H Doriga betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 24 | 339 | 325 | 16.9 | 104.3 | 16.6 | 57.2 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 60 | 90 | 0 | 9.0 | — | LOW |
Why we like it
Splits where H Doriga scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)MEDIUM sample
166 runs off 134 balls in 19 T20 matches — strike rate 123.9 vs 104.3 overall, average 16.6 vs 16.9 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)MEDIUM sample
169 runs off 165 balls in 12 T20 matches — strike rate 102.4 vs 104.3 overall, average 42.3 vs 16.9 overall.
- Venue: Asian Institute of Technology Ground, Bangkok (T20)LOW sample
71 runs off 63 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 112.7 vs 104.3 overall, average 35.5 vs 16.9 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)MEDIUM sample
149 runs off 164 balls in 18 T20 matches — strike rate 90.9 vs 104.3 overall, average 16.6 vs 16.9 overall.
- Phase: middle (T20)MEDIUM sample
117 runs off 131 balls in 15 T20 matches — strike rate 89.3 vs 104.3 overall, average 9.0 vs 16.9 overall.
- Venue: Mulpani Cricket Ground (T20)LOW sample
75 runs off 89 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 84.3 vs 104.3 overall, average 25.0 vs 16.9 overall.
- Venue: Amini Park, Port Moresby (T20)LOW sample
60 runs off 68 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 88.2 vs 104.3 overall, average 12.0 vs 16.9 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Scotland | T20 | 2 | 63 | 54 | 31.5 | 116.7 | 16.7 | 40.7 | LOW |
| Namibia | T20 | 3 | 48 | 47 | 16.0 | 102.1 | 14.9 | 59.6 | LOW |
| United States of America | T20 | 1 | 17 | 36 | 17.0 | 47.2 | 8.3 | 83.3 | LOW |
| Vanuatu | T20 | 2 | 24 | 34 | 12.0 | 70.6 | 8.8 | 64.7 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Mulpani Cricket Ground | T20 | 3 | 75 | 89 | 25.0 | 84.3 | 13.5 | 70.8 | LOW |
| Amini Park, Port Moresby | T20 | 6 | 60 | 68 | 12.0 | 88.2 | 13.2 | 58.8 | LOW |
| Asian Institute of Technology Ground, Bangkok | T20 | 3 | 71 | 63 | 35.5 | 112.7 | 14.3 | 38.1 | LOW |
| Terdthai Cricket Ground, Bangkok | T20 | 6 | 60 | 57 | 10.0 | 105.3 | 21.1 | 61.4 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 24 | 339 | 325 | 16.9 | 104.3 | 16.6 | 57.2 | HIGH |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 60 | 90 | 0 | 9.0 | — | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| powerplay | T20 | 12 | 169 | 165 | 42.3 | 102.4 | 17.6 | 61.2 | MEDIUM |
| middle | T20 | 15 | 117 | 131 | 9.0 | 89.3 | 13.0 | 58.8 | MEDIUM |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| SPIN | T20 | 18 | 149 | 164 | 16.6 | 90.9 | 14.0 | 61.6 | MEDIUM |
| PACE | T20 | 19 | 166 | 134 | 16.6 | 123.9 | 20.1 | 51.5 | MEDIUM |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.