F Overdijk betting stats, splits & projections
All-rounder
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 50 | 395 | 462 | 11.0 | 85.5 | 6.7 | 42.6 | HIGH |
| overall | ODI | 13 | 224 | 456 | 22.4 | 49.1 | 3.3 | 64.7 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 533 | 585 | 31 | 6.6 | 18.9 | HIGH |
| overall | ODI | 288 | 252 | 9 | 5.3 | 28.0 | MEDIUM |
Why we like it
Splits where F Overdijk scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Phase: death (T20)MEDIUM sample
219 runs off 200 balls in 28 T20 matches — strike rate 109.5 vs 85.5 overall, average 12.2 vs 11.0 overall.
- Opposition: Scotland (T20)LOW sample
62 runs off 65 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 95.4 vs 85.5 overall, average 15.5 vs 11.0 overall.
- Venue: Hazelaarweg, Rotterdam (T20)LOW sample
84 runs off 69 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 121.7 vs 85.5 overall, average 21.0 vs 11.0 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Opposition: Thailand (ODI)MEDIUM sample
61 runs off 129 balls in 6 ODI matches — strike rate 47.3 vs 49.1 overall, average 12.2 vs 22.4 overall.
- Phase: middle (T20)MEDIUM sample
170 runs off 245 balls in 37 T20 matches — strike rate 69.4 vs 85.5 overall, average 10.6 vs 11.0 overall.
- Opposition: Thailand (T20)LOW sample
58 runs off 90 balls in 10 T20 matches — strike rate 64.4 vs 85.5 overall, average 8.3 vs 11.0 overall.
- Opposition: Ireland (T20)LOW sample
45 runs off 76 balls in 7 T20 matches — strike rate 59.2 vs 85.5 overall, average 6.4 vs 11.0 overall.
- Venue: Royal Chiangmai Golf Club (ODI)LOW sample
37 runs off 72 balls in 4 ODI matches — strike rate 51.4 vs 49.1 overall, average 9.3 vs 22.4 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Ireland | ODI | 3 | 86 | 156 | 86.0 | 55.1 | 3.8 | 59.6 | MEDIUM |
| Thailand | ODI | 6 | 61 | 129 | 12.2 | 47.3 | 3.1 | 66.7 | MEDIUM |
| Scotland | ODI | 2 | 51 | 111 | 25.5 | 45.9 | 3.6 | 69.4 | LOW |
| Thailand | T20 | 10 | 58 | 90 | 8.3 | 64.4 | 2.2 | 48.9 | LOW |
| Ireland | T20 | 7 | 45 | 76 | 6.4 | 59.2 | 3.9 | 57.9 | LOW |
| Scotland | T20 | 5 | 62 | 65 | 15.5 | 95.4 | 10.8 | 36.9 | LOW |
| Papua New Guinea | ODI | 2 | 26 | 60 | 13.0 | 43.3 | 1.7 | 65.0 | LOW |
| Germany | T20 | 2 | 52 | 35 | 52.0 | 148.6 | 17.1 | 20.0 | LOW |
| Jersey | T20 | 2 | 30 | 35 | 15.0 | 85.7 | 2.9 | 37.1 | LOW |
Bowling
| Thailand | ODI | 162 | 128 | 6 | 4.7 | 21.3 | MEDIUM |
| Ireland | ODI | 84 | 81 | 3 | 5.8 | 27.0 | LOW |
| Hong Kong | T20 | 78 | 55 | 5 | 4.2 | 11.0 | LOW |
| Namibia | T20 | 62 | 44 | 9 | 4.3 | 4.9 | LOW |
| Scotland | T20 | 48 | 57 | 3 | 7.1 | 19.0 | LOW |
| Bangladesh | T20 | 42 | 47 | 1 | 6.7 | 47.0 | LOW |
| Ireland | T20 | 42 | 86 | 0 | 12.3 | — | LOW |
| Thailand | T20 | 37 | 44 | 2 | 7.1 | 22.0 | LOW |
