EAS Ferrary betting stats, splits & projections
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 10 | 154 | 163 | 17.1 | 94.5 | 8.6 | 47.9 | MEDIUM |
| overall | T20 | 207 | 155 | 17 | 4.5 | 9.1 | MEDIUM |
Why we like it
Splits where EAS Ferrary scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Opposition: Czech Republic (T20)LOW sample
108 runs off 100 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 108.0 vs 94.5 overall, average 36.0 vs 17.1 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)LOW sample
87 runs off 102 balls in 10 T20 matches — strike rate 85.3 vs 94.5 overall, average 10.9 vs 17.1 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Czech Republic | T20 | 3 | 108 | 100 | 36.0 | 108.0 | 10.0 | 45.0 | LOW |
Bowling
| Czech Republic | T20 | 66 | 37 | 5 | 3.4 | 7.4 | LOW |
| Croatia | T20 | 48 | 39 | 5 | 4.9 | 7.8 | LOW |
| Estonia | T20 | 45 | 16 | 6 | 2.1 | 2.7 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Scott Page Field, Vinor | T20 | 5 | 113 | 117 | 22.6 | 96.6 | 8.5 | 48.7 | LOW |
| Europa Sports Complex | T20 | 5 | 41 | 46 | 10.3 | 89.1 | 8.7 | 45.7 | LOW |
Bowling
| Scott Page Field, Vinor | T20 | 138 | 107 | 11 | 4.7 | 9.7 | LOW |
| Europa Sports Complex | T20 | 69 | 48 | 6 | 4.2 | 8.0 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 10 | 154 | 163 | 17.1 | 94.5 | 8.6 | 47.9 | MEDIUM |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 207 | 155 | 17 | 4.5 | 9.1 | MEDIUM |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 8 | 108 | 121 | 21.6 | 89.3 | 7.4 | 48.8 | MEDIUM |
Bowling
| powerplay | T20 | 162 | 126 | 12 | 4.7 | 10.5 | MEDIUM |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 10 | 87 | 102 | 10.9 | 85.3 | 8.8 | 53.9 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 4 | 63 | 57 | 63.0 | 110.5 | 8.8 | 40.4 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.