G Newton betting stats, splits & projections
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 4 | 57 | 49 | 57.0 | 116.3 | 4.1 | 20.4 | LOW |
| overall | T20 | 141 | 124 | 6 | 5.3 | 20.7 | LOW |
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
Bowling
| Guernsey | T20 | 51 | 57 | 1 | 6.7 | 57.0 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
Bowling
| Tikkurila Cricket Ground | T20 | 72 | 45 | 5 | 3.8 | 9.0 | LOW |
| King George V Sports Ground, Castel | T20 | 51 | 57 | 1 | 6.7 | 57.0 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 4 | 57 | 49 | 57.0 | 116.3 | 4.1 | 20.4 | LOW |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 141 | 124 | 6 | 5.3 | 20.7 | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
Bowling
| powerplay | T20 | 93 | 85 | 3 | 5.5 | 28.3 | LOW |
| middle | T20 | 36 | 35 | 0 | 5.8 | — | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.