F Sisifo betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 16 | 174 | 287 | 15.8 | 60.6 | 5.2 | 62.0 | MEDIUM |
| overall | T20 | 36 | 54 | 1 | 9.0 | 54.0 | LOW |
Why we like it
Splits where F Sisifo scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)MEDIUM sample
96 runs off 154 balls in 12 T20 matches — strike rate 62.3 vs 60.6 overall, average 24.0 vs 15.8 overall.
- Venue: N'Du Stadium, Noumea, New Caledonia (T20)LOW sample
66 runs off 94 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 70.2 vs 60.6 overall, average 66.0 vs 15.8 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Venue: Amini Park, Port Moresby (T20)LOW sample
30 runs off 62 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 48.4 vs 60.6 overall, average 10.0 vs 15.8 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Vanuatu | T20 | 5 | 75 | 131 | 25.0 | 57.3 | 2.3 | 60.3 | MEDIUM |
| Papua New Guinea | T20 | 4 | 18 | 35 | 6.0 | 51.4 | 5.7 | 74.3 | LOW |
| Indonesia | T20 | 1 | 18 | 33 | 18.0 | 54.5 | 3.0 | 54.5 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| N'Du Stadium, Noumea, New Caledonia | T20 | 3 | 66 | 94 | 66.0 | 70.2 | 5.3 | 54.3 | LOW |
| Amini Park, Port Moresby | T20 | 4 | 30 | 62 | 10.0 | 48.4 | 1.6 | 67.7 | LOW |
| Vanuatu Cricket Ground (Oval 2) | T20 | 2 | 19 | 45 | 9.5 | 42.2 | 2.2 | 64.4 | LOW |
| Albert Park 2, Suva | T20 | 2 | 17 | 38 | 8.5 | 44.7 | 5.3 | 76.3 | LOW |
| Albert Park 1, Suva | T20 | 3 | 26 | 36 | 13.0 | 72.2 | 11.1 | 58.3 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 16 | 174 | 287 | 15.8 | 60.6 | 5.2 | 62.0 | MEDIUM |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 36 | 54 | 1 | 9.0 | 54.0 | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| powerplay | T20 | 10 | 80 | 131 | 20.0 | 61.1 | 6.9 | 65.6 | MEDIUM |
| middle | T20 | 8 | 64 | 119 | 16.0 | 53.8 | 1.7 | 60.5 | LOW |
| death | T20 | 5 | 30 | 37 | 10.0 | 81.1 | 10.8 | 54.1 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 12 | 96 | 154 | 24.0 | 62.3 | 5.8 | 63.0 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | T20 | 8 | 49 | 89 | 9.8 | 55.1 | 2.2 | 59.6 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 7 | 29 | 44 | 14.5 | 65.9 | 9.1 | 63.6 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.