| Zimbabwe | T20 | 36 | 37 | 2 | 6.2 | 18.5 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| VRA Ground, Amstelveen | ODI | 7 | 124 | 259 | 24.8 | 47.9 | 3.5 | 67.2 | MEDIUM |
| Sportpark Maarschalkerweerd, Utrecht | T20 | 8 | 85 | 94 | 17.0 | 90.4 | 5.3 | 39.4 | LOW |
| Sportpark Westvliet, The Hague | ODI | 1 | 47 | 88 | — | 53.4 | 1.1 | 53.4 | LOW |
| Royal Chiangmai Golf Club | ODI | 4 | 37 | 72 | 9.3 | 51.4 | 5.6 | 68.1 | LOW |
| Hazelaarweg, Rotterdam | T20 | 6 | 84 | 69 | 21.0 | 121.7 | 13.0 | 31.9 | LOW |
| Royal Chiangmai Golf Club | T20 | 3 | 28 | 44 | 14.0 | 63.6 | 2.3 | 50.0 | LOW |
| Mulpani Cricket Ground | T20 | 3 | 17 | 39 | 5.7 | 43.6 | 2.6 | 64.1 | LOW |
| Tribhuvan University International Cricket Ground, Kirtipur | T20 | 6 | 39 | 39 | 7.8 | 100.0 | 7.7 | 28.2 | LOW |
| VRA Ground, Amstelveen | T20 | 4 | 27 | 39 | 6.8 | 69.2 | 5.1 | 48.7 | LOW |
| Sportpark Maarschalkerweerd, Utrecht | ODI | 1 | 16 | 37 | 16.0 | 43.2 | 2.7 | 67.6 | LOW |
Bowling
| VRA Ground, Amstelveen | ODI | 132 | 126 | 4 | 5.7 | 31.5 | LOW |
| Royal Chiangmai Golf Club | ODI | 120 | 96 | 4 | 4.8 | 24.0 | LOW |
| Terdthai Cricket Ground, Bangkok | T20 | 98 | 106 | 8 | 6.5 | 13.3 | LOW |
| Sportpark Maarschalkerweerd, Utrecht | T20 | 96 | 78 | 6 | 4.9 | 13.0 | LOW |
| Tribhuvan University International Cricket Ground, Kirtipur | T20 | 72 | 93 | 2 | 7.8 | 46.5 | LOW |
| Mulpani Cricket Ground | T20 | 42 | 58 | 0 | 8.3 | — | LOW |
| Sportpark Westvliet, Voorburg | T20 | 42 | 26 | 5 | 3.7 | 5.2 | LOW |
| Asian Institute of Technology Ground, Bangkok | T20 | 38 | 27 | 4 | 4.3 | 6.8 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 50 | 395 | 462 | 11.0 | 85.5 | 6.7 | 42.6 | HIGH |
| Unknown | ODI | 13 | 224 | 456 | 22.4 | 49.1 | 3.3 | 64.7 | HIGH |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 533 | 585 | 31 | 6.6 | 18.9 | HIGH |
| Unknown | ODI | 288 | 252 | 9 | 5.3 | 28.0 | MEDIUM |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | ODI | 13 | 202 | 411 | 25.3 | 49.1 | 3.4 | 65.0 | HIGH |
| middle | T20 | 37 | 170 | 245 | 10.6 | 69.4 | 4.5 | 48.2 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 28 | 219 | 200 | 12.2 | 109.5 | 10.0 | 33.0 | MEDIUM |
| death | ODI | 3 | 22 | 41 | 11.0 | 53.7 | 2.4 | 58.5 | LOW |
Bowling
| middle | T20 | 246 | 299 | 10 | 7.3 | 29.9 | MEDIUM |
| middle | ODI | 180 | 168 | 4 | 5.6 | 42.0 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 144 | 155 | 9 | 6.5 | 17.2 | LOW |
| death | T20 | 143 | 131 | 12 | 5.5 | 10.9 | LOW |
| powerplay | ODI | 84 | 55 | 2 | 3.9 | 27.5 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| SPIN | ODI | 13 | 189 | 375 | 27.0 | 50.4 | 3.7 | 64.5 | HIGH |
| SPIN | T20 | 40 | 240 | 302 | 10.9 | 79.5 | 5.3 | 43.4 | HIGH |
| PACE | T20 | 27 | 132 | 142 | 10.2 | 93.0 | 9.2 | 43.0 | MEDIUM |
| PACE | ODI | 6 | 34 | 77 | 17.0 | 44.2 | 1.3 | 64.9 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.