HDJ Siegers betting stats, splits & projections
All-rounder
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 49 | 1050 | 828 | 23.3 | 126.8 | 17.8 | 40.3 | HIGH |
| overall | ODI | 5 | 105 | 122 | 21.0 | 86.1 | 8.2 | 48.4 | MEDIUM |
| overall | T20 | 466 | 468 | 23 | 6.0 | 20.3 | HIGH |
Why we like it
Splits where HDJ Siegers scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Venue: Sportpark Maarschalkerweerd, Utrecht (T20)MEDIUM sample
300 runs off 256 balls in 11 T20 matches — strike rate 117.2 vs 126.8 overall, average 33.3 vs 23.3 overall.
- Phase: middle (T20)MEDIUM sample
318 runs off 288 balls in 17 T20 matches — strike rate 110.4 vs 126.8 overall, average 45.4 vs 23.3 overall.
- Opposition: United States of America (T20)LOW sample
118 runs off 75 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 157.3 vs 126.8 overall, average 23.6 vs 23.3 overall.
- Opposition: Jersey (T20)LOW sample
109 runs off 73 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 149.3 vs 126.8 overall, average 36.3 vs 23.3 overall.
- Venue: Hazelaarweg, Rotterdam (T20)LOW sample
143 runs off 88 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 162.5 vs 126.8 overall, average 71.5 vs 23.3 overall.
- Venue: Grange Cricket Club Ground, Raeburn Place, Edinburgh (T20)LOW sample
120 runs off 81 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 148.1 vs 126.8 overall, average 30.0 vs 23.3 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)HIGH sample
425 runs off 370 balls in 44 T20 matches — strike rate 114.9 vs 126.8 overall, average 21.3 vs 23.3 overall.
- Opposition: Thailand (T20)MEDIUM sample
119 runs off 131 balls in 8 T20 matches — strike rate 90.8 vs 126.8 overall, average 17.0 vs 23.3 overall.
- Opposition: Namibia (T20)LOW sample
80 runs off 82 balls in 2 T20 matches — strike rate 97.6 vs 126.8 overall, average 40.0 vs 23.3 overall.
- Opposition: Ireland (T20)LOW sample
73 runs off 71 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 102.8 vs 126.8 overall, average 18.3 vs 23.3 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Thailand | T20 | 8 | 119 | 131 | 17.0 | 90.8 | 9.9 | 47.3 | MEDIUM |
| Thailand | ODI | 5 | 105 | 122 | 21.0 | 86.1 | 8.2 | 48.4 | MEDIUM |
| Scotland | T20 | 7 | 144 | 114 | 24.0 | 126.3 | 19.3 | 41.2 | LOW |
| Namibia | T20 | 2 | 80 | 82 | 40.0 | 97.6 | 11.0 | 46.3 | LOW |
| Bangladesh | T20 | 4 | 90 | 75 | 22.5 | 120.0 | 16.0 | 37.3 | LOW |
| United States of America | T20 | 5 | 118 | 75 | 23.6 | 157.3 | 22.7 | 30.7 | LOW |
| Jersey | T20 | 3 | 109 | 73 | 36.3 | 149.3 | 19.2 | 31.5 | LOW |
| Ireland | T20 | 5 | 73 | 71 | 18.3 | 102.8 | 12.7 | 47.9 | LOW |
| Germany | T20 | 1 | 106 | 54 | — | 196.3 | 33.3 | 27.8 | LOW |
| Nepal | T20 | 3 | 62 | 45 | 20.7 | 137.8 | 20.0 | 33.3 | LOW |
Bowling
| Bangladesh | T20 | 78 | 90 | 5 | 6.9 | 18.0 | LOW |
