GT Taylor betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 17 | 185 | 210 | 13.2 | 88.1 | 12.9 | 56.7 | MEDIUM |
| overall | T20 | 143 | 216 | 6 | 9.1 | 36.0 | LOW |
Why we like it
Splits where GT Taylor scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Venue: Maple Leaf North-West Ground, King City (T20)LOW sample
93 runs off 87 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 106.9 vs 88.1 overall, average 18.6 vs 13.2 overall.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)LOW sample
89 runs off 86 balls in 13 T20 matches — strike rate 103.5 vs 88.1 overall, average 11.1 vs 13.2 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
No split is materially below their own format baseline.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Bermuda | T20 | 5 | 63 | 51 | 21.0 | 123.5 | 21.6 | 54.9 | LOW |
| Cayman Islands | T20 | 3 | 37 | 41 | 12.3 | 90.2 | 12.2 | 51.2 | LOW |
| Canada | T20 | 3 | 17 | 32 | 5.7 | 53.1 | 9.4 | 75.0 | LOW |
Bowling
| Cayman Islands | T20 | 36 | 70 | 1 | 11.7 | 70.0 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Maple Leaf North-West Ground, King City | T20 | 6 | 93 | 87 | 18.6 | 106.9 | 17.2 | 54.0 | LOW |
| White Hill Field, Sandys Parish | T20 | 4 | 52 | 58 | 17.3 | 89.7 | 12.1 | 51.7 | LOW |
| St Albans Club, Buenos Aires | T20 | 2 | 21 | 33 | 10.5 | 63.6 | 6.1 | 60.6 | LOW |
Bowling
| White Hill Field, Sandys Parish | T20 | 53 | 70 | 3 | 7.9 | 23.3 | LOW |
| Maple Leaf North-East Ground, King City | T20 | 48 | 61 | 2 | 7.6 | 30.5 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 17 | 185 | 210 | 13.2 | 88.1 | 12.9 | 56.7 | MEDIUM |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 143 | 216 | 6 | 9.1 | 36.0 | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| powerplay | T20 | 15 | 115 | 135 | 14.4 | 85.2 | 14.1 | 61.5 | MEDIUM |
| middle | T20 | 7 | 66 | 69 | 13.2 | 95.7 | 11.6 | 49.3 | LOW |
Bowling
| powerplay | T20 | 66 | 107 | 0 | 9.7 | — | LOW |
| middle | T20 | 42 | 55 | 1 | 7.9 | 55.0 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 12 | 83 | 101 | 20.8 | 82.2 | 13.9 | 64.4 | LOW |
| SPIN | T20 | 13 | 89 | 86 | 11.1 | 103.5 | 15.1 | 50.0 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.