOW sample
115 runs off 118 balls in 18 T20 matches — strike rate 97.5 vs 72.6 overall, average 8.8 vs 9.5 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)MEDIUM sample
64 runs off 125 balls in 15 T20 matches — strike rate 51.2 vs 72.6 overall, average 9.1 vs 9.5 overall.
- Venue: Entebbe Cricket Oval (T20)LOW sample
49 runs off 79 balls in 7 T20 matches — strike rate 62.0 vs 72.6 overall, average 7.0 vs 9.5 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Zimbabwe | T20 | 7 | 95 | 105 | 19.0 | 90.5 | 7.6 | 47.6 | LOW |
| Uganda | T20 | 7 | 63 | 86 | 10.5 | 73.3 | 2.3 | 47.7 | LOW |
| Thailand | T20 | 3 | 18 | 42 | 6.0 | 42.9 | 2.4 | 71.4 | LOW |
| Netherlands | T20 | 4 | 19 | 41 | 6.3 | 46.3 | 2.4 | 58.5 | LOW |
| United Arab Emirates | T20 | 6 | 29 | 41 | 4.8 | 70.7 | 9.8 | 65.9 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Entebbe Cricket Oval | T20 | 7 | 49 | 79 | 7.0 | 62.0 | 6.3 | 65.8 | LOW |
| Wanderers Cricket Ground, Windhoek | T20 | 5 | 53 | 66 | 13.3 | 80.3 | 7.6 | 50.0 | LOW |
| Centre for Cricket Development Ground, Windhoek | T20 | 4 | 60 | 53 | 20.0 | 113.2 | 11.3 | 47.2 | LOW |
| Mission Road Ground, Mong Kok, Hong Kong | T20 | 4 | 27 | 44 | 9.0 | 61.4 | 6.8 | 63.6 | LOW |
| Asian Institute of Technology Ground, Bangkok | T20 | 3 | 28 | 43 | 9.3 | 65.1 | 9.3 | 62.8 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 41 | 323 | 445 | 9.5 | 72.6 | 6.1 | 54.4 | HIGH |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 23 | 144 | 202 | 10.3 | 71.3 | 4.0 | 51.5 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 15 | 64 | 125 | 9.1 | 51.2 | 7.2 | 69.6 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 18 | 115 | 118 | 8.8 | 97.5 | 8.5 | 43.2 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| SPIN | T20 | 34 | 161 | 233 | 8.1 | 69.1 | 4.3 | 54.1 | MEDIUM |
| PACE | T20 | 28 | 123 | 157 | 11.2 | 78.3 | 9.6 | 57.3 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 10 | 39 | 55 | 13.0 | 70.9 | 3.6 | 47.3 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.