Faraaz Mehti Abbas betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 21 | 418 | 388 | 20.9 | 107.7 | 11.9 | 43.3 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 71 | 88 | 2 | 7.4 | 44.0 | LOW |
Why we like it
Splits where Faraaz Mehti Abbas scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)MEDIUM sample
181 runs off 153 balls in 18 T20 matches — strike rate 118.3 vs 107.7 overall, average 22.6 vs 20.9 overall.
- Opposition: Cyprus (T20)LOW sample
109 runs off 83 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 131.3 vs 107.7 overall, average 36.3 vs 20.9 overall.
- Venue: Happy Valley Ground (T20)LOW sample
109 runs off 83 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 131.3 vs 107.7 overall, average 36.3 vs 20.9 overall.
- Venue: Botkyrka Cricket Center, Stockholm (T20)LOW sample
97 runs off 81 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 119.8 vs 107.7 overall, average 24.3 vs 20.9 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)MEDIUM sample
177 runs off 180 balls in 18 T20 matches — strike rate 98.3 vs 107.7 overall, average 19.7 vs 20.9 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)MEDIUM sample
144 runs off 146 balls in 16 T20 matches — strike rate 98.6 vs 107.7 overall, average 48.0 vs 20.9 overall.
- Venue: Kerava National Cricket Ground (T20)LOW sample
77 runs off 96 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 80.2 vs 107.7 overall, average 15.4 vs 20.9 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Cyprus | T20 | 4 | 109 | 83 | 36.3 | 131.3 | 16.9 | 37.3 | LOW |
| Sweden | T20 | 3 | 61 | 56 | 20.3 | 108.9 | 17.9 | 51.8 | LOW |
| Portugal | T20 | 2 | 41 | 45 | 20.5 | 91.1 | 8.9 | 44.4 | LOW |
| Norway | T20 | 3 | 44 | 44 | 14.7 | 100.0 | 11.4 | 50.0 | LOW |
| Germany | T20 | 2 | 23 | 34 | 11.5 | 67.6 | 2.9 | 47.1 | LOW |
| Luxembourg | T20 | 1 | 38 | 33 | 38.0 | 115.2 | 6.1 | 30.3 | LOW |
| Estonia | T20 | 2 | 29 | 30 | 14.5 | 96.7 | 6.7 | 43.3 | LOW |
Bowling
| Cyprus | T20 | 42 | 35 | 1 | 5.0 | 35.0 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Kerava National Cricket Ground | T20 | 5 | 77 | 96 | 15.4 | 80.2 | 6.3 | 46.9 | LOW |
| Happy Valley Ground | T20 | 4 | 109 | 83 | 36.3 | 131.3 | 16.9 | 37.3 | LOW |
| Botkyrka Cricket Center, Stockholm | T20 | 4 | 97 | 81 | 24.3 | 119.8 | 18.5 | 48.1 | LOW |
| Tikkurila Cricket Ground | T20 | 2 | 70 | 52 | 35.0 | 134.6 | 11.5 | 30.8 | LOW |
| Ishoj Cricket Club, Vejledalen | T20 | 4 | 36 | 46 | 9.0 | 78.3 | 6.5 | 52.2 | LOW |
| Estonian National Cricket and Rugby Field | T20 | 2 | 29 | 30 | 14.5 | 96.7 | 6.7 | 43.3 | LOW |
Bowling
| Happy Valley Ground | T20 | 42 | 35 | 1 | 5.0 | 35.0 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 21 | 418 | 388 | 20.9 | 107.7 | 11.9 | 43.3 | HIGH |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 71 | 88 | 2 | 7.4 | 44.0 | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 18 | 269 | 237 | 16.8 | 113.5 | 11.0 | 39.7 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 16 | 144 | 146 | 48.0 | 98.6 | 13.7 | 49.3 | MEDIUM |
Bowling
| middle | T20 | 43 | 48 | 0 | 6.7 | — | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 18 | 177 | 180 | 19.7 | 98.3 | 11.7 | 48.3 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | T20 | 18 | 181 | 153 | 22.6 | 118.3 | 11.8 | 38.6 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 9 | 60 | 55 | 20.0 | 109.1 | 12.7 | 40.0 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.