Hamza Dar betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 26 | 546 | 338 | 32.1 | 161.5 | 20.1 | 30.2 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 84 | 107 | 4 | 7.6 | 26.8 | LOW |
Why we like it
Splits where Hamza Dar scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Bowling type: UNKNOWN (T20)MEDIUM sample
218 runs off 134 balls in 17 T20 matches — strike rate 162.7 vs 161.5 overall, average 54.5 vs 32.1 overall.
- Opposition: Croatia (T20)LOW sample
277 runs off 117 balls in 7 T20 matches — strike rate 236.8 vs 161.5 overall, average 277.0 vs 32.1 overall.
- Venue: Mladost Cricket Ground, Zagreb (T20)LOW sample
171 runs off 82 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 208.5 vs 161.5 overall, average 171.0 vs 32.1 overall.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)LOW sample
197 runs off 97 balls in 17 T20 matches — strike rate 203.1 vs 161.5 overall, average 32.8 vs 32.1 overall.
- Phase: death (T20)LOW sample
241 runs off 92 balls in 10 T20 matches — strike rate 262.0 vs 161.5 overall, average 48.2 vs 32.1 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Phase: middle (T20)MEDIUM sample
277 runs off 219 balls in 21 T20 matches — strike rate 126.5 vs 161.5 overall, average 25.2 vs 32.1 overall.
- Venue: Desert Springs Cricket Ground, Almeria (T20)LOW sample
108 runs off 96 balls in 7 T20 matches — strike rate 112.5 vs 161.5 overall, average 18.0 vs 32.1 overall.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)LOW sample
131 runs off 107 balls in 13 T20 matches — strike rate 122.4 vs 161.5 overall, average 18.7 vs 32.1 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Croatia | T20 | 7 | 277 | 117 | 277.0 | 236.8 | 35.9 | 22.2 | LOW |
| Germany | T20 | 2 | 38 | 36 | 19.0 | 105.6 | 8.3 | 41.7 | LOW |
| Italy | T20 | 2 | 33 | 31 | 16.5 | 106.5 | 6.5 | 32.3 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Desert Springs Cricket Ground, Almeria | T20 | 7 | 108 | 96 | 18.0 | 112.5 | 9.4 | 36.5 | LOW |
| Mladost Cricket Ground, Zagreb | T20 | 5 | 171 | 82 | 171.0 | 208.5 | 32.9 | 26.8 | LOW |
| La Manga Club Top Ground | T20 | 4 | 111 | 41 | 55.5 | 270.7 | 39.0 | 19.5 | LOW |
| Guernsey Rovers Athletic Club Ground, Port Soif | T20 | 2 | 44 | 39 | 22.0 | 112.8 | 10.3 | 38.5 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 26 | 546 | 338 | 32.1 | 161.5 | 20.1 | 30.2 | HIGH |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 84 | 107 | 4 | 7.6 | 26.8 | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 21 | 277 | 219 | 25.2 | 126.5 | 12.3 | 32.0 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 10 | 241 | 92 | 48.2 | 262.0 | 40.2 | 20.7 | LOW |
Bowling
| powerplay | T20 | 42 | 49 | 3 | 7.0 | 16.3 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 17 | 218 | 134 | 54.5 | 162.7 | 20.1 | 32.1 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | T20 | 13 | 131 | 107 | 18.7 | 122.4 | 13.1 | 32.7 | LOW |
| PACE | T20 | 17 | 197 | 97 | 32.8 | 203.1 | 27.8 | 24.7 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.