HJ Manenti betting stats, splits & projections
All-rounder
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 29 | 470 | 424 | 18.1 | 110.8 | 12.3 | 39.9 | HIGH |
| overall | LIST_A | 3 | 78 | 116 | 26.0 | 67.2 | 6.0 | 56.9 | LOW |
| overall | T20 | 405 | 456 | 34 | 6.8 | 13.4 | HIGH |
| overall | LIST_A | 138 | 120 | 4 | 5.2 | 30.0 | LOW |
Why we like it
Splits where HJ Manenti scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Opposition: Scotland (T20)LOW sample
79 runs off 65 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 121.5 vs 110.8 overall, average 26.3 vs 18.1 overall.
- Venue: Simar Cricket Ground, Rome (T20)LOW sample
80 runs off 62 balls in 2 T20 matches — strike rate 129.0 vs 110.8 overall, average 40.0 vs 18.1 overall.
- Phase: death (T20)LOW sample
74 runs off 60 balls in 11 T20 matches — strike rate 123.3 vs 110.8 overall, average 8.2 vs 18.1 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Venue: Sportpark Westvliet, Voorburg (T20)LOW sample
83 runs off 83 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 100.0 vs 110.8 overall, average 27.7 vs 18.1 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Scotland | T20 | 3 | 79 | 65 | 26.3 | 121.5 | 10.8 | 32.3 | LOW |
| Ireland | T20 | 4 | 52 | 53 | 17.3 | 98.1 | 9.4 | 41.5 | LOW |
| France | T20 | 1 | 65 | 51 | 65.0 | 127.5 | 23.5 | 47.1 | LOW |
| Western Australia | LIST_A | 1 | 39 | 49 | 39.0 | 79.6 | 8.2 | 49.0 | LOW |
| Victoria | LIST_A | 1 | 34 | 46 | 34.0 | 73.9 | 6.5 | 56.5 | LOW |
| Denmark | T20 | 1 | 51 | 35 | 51.0 | 145.7 | 17.1 | 20.0 | LOW |
| Isle of Man | T20 | 1 | 31 | 30 | 31.0 | 103.3 | 6.7 | 36.7 | LOW |
Bowling
| Ireland | T20 | 66 | 95 | 3 | 8.6 | 31.7 | LOW |
| Victoria | LIST_A | 60 | 32 | 3 | 3.2 | 10.7 | LOW |
| Scotland | T20 | 54 | 83 | 6 | 9.2 | 13.8 | LOW |
| Western Australia | LIST_A | 42 | 51 | 1 | 7.3 | 51.0 | LOW |
| New South Wales | LIST_A | 36 | 37 | 0 | 6.2 | — | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Sportpark Westvliet, Voorburg | T20 | 3 | 83 | 83 | 27.7 | 100.0 | 7.2 | 32.5 | LOW |
| Simar Cricket Ground, Rome | T20 | 2 | 80 | 62 | 40.0 | 129.0 | 22.6 | 43.5 | LOW |
| Roma Cricket Ground | T20 | 2 | 61 | 56 | 61.0 | 108.9 | 10.7 | 42.9 | LOW |
| Karen Rolton Oval, Adelaide | LIST_A | 1 | 39 | 49 | 39.0 | 79.6 | 8.2 | 49.0 | LOW |
| Adelaide Oval | LIST_A | 1 | 34 | 46 | 34.0 | 73.9 | 6.5 | 56.5 | LOW |
| Eden Gardens, Kolkata | T20 | 3 | 57 | 46 | 19.0 | 123.9 | 15.2 | 45.7 | LOW |
| Grange Cricket Club Ground, Raeburn Place, Edinburgh | T20 | 3 | 61 | 46 | 20.3 | 132.6 | 15.2 | 23.9 | LOW |
| 7he Sevens Stadium, Dubai | T20 | 3 | 35 | 37 | 17.5 | 94.6 | 8.1 | 40.5 | LOW |
Bowling
| Grange Cricket Club Ground, Raeburn Place, Edinburgh | T20 | 69 | 95 | 5 | 8.3 | 19.0 | LOW |
| Kerava National Cricket Ground | T20 | 66 | 52 | 5 | 4.7 | 10.4 | LOW |
| Adelaide Oval | LIST_A | 60 | 32 | 3 | 3.2 | 10.7 | LOW |
| Simar Cricket Ground, Rome | T20 | 60 | 52 | 5 | 5.2 | 10.4 | LOW |
| Sportpark Westvliet, Voorburg | T20 | 60 | 77 | 8 | 7.7 | 9.6 | LOW |
| Goldenacre, Edinburgh | T20 | 48 | 62 | 5 | 7.8 | 12.4 | LOW |
| Karen Rolton Oval, Adelaide | LIST_A | 42 | 51 | 1 | 7.3 | 51.0 | LOW |
| 7he Sevens Stadium, Dubai | T20 | 42 | 56 | 0 | 8.0 | — | LOW |
| Cricket Central, Sydney | LIST_A | 36 | 37 | 0 | 6.2 | — | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 29 | 470 | 424 | 18.1 | 110.8 | 12.3 | 39.9 | HIGH |
| Unknown | LIST_A | 3 | 78 | 116 | 26.0 | 67.2 | 6.0 | 56.9 | LOW |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 405 | 456 | 34 | 6.8 | 13.4 | HIGH |
| Unknown | LIST_A | 138 | 120 | 4 | 5.2 | 30.0 | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 20 | 318 | 291 | 22.7 | 109.3 | 11.0 | 36.8 | MEDIUM |
| middle | LIST_A | 3 | 78 | 116 | 26.0 | 67.2 | 6.0 | 56.9 | LOW |
| powerplay | T20 | 11 | 78 | 73 | 26.0 | 106.8 | 17.8 | 53.4 | LOW |
| death | T20 | 11 | 74 | 60 | 8.2 | 123.3 | 11.7 | 38.3 | LOW |
Bowling
| powerplay | T20 | 168 | 171 | 18 | 6.1 | 9.5 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 147 | 174 | 15 | 7.1 | 11.6 | LOW |
| middle | LIST_A | 120 | 106 | 3 | 5.3 | 35.3 | LOW |
| middle | T20 | 90 | 111 | 1 | 7.4 | 111.0 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| SPIN | T20 | 19 | 221 | 202 | 24.6 | 109.4 | 9.9 | 32.2 | MEDIUM |
| PACE | T20 | 26 | 223 | 197 | 14.9 | 113.2 | 14.7 | 47.2 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | LIST_A | 3 | 39 | 68 | 19.5 | 57.4 | 4.4 | 57.4 | LOW |
| PACE | LIST_A | 2 | 36 | 44 | 36.0 | 81.8 | 9.1 | 59.1 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.