Festus Benn betting stats, splits & projections
Bowler
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 24 | 275 | 360 | 17.2 | 76.4 | 8.1 | 55.8 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 441 | 460 | 31 | 6.3 | 14.8 | HIGH |
Why we like it
Splits where Festus Benn scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Venue: Belgrano Athletic Club Ground, Buenos Aires (T20)LOW sample
65 runs off 70 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 92.9 vs 76.4 overall, average 32.5 vs 17.2 overall.
- Venue: Maple Leaf North-West Ground, King City (T20)LOW sample
56 runs off 61 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 91.8 vs 76.4 overall, average 18.7 vs 17.2 overall.
- Phase: death (T20)LOW sample
96 runs off 84 balls in 9 T20 matches — strike rate 114.3 vs 76.4 overall, average 48.0 vs 17.2 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Phase: middle (T20)MEDIUM sample
116 runs off 176 balls in 16 T20 matches — strike rate 65.9 vs 76.4 overall, average 14.5 vs 17.2 overall.
- Opposition: Bermuda (T20)LOW sample
62 runs off 91 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 68.1 vs 76.4 overall, average 12.4 vs 17.2 overall.
- Venue: Jimmy Powell Oval, Cayman Islands (T20)LOW sample
54 runs off 83 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 65.1 vs 76.4 overall, average 18.0 vs 17.2 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)LOW sample
63 runs off 100 balls in 12 T20 matches — strike rate 63.0 vs 76.4 overall, average 10.5 vs 17.2 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Cayman Islands | T20 | 4 | 103 | 126 | 103.0 | 81.7 | 7.9 | 49.2 | MEDIUM |
| Bermuda | T20 | 6 | 62 | 91 | 12.4 | 68.1 | 7.7 | 62.6 | LOW |
| Panama | T20 | 3 | 34 | 50 | 17.0 | 68.0 | 8.0 | 64.0 | LOW |
Bowling
| Cayman Islands | T20 | 108 | 121 | 4 | 6.7 | 30.3 | LOW |
| Bermuda | T20 | 83 | 132 | 5 | 9.5 | 26.4 | LOW |
| Panama | T20 | 49 | 49 | 5 | 6.0 | 9.8 | LOW |
| Belize | T20 | 48 | 26 | 3 | 3.3 | 8.7 | LOW |
| Argentina | T20 | 42 | 34 | 3 | 4.9 | 11.3 | LOW |
| Brazil | T20 | 42 | 30 | 5 | 4.3 | 6.0 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Jimmy Powell Oval, Cayman Islands | T20 | 4 | 54 | 83 | 18.0 | 65.1 | 7.2 | 63.9 | LOW |
| Belgrano Athletic Club Ground, Buenos Aires | T20 | 3 | 65 | 70 | 32.5 | 92.9 | 12.9 | 51.4 | LOW |
| Maple Leaf North-West Ground, King City | T20 | 4 | 56 | 61 | 18.7 | 91.8 | 9.8 | 50.8 | LOW |
| White Hill Field, Sandys Parish | T20 | 4 | 29 | 45 | 14.5 | 64.4 | 6.7 | 66.7 | LOW |
| Hurlingham Club Ground, Buenos Aires | T20 | 4 | 34 | 42 | 17.0 | 81.0 | 7.1 | 52.4 | LOW |
| St Albans Club, Buenos Aires | T20 | 3 | 20 | 35 | 10.0 | 57.1 | 0.0 | 48.6 | LOW |
Bowling
| Maple Leaf North-West Ground, King City | T20 | 71 | 80 | 6 | 6.8 | 13.3 | LOW |
| Hurlingham Club Ground, Buenos Aires | T20 | 67 | 59 | 7 | 5.3 | 8.4 | LOW |
| St Albans Club, Buenos Aires | T20 | 66 | 56 | 4 | 5.1 | 14.0 | LOW |
| White Hill Field, Sandys Parish | T20 | 66 | 55 | 5 | 5.0 | 11.0 | LOW |
| Belgrano Athletic Club Ground, Buenos Aires | T20 | 57 | 77 | 3 | 8.1 | 25.7 | LOW |
| Jimmy Powell Oval, Cayman Islands | T20 | 48 | 74 | 0 | 9.3 | — | LOW |
| St George's College Ground, Buenos Aires | T20 | 42 | 19 | 5 | 2.7 | 3.8 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 24 | 275 | 360 | 17.2 | 76.4 | 8.1 | 55.8 | HIGH |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 441 | 460 | 31 | 6.3 | 14.8 | HIGH |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 16 | 116 | 176 | 14.5 | 65.9 | 6.3 | 58.5 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 12 | 63 | 100 | 10.5 | 63.0 | 7.0 | 66.0 | LOW |
| death | T20 | 9 | 96 | 84 | 48.0 | 114.3 | 13.1 | 38.1 | LOW |
Bowling
| middle | T20 | 293 | 288 | 15 | 5.9 | 19.2 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 106 | 104 | 13 | 5.9 | 8.0 | LOW |
| powerplay | T20 | 42 | 68 | 3 | 9.7 | 22.7 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| SPIN | T20 | 16 | 140 | 196 | 17.5 | 71.4 | 7.7 | 56.6 | MEDIUM |
| PACE | T20 | 19 | 88 | 111 | 14.7 | 79.3 | 8.1 | 56.8 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 11 | 47 | 53 | 23.5 | 88.7 | 9.4 | 50.9 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.