GC Bhogle betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 24 | 407 | 426 | 29.1 | 95.5 | 10.1 | 46.2 | HIGH |
| overall | ODI | 6 | 82 | 159 | 13.7 | 51.6 | 6.3 | 67.9 | MEDIUM |
Why we like it
Splits where GC Bhogle scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Venue: Gahanga International Cricket Stadium. Rwanda (T20)LOW sample
99 runs off 77 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 128.6 vs 95.5 overall, average 49.5 vs 29.1 overall.
- Phase: death (T20)LOW sample
135 runs off 89 balls in 9 T20 matches — strike rate 151.7 vs 95.5 overall, average 45.0 vs 29.1 overall.
- Phase: middle (ODI)LOW sample
49 runs off 79 balls in 2 ODI matches — strike rate 62.0 vs 51.6 overall, average 24.5 vs 13.7 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Phase: middle (T20)MEDIUM sample
170 runs off 200 balls in 15 T20 matches — strike rate 85.0 vs 95.5 overall, average 21.3 vs 29.1 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)MEDIUM sample
102 runs off 137 balls in 12 T20 matches — strike rate 74.5 vs 95.5 overall, average 34.0 vs 29.1 overall.
- Opposition: Canada (T20)LOW sample
55 runs off 75 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 73.3 vs 95.5 overall, average 27.5 vs 29.1 overall.
- Opposition: Netherlands (T20)LOW sample
57 runs off 67 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 85.1 vs 95.5 overall, average 28.5 vs 29.1 overall.
- Venue: Woodley Cricket Field, Los Angeles (T20)LOW sample
84 runs off 101 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 83.2 vs 95.5 overall, average 28.0 vs 29.1 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (ODI)LOW sample
33 runs off 80 balls in 5 ODI matches — strike rate 41.3 vs 51.6 overall, average 8.3 vs 13.7 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Zimbabwe | ODI | 4 | 40 | 83 | 10.0 | 48.2 | 6.0 | 71.1 | LOW |
| Canada | T20 | 3 | 55 | 75 | 27.5 | 73.3 | 4.0 | 53.3 | LOW |
| Netherlands | T20 | 4 | 57 | 67 | 28.5 | 85.1 | 7.5 | 49.3 | LOW |
| Argentina | T20 | 2 | 38 | 50 | 19.0 | 76.0 | 6.0 | 56.0 | LOW |
| Scotland | ODI | 1 | 35 | 49 | 35.0 | 71.4 | 10.2 | 59.2 | LOW |
| Rwanda | T20 | 2 | 41 | 44 | — | 93.2 | 6.8 | 36.4 | LOW |
| Zimbabwe | T20 | 3 | 49 | 43 | 24.5 | 114.0 | 11.6 | 34.9 | LOW |
| Papua New Guinea | T20 | 1 | 35 | 39 | 35.0 | 89.7 | 10.3 | 51.3 | LOW |
| Nepal | T20 | 2 | 46 | 37 | 46.0 | 124.3 | 21.6 | 45.9 | LOW |
| Brazil | T20 | 2 | 26 | 30 | 26.0 | 86.7 | 13.3 | 56.7 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Woodley Cricket Field, Los Angeles | T20 | 4 | 84 | 101 | 28.0 | 83.2 | 8.9 | 55.4 | LOW |
| Harare Sports Club | ODI | 4 | 40 | 83 | 10.0 | 48.2 | 6.0 | 71.1 | LOW |
| Gahanga International Cricket Stadium. Rwanda | T20 | 4 | 99 | 77 | 49.5 | 128.6 | 16.9 | 32.5 | LOW |
| ICC Academy, Dubai | ODI | 2 | 42 | 76 | 21.0 | 55.3 | 6.6 | 64.5 | LOW |
| St Albans Club, Buenos Aires | T20 | 3 | 35 | 54 | 17.5 | 64.8 | 1.9 | 53.7 | LOW |
| Grand Prairie Stadium, Dallas | T20 | 3 | 49 | 43 | 24.5 | 114.0 | 11.6 | 34.9 | LOW |
| Mulpani Cricket Ground | T20 | 1 | 35 | 39 | 35.0 | 89.7 | 10.3 | 51.3 | LOW |
| Tribhuvan University International Cricket Ground, Kirtipur | T20 | 1 | 36 | 37 | 36.0 | 97.3 | 10.8 | 45.9 | LOW |
| Sportpark Maarschalkerweerd, Utrecht | T20 | 3 | 21 | 30 | 21.0 | 70.0 | 3.3 | 53.3 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 24 | 407 | 426 | 29.1 | 95.5 | 10.1 | 46.2 | HIGH |
| Zimbabwe | ODI | 4 | 40 | 83 | 10.0 | 48.2 | 6.0 | 71.1 | LOW |
| Unknown | ODI | 2 | 42 | 76 | 21.0 | 55.3 | 6.6 | 64.5 | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 15 | 170 | 200 | 21.3 | 85.0 | 7.0 | 47.5 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 12 | 102 | 137 | 34.0 | 74.5 | 8.8 | 59.1 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 9 | 135 | 89 | 45.0 | 151.7 | 19.1 | 23.6 | LOW |
| powerplay | ODI | 5 | 33 | 80 | 8.3 | 41.3 | 5.0 | 72.5 | LOW |
| middle | ODI | 2 | 49 | 79 | 24.5 | 62.0 | 7.6 | 63.3 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| SPIN | T20 | 18 | 236 | 238 | 29.5 | 99.2 | 9.7 | 42.0 | MEDIUM |
| PACE | T20 | 18 | 138 | 150 | 23.0 | 92.0 | 11.3 | 52.0 | MEDIUM |
| PACE | ODI | 6 | 41 | 88 | 8.2 | 46.6 | 5.7 | 71.6 | LOW |
| SPIN | ODI | 3 | 39 | 68 | — | 57.4 | 7.4 | 63.2 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 8 | 33 | 38 | — | 86.8 | 7.9 | 50.0 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.