I Barma betting stats, splits & projections
All-rounder
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 76 | 1062 | 1206 | 18.0 | 88.1 | 8.5 | 46.7 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 817 | 625 | 40 | 4.6 | 15.6 | HIGH |
Why we like it
Splits where I Barma scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Opposition: Malaysia (T20)HIGH sample
273 runs off 307 balls in 14 T20 matches — strike rate 88.9 vs 88.1 overall, average 27.3 vs 18.0 overall.
- Venue: Bayuemas Oval, Kuala Lumpur (T20)HIGH sample
325 runs off 353 balls in 18 T20 matches — strike rate 92.1 vs 88.1 overall, average 27.1 vs 18.0 overall.
- Bowling type: UNKNOWN (T20)MEDIUM sample
221 runs off 190 balls in 28 T20 matches — strike rate 116.3 vs 88.1 overall, average 36.8 vs 18.0 overall.
- Phase: death (T20)MEDIUM sample
230 runs off 184 balls in 21 T20 matches — strike rate 125.0 vs 88.1 overall, average 19.2 vs 18.0 overall.
- Opposition: Kuwait (T20)LOW sample
73 runs off 72 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 101.4 vs 88.1 overall, average 73.0 vs 18.0 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)HIGH sample
490 runs off 639 balls in 60 T20 matches — strike rate 76.7 vs 88.1 overall, average 14.4 vs 18.0 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)HIGH sample
251 runs off 331 balls in 47 T20 matches — strike rate 75.8 vs 88.1 overall, average 12.0 vs 18.0 overall.
- Venue: Tribