H Leko betting stats, splits & projections
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 9 | 129 | 182 | 18.4 | 70.9 | 4.4 | 44.0 | MEDIUM |
| overall | T20 | 209 | 148 | 8 | 4.2 | 18.5 | MEDIUM |
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Malta | T20 | 2 | 40 | 53 | 20.0 | 75.5 | 0.0 | 30.2 | LOW |
| Serbia | T20 | 2 | 30 | 49 | 30.0 | 61.2 | 2.0 | 44.9 | LOW |
| Czech Republic | T20 | 2 | 27 | 41 | 13.5 | 65.9 | 7.3 | 56.1 | LOW |
| Bulgaria | T20 | 1 | 28 | 30 | 28.0 | 93.3 | 13.3 | 46.7 | LOW |
Bowling
| Czech Republic | T20 | 48 | 32 | 2 | 4.0 | 16.0 | LOW |
| Serbia | T20 | 48 | 30 | 4 | 3.8 | 7.5 | LOW |
| Malta | T20 | 47 | 41 | 1 | 5.2 | 41.0 | LOW |
| Gibraltar | T20 | 42 | 38 | 1 | 5.4 | 38.0 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Lisicji Jarak Cricket Ground | T20 | 3 | 58 | 79 | 29.0 | 73.4 | 6.3 | 45.6 | LOW |
| Marsa Sports Club | T20 | 2 | 40 | 53 | 20.0 | 75.5 | 0.0 | 30.2 | LOW |
| Scott Page Field, Vinor | T20 | 4 | 31 | 50 | 10.3 | 62.0 | 6.0 | 56.0 | LOW |
Bowling
| Scott Page Field, Vinor | T20 | 90 | 70 | 3 | 4.7 | 23.3 | LOW |
| Lisicji Jarak Cricket Ground | T20 | 72 | 37 | 4 | 3.1 | 9.3 | LOW |
| Marsa Sports Club | T20 | 47 | 41 | 1 | 5.2 | 41.0 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 9 | 129 | 182 | 18.4 | 70.9 | 4.4 | 44.0 | MEDIUM |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 209 | 148 | 8 | 4.2 | 18.5 | MEDIUM |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| powerplay | T20 | 9 | 84 | 120 | 28.0 | 70.0 | 5.8 | 49.2 | MEDIUM |
| middle | T20 | 5 | 39 | 53 | 9.8 | 73.6 | 1.9 | 32.1 | LOW |
Bowling
| powerplay | T20 | 126 | 106 | 7 | 5.0 | 15.1 | LOW |
| death | T20 | 47 | 25 | 0 | 3.2 | — | LOW |
| middle | T20 | 36 | 17 | 1 | 2.8 | 17.0 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 9 | 78 | 119 | 13.0 | 65.5 | 4.2 | 48.7 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 6 | 46 | 57 | 46.0 | 80.7 | 5.3 | 36.8 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.