Fiza betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 31 | 590 | 622 | 24.6 | 94.9 | 9.6 | 44.1 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 228 | 198 | 15 | 5.2 | 13.2 | MEDIUM |
Why we like it
Splits where Fiza scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Venue: Al Amerat Cricket Ground Oman Cricket (Ministry Turf 2) (T20)MEDIUM sample
226 runs off 216 balls in 8 T20 matches — strike rate 104.6 vs 94.9 overall, average 32.3 vs 24.6 overall.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)MEDIUM sample
243 runs off 233 balls in 23 T20 matches — strike rate 104.3 vs 94.9 overall, average 27.0 vs 24.6 overall.
- Bowling type: UNKNOWN (T20)MEDIUM sample
187 runs off 161 balls in 17 T20 matches — strike rate 116.1 vs 94.9 overall, average 46.8 vs 24.6 overall.
- Opposition: Denmark (T20)LOW sample
101 runs off 79 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 127.8 vs 94.9 overall, average 33.7 vs 24.6 overall.
- Opposition: Bahrain (T20)LOW sample
86 runs off 77 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 111.7 vs 94.9 overall, average 21.5 vs 24.6 overall.
- Opposition: Saudi Arabia (T20)LOW sample
115 runs off 77 balls in 2 T20 matches — strike rate 149.4 vs 94.9 overall, not yet dismissed vs 24.6 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Opposition: United Arab Emirates (T20)MEDIUM sample
72 runs off 131 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 55.0 vs 94.9 overall, average 14.4 vs 24.6 overall.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)MEDIUM sample
160 runs off 228 balls in 20 T20 matches — strike rate 70.2 vs 94.9 overall, average 14.5 vs 24.6 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)MEDIUM sample
167 runs off 222 balls in 24 T20 matches — strike rate 75.2 vs 94.9 overall, average 20.9 vs 24.6 overall.
- Opposition: Kuwait (T20)LOW sample
49 runs off 68 balls in 2 T20 matches — strike rate 72.1 vs 94.9 overall, average 49.0 vs 24.6 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| United Arab Emirates | T20 | 5 | 72 | 131 | 14.4 | 55.0 | 6.1 | 66.4 | MEDIUM |
| Qatar | T20 | 9 | 103 | 105 | 17.2 | 98.1 | 8.6 | 35.2 | LOW |
| Denmark | T20 | 3 | 101 | 79 | 33.7 | 127.8 | 16.5 | 32.9 | LOW |
| Bahrain | T20 | 5 | 86 | 77 | 21.5 | 111.7 | 11.7 | 36.4 | LOW |
| Saudi Arabia | T20 | 2 | 115 | 77 | — | 149.4 | 16.9 | 20.8 | LOW |
| Kuwait | T20 | 2 | 49 | 68 | 49.0 | 72.1 | 2.9 | 45.6 | LOW |
| Philippines | T20 | 1 | 43 | 34 | 43.0 | 126.5 | 11.8 | 32.4 | LOW |
Bowling
| Denmark | T20 | 72 | 56 | 4 | 4.7 | 14.0 | LOW |
| Qatar | T20 | 72 | 73 | 4 | 6.1 | 18.3 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Al Amerat Cricket Ground Oman Cricket (Ministry Turf 2) | T20 | 8 | 226 | 216 | 32.3 | 104.6 | 13.0 | 43.5 | MEDIUM |
| Al Amerat Cricket Ground Oman Cricket (Ministry Turf 1) | T20 | 9 | 146 | 160 | 24.3 | 91.3 | 9.4 | 46.3 | MEDIUM |
| West End Park International Cricket Stadium, Doha | T20 | 4 | 78 | 72 | 39.0 | 108.3 | 8.3 | 29.2 | LOW |
| Selangor Turf Club, Kuala Lumpur | T20 | 3 | 67 | 64 | 33.5 | 104.7 | 6.3 | 28.1 | LOW |
| YSD-UKM Cricket Oval, Bangi | T20 | 3 | 55 | 56 | 18.3 | 98.2 | 8.9 | 44.6 | LOW |
Bowling
| West End Park International Cricket Stadium, Doha | T20 | 72 | 73 | 4 | 6.1 | 18.3 | LOW |
| Al Amerat Cricket Ground Oman Cricket (Ministry Turf 2) | T20 | 66 | 53 | 5 | 4.8 | 10.6 | LOW |
| YSD-UKM Cricket Oval, Bangi | T20 | 44 | 49 | 4 | 6.7 | 12.3 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 31 | 590 | 622 | 24.6 | 94.9 | 9.6 | 44.1 | HIGH |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 228 | 198 | 15 | 5.2 | 13.2 | MEDIUM |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 22 | 327 | 324 | 27.3 | 100.9 | 9.6 | 39.2 | HIGH |
| powerplay | T20 | 24 | 167 | 222 | 20.9 | 75.2 | 8.6 | 55.4 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 7 | 96 | 76 | 24.0 | 126.3 | 13.2 | 31.6 | LOW |
Bowling
| death | T20 | 134 | 143 | 8 | 6.4 | 17.9 | LOW |
| middle | T20 | 94 | 55 | 7 | 3.5 | 7.9 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 23 | 243 | 233 | 27.0 | 104.3 | 12.9 | 42.1 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | T20 | 20 | 160 | 228 | 14.5 | 70.2 | 4.4 | 51.8 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 17 | 187 | 161 | 46.8 | 116.1 | 12.4 | 36.0 | MEDIUM |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.