G Chilia betting stats, splits & projections
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 12 | 86 | 142 | 10.8 | 60.6 | 4.2 | 58.5 | MEDIUM |
| overall | T20 | 25 | 26 | 2 | 6.2 | 13.0 | LOW |
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| United States of America | T20 | 2 | 22 | 30 | 11.0 | 73.3 | 10.0 | 66.7 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Gahanga International Cricket Stadium. Rwanda | T20 | 4 | 26 | 37 | 13.0 | 70.3 | 8.1 | 64.9 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 12 | 86 | 142 | 10.8 | 60.6 | 4.2 | 58.5 | MEDIUM |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 7 | 48 | 81 | 16.0 | 59.3 | 3.7 | 59.3 | LOW |
| death | T20 | 9 | 38 | 61 | 7.6 | 62.3 | 4.9 | 57.4 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| SPIN | T20 | 8 | 59 | 94 | 19.7 | 62.8 | 5.3 | 57.4 | LOW |
| PACE | T20 | 8 | 21 | 33 | 5.3 | 63.6 | 3.0 | 57.6 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.