| United States of America | T20 | 75 | 52 | 4 | 4.2 | 13.0 | LOW |
| Scotland | T20 | 59 | 73 | 2 | 7.4 | 36.5 | LOW |
| Nepal | T20 | 54 | 45 | 3 | 5.0 | 15.0 | LOW |
| Thailand | T20 | 54 | 39 | 4 | 4.3 | 9.8 | LOW |
| Italy | T20 | 48 | 34 | 2 | 4.3 | 17.0 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Sportpark Maarschalkerweerd, Utrecht | T20 | 11 | 300 | 256 | 33.3 | 117.2 | 13.3 | 36.7 | MEDIUM |
| Hazelaarweg, Rotterdam | T20 | 4 | 143 | 88 | 71.5 | 162.5 | 25.0 | 31.8 | LOW |
| Royal Chiangmai Golf Club | ODI | 3 | 65 | 81 | 21.7 | 80.2 | 6.2 | 46.9 | LOW |
| Grange Cricket Club Ground, Raeburn Place, Edinburgh | T20 | 4 | 120 | 81 | 30.0 | 148.1 | 24.7 | 32.1 | LOW |
| Tribhuvan University International Cricket Ground, Kirtipur | T20 | 8 | 119 | 81 | 14.9 | 146.9 | 22.2 | 37.0 | LOW |
| Royal Chiangmai Golf Club | T20 | 3 | 57 | 58 | 19.0 | 98.3 | 13.8 | 51.7 | LOW |
| Sportpark Westvliet, Voorburg | T20 | 1 | 39 | 42 | 39.0 | 92.9 | 9.5 | 45.2 | LOW |
| VRA Ground, Amstelveen | ODI | 2 | 40 | 41 | 20.0 | 97.6 | 12.2 | 51.2 | LOW |
| Desert Springs Cricket Ground, Almeria | T20 | 4 | 83 | 40 | 20.8 | 207.5 | 35.0 | 37.5 | LOW |
| Sportpark Harga, Schiedam | T20 | 1 | 41 | 40 | 41.0 | 102.5 | 12.5 | 47.5 | LOW |
Bowling
| Tribhuvan University International Cricket Ground, Kirtipur | T20 | 144 | 121 | 7 | 5.0 | 17.3 | LOW |
| Hazelaarweg, Rotterdam | T20 | 74 | 66 | 2 | 5.4 | 33.0 | LOW |
| Grange Cricket Club Ground, Raeburn Place, Edinburgh | T20 | 71 | 107 | 5 | 9.0 | 21.4 | LOW |
| Sportpark Maarschalkerweerd, Utrecht | T20 | 51 | 33 | 3 | 3.9 | 11.0 | LOW |
| Mulpani Cricket Ground | T20 | 42 | 23 | 3 | 3.3 | 7.7 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 49 | 1050 | 828 | 23.3 | 126.8 | 17.8 | 40.3 | HIGH |
| Unknown | ODI | 5 | 105 | 122 | 21.0 | 86.1 | 8.2 | 48.4 | MEDIUM |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 466 | 468 | 23 | 6.0 | 20.3 | HIGH |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| powerplay | T20 | 44 | 618 | 467 | 19.3 | 132.3 | 20.6 | 43.3 | HIGH |
| middle | T20 | 17 | 318 | 288 | 45.4 | 110.4 | 12.2 | 37.8 | MEDIUM |
| middle | ODI | 4 | 79 | 94 | 19.8 | 84.0 | 7.4 | 47.9 | LOW |
| death | T20 | 9 | 114 | 73 | 19.0 | 156.2 | 21.9 | 31.5 | LOW |
Bowling
| powerplay | T20 | 216 | 197 | 8 | 5.5 | 24.6 | MEDIUM |
| middle | T20 | 149 | 161 | 4 | 6.5 | 40.3 | LOW |
| death | T20 | 101 | 110 | 11 | 6.5 | 10.0 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| SPIN | T20 | 37 | 549 | 414 | 23.9 | 132.6 | 16.7 | 33.6 | HIGH |
| PACE | T20 | 44 | 425 | 370 | 21.3 | 114.9 | 18.1 | 49.2 | HIGH |
| SPIN | ODI | 5 | 80 | 100 | 20.0 | 80.0 | 7.0 | 50.0 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 9 | 76 | 44 | 38.0 | 172.7 | 25.0 | 29.5 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.