Gull Feroza betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 35 | 501 | 471 | 16.7 | 106.4 | 16.1 | 47.6 | HIGH |
| overall | ODI | 4 | 21 | 35 | 5.3 | 60.0 | 5.7 | 68.6 | LOW |
Why we like it
Splits where Gull Feroza scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)MEDIUM sample
251 runs off 190 balls in 29 T20 matches — strike rate 132.1 vs 106.4 overall, average 19.3 vs 16.7 overall.
- Venue: Rangiri Dambulla International Stadium (T20)LOW sample
149 runs off 119 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 125.2 vs 106.4 overall, average 49.7 vs 16.7 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)MEDIUM sample
229 runs off 258 balls in 23 T20 matches — strike rate 88.8 vs 106.4 overall, average 16.4 vs 16.7 overall.
- Opposition: West Indies (T20)LOW sample
66 runs off 87 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 75.9 vs 106.4 overall, average 16.5 vs 16.7 overall.
- Venue: National Stadium, Karachi (T20)LOW sample
98 runs off 108 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 90.7 vs 106.4 overall, average 24.5 vs 16.7 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| West Indies | T20 | 6 | 66 | 87 | 16.5 | 75.9 | 9.2 | 57.5 | LOW |
| United Arab Emirates | T20 | 1 | 62 | 55 | — | 112.7 | 14.5 | 41.8 | LOW |
| Netherlands | T20 | 1 | 63 | 52 | — | 121.2 | 17.3 | 32.7 | LOW |
| South Africa | T20 | 7 | 46 | 51 | 6.6 | 90.2 | 13.7 | 54.9 | LOW |
| England | T20 | 3 | 50 | 50 | 16.7 | 100.0 | 16.0 | 54.0 | LOW |
| Nepal | T20 | 1 | 57 | 35 | 57.0 | 162.9 | 28.6 | 34.3 | LOW |
| Sri Lanka | T20 | 4 | 30 | 34 | 7.5 | 88.2 | 8.8 | 47.1 | LOW |
| Zimbabwe | T20 | 2 | 46 | 32 | 23.0 | 143.8 | 28.1 | 40.6 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Rangiri Dambulla International Stadium | T20 | 4 | 149 | 119 | 49.7 | 125.2 | 18.5 | 39.5 | LOW |
| National Stadium, Karachi | T20 | 6 | 98 | 108 | 24.5 | 90.7 | 13.0 | 51.9 | LOW |
| County Ground, Bristol | T20 | 1 | 63 | 52 | — | 121.2 | 17.3 | 32.7 | LOW |
| Headingley, Leeds | T20 | 2 | 31 | 31 | 31.0 | 100.0 | 16.1 | 54.8 | LOW |
| Multan Cricket Stadium | T20 | 3 | 28 | 31 | 9.3 | 90.3 | 16.1 | 58.1 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 34 | 499 | 467 | 17.2 | 106.9 | 16.3 | 47.5 | HIGH |
| Unknown | ODI | 4 | 21 | 35 | 5.3 | 60.0 | 5.7 | 68.6 | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| powerplay | T20 | 33 | 338 | 318 | 14.7 | 106.3 | 17.9 | 51.3 | HIGH |
| middle | T20 | 11 | 146 | 140 | 20.9 | 104.3 | 12.1 | 41.4 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | ODI | 4 | 21 | 35 | 5.3 | 60.0 | 5.7 | 68.6 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| SPIN | T20 | 23 | 229 | 258 | 16.4 | 88.8 | 10.5 | 49.2 | MEDIUM |
| PACE | T20 | 29 | 251 | 190 | 19.3 | 132.1 | 24.2 | 44.7 | MEDIUM |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.