Habib Khan betting stats, splits & projections
Bowler
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 19 | 461 | 345 | 24.3 | 133.6 | 18.3 | 43.2 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 445 | 541 | 33 | 7.3 | 16.4 | HIGH |
Why we like it
Splits where Habib Khan scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Opposition: Switzerland (T20)LOW sample
141 runs off 75 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 188.0 vs 133.6 overall, average 35.3 vs 24.3 overall.
- Venue: Estonian National Cricket and Rugby Field (T20)LOW sample
172 runs off 103 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 167.0 vs 133.6 overall, average 34.4 vs 24.3 overall.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)LOW sample
190 runs off 112 balls in 8 T20 matches — strike rate 169.6 vs 133.6 overall, average 38.0 vs 24.3 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)MEDIUM sample
232 runs off 209 balls in 19 T20 matches — strike rate 111.0 vs 133.6 overall, average 17.8 vs 24.3 overall.
- Phase: middle (T20)MEDIUM sample
154 runs off 133 balls in 10 T20 matches — strike rate 115.8 vs 133.6 overall, average 19.3 vs 24.3 overall.
- Opposition: Malta (T20)LOW sample
86 runs off 71 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 121.1 vs 133.6 overall, average 21.5 vs 24.3 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Switzerland | T20 | 4 | 141 | 75 | 35.3 | 188.0 | 29.3 | 34.7 | LOW |
| Malta | T20 | 4 | 86 | 71 | 21.5 | 121.1 | 16.9 | 42.3 | LOW |
| Serbia | T20 | 1 | 43 | 40 | 43.0 | 107.5 | 10.0 | 52.5 | LOW |
| Turkey | T20 | 1 | 64 | 38 | 64.0 | 168.4 | 21.1 | 26.3 | LOW |
| Guernsey | T20 | 1 | 39 | 37 | 39.0 | 105.4 | 10.8 | 40.5 | LOW |
| Finland | T20 | 2 | 31 | 31 | 15.5 | 100.0 | 12.9 | 58.1 | LOW |
| Czech Republic | T20 | 2 | 35 | 30 | 17.5 | 116.7 | 20.0 | 50.0 | LOW |
Bowling
| Malta | T20 | 96 | 144 | 5 | 9.0 | 28.8 | LOW |
| Switzerland | T20 | 96 | 121 | 7 | 7.6 | 17.3 | LOW |
| Finland | T20 | 60 | 69 | 6 | 6.9 | 11.5 | LOW |
| Czech Republic | T20 | 48 | 29 | 5 | 3.6 | 5.8 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Estonian National Cricket and Rugby Field | T20 | 5 | 172 | 103 | 34.4 | 167.0 | 25.2 | 39.8 | LOW |
| Guernsey Rovers Athletic Club Ground, Port Soif | T20 | 2 | 71 | 52 | 35.5 | 136.5 | 21.2 | 36.5 | LOW |
| Koge Cricket Club | T20 | 3 | 52 | 50 | 17.3 | 104.0 | 12.0 | 56.0 | LOW |
| Svanholm Park, Brondby | T20 | 2 | 65 | 41 | 32.5 | 158.5 | 19.5 | 29.3 | LOW |
| King George V Sports Ground, Castel | T20 | 1 | 39 | 37 | 39.0 | 105.4 | 10.8 | 40.5 | LOW |
| Marsa Sports Club | T20 | 3 | 41 | 37 | 13.7 | 110.8 | 16.2 | 54.1 | LOW |
Bowling
| Estonian National Cricket and Rugby Field | T20 | 108 | 144 | 9 | 8.0 | 16.0 | LOW |
| Guernsey Rovers Athletic Club Ground, Port Soif | T20 | 72 | 66 | 2 | 5.5 | 33.0 | LOW |
| Marsa Sports Club | T20 | 72 | 115 | 4 | 9.6 | 28.8 | LOW |
| Koge Cricket Club | T20 | 48 | 62 | 3 | 7.8 | 20.7 | LOW |
| Svanholm Park, Brondby | T20 | 48 | 57 | 5 | 7.1 | 11.4 | LOW |
| King George V Sports Ground, Castel | T20 | 43 | 49 | 4 | 6.8 | 12.3 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 19 | 461 | 345 | 24.3 | 133.6 | 18.3 | 43.2 | HIGH |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 445 | 541 | 33 | 7.3 | 16.4 | HIGH |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| powerplay | T20 | 17 | 266 | 193 | 29.6 | 137.8 | 21.2 | 46.1 | MEDIUM |
| middle | T20 | 10 | 154 | 133 | 19.3 | 115.8 | 12.0 | 42.1 | MEDIUM |
Bowling
| middle | T20 | 217 | 246 | 12 | 6.8 | 20.5 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 138 | 151 | 15 | 6.6 | 10.1 | LOW |
| powerplay | T20 | 90 | 144 | 6 | 9.6 | 24.0 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 19 | 232 | 209 | 17.8 | 111.0 | 15.8 | 48.8 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | T20 | 8 | 190 | 112 | 38.0 | 169.6 | 23.2 | 34.8 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.