HAM Shah betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 31 | 1308 | 921 | 45.1 | 142.0 | 18.5 | 34.1 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 243 | 264 | 22 | 6.5 | 12.0 | MEDIUM |
Why we like it
Splits where HAM Shah scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)HIGH sample
632 runs off 419 balls in 30 T20 matches — strike rate 150.8 vs 142.0 overall, average 45.1 vs 45.1 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)HIGH sample
536 runs off 417 balls in 31 T20 matches — strike rate 128.5 vs 142.0 overall, average 53.6 vs 45.1 overall.
- Opposition: Germany (T20)MEDIUM sample
205 runs off 121 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 169.4 vs 142.0 overall, average 68.3 vs 45.1 overall.
- Venue: King George V Sports Ground, Castel (T20)MEDIUM sample
213 runs off 131 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 162.6 vs 142.0 overall, average 71.0 vs 45.1 overall.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)MEDIUM sample
293 runs off 237 balls in 21 T20 matches — strike rate 123.6 vs 142.0 overall, average 58.6 vs 45.1 overall.
- Venue: Koge Cricket Club (T20)LOW sample
126 runs off 80 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 157.5 vs 142.0 overall, average 42.0 vs 45.1 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Opposition: Finland (T20)MEDIUM sample
229 runs off 175 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 130.9 vs 142.0 overall, average 38.2 vs 45.1 overall.
- Venue: Royal Brussels Cricket Club Ground, Waterloo (T20)LOW sample
126 runs off 109 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 115.6 vs 142.0 overall, average 42.0 vs 45.1 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Finland | T20 | 6 | 229 | 175 | 38.2 | 130.9 | 15.4 | 41.1 | MEDIUM |
| Germany | T20 | 4 | 205 | 121 | 68.3 | 169.4 | 23.1 | 27.3 | MEDIUM |
| Norway | T20 | 3 | 81 | 59 | 27.0 | 137.3 | 18.6 | 40.7 | LOW |
| Czech Republic | T20 | 1 | 100 | 58 | 100.0 | 172.4 | 24.1 | 20.7 | LOW |
| Cyprus | T20 | 1 | 91 | 55 | 91.0 | 165.5 | 21.8 | 18.2 | LOW |
| Hungary | T20 | 1 | 95 | 51 | 95.0 | 186.3 | 25.5 | 23.5 | LOW |
| Belgium | T20 | 1 | 58 | 48 | 58.0 | 120.8 | 16.7 | 35.4 | LOW |
| Estonia | T20 | 1 | 77 | 48 | 77.0 | 160.4 | 25.0 | 33.3 | LOW |
| Greece | T20 | 1 | 59 | 45 | 59.0 | 131.1 | 17.8 | 33.3 | LOW |
| Turkey | T20 | 1 | 79 | 45 | 79.0 | 175.6 | 20.0 | 28.9 | LOW |
| Romania | T20 | 1 | 48 | 42 | 48.0 | 114.3 | 14.3 | 35.7 | LOW |
| Scotland | T20 | 1 | 56 | 42 | 56.0 | 133.3 | 16.7 | 35.7 | LOW |
| Portugal | T20 | 1 | 44 | 37 | — | 118.9 | 10.8 | 29.7 | LOW |
| Sweden | T20 | 2 | 31 | 34 | 15.5 | 91.2 | 8.8 | 47.1 | LOW |
Bowling
| Germany | T20 | 64 | 68 | 8 | 6.4 | 8.5 | LOW |
| Jersey | T20 | 42 | 49 | 3 | 7.0 | 16.3 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Svanholm Park, Brondby | T20 | 17 | 684 | 481 | 42.8 | 142.2 | 18.3 | 36.0 | HIGH |
| King George V Sports Ground, Castel | T20 | 3 | 213 | 131 | 71.0 | 162.6 | 22.9 | 24.4 | MEDIUM |
| Royal Brussels Cricket Club Ground, Waterloo | T20 | 4 | 126 | 109 | 42.0 | 115.6 | 14.7 | 35.8 | LOW |
| Koge Cricket Club | T20 | 3 | 126 | 80 | 42.0 | 157.5 | 17.5 | 31.3 | LOW |
| Guernsey Rovers Athletic Club Ground, Port Soif | T20 | 1 | 59 | 45 | 59.0 | 131.1 | 17.8 | 33.3 | LOW |
| Grange Cricket Club Ground, Raeburn Place, Edinburgh | T20 | 1 | 56 | 42 | 56.0 | 133.3 | 16.7 | 35.7 | LOW |
| Ishoj Cricket Club, Vejledalen | T20 | 1 | 44 | 30 | 44.0 | 146.7 | 23.3 | 40.0 | LOW |
Bowling
| Svanholm Park, Brondby | T20 | 177 | 207 | 15 | 7.0 | 13.8 | MEDIUM |
| Royal Brussels Cricket Club Ground, Waterloo | T20 | 48 | 35 | 5 | 4.4 | 7.0 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 31 | 1308 | 921 | 45.1 | 142.0 | 18.5 | 34.1 | HIGH |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 243 | 264 | 22 | 6.5 | 12.0 | MEDIUM |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 21 | 568 | 421 | 47.3 | 134.9 | 14.5 | 27.8 | HIGH |
| powerplay | T20 | 31 | 536 | 417 | 53.6 | 128.5 | 18.2 | 43.4 | HIGH |
| death | T20 | 8 | 204 | 83 | 29.1 | 245.8 | 39.8 | 19.3 | LOW |
Bowling
| middle | T20 | 144 | 164 | 6 | 6.8 | 27.3 | LOW |
| death | T20 | 95 | 93 | 16 | 5.9 | 5.8 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 30 | 632 | 419 | 45.1 | 150.8 | 20.5 | 33.7 | HIGH |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 24 | 383 | 265 | 38.3 | 144.5 | 19.6 | 35.8 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | T20 | 21 | 293 | 237 | 58.6 | 123.6 | 13.5 | 32.9 | MEDIUM |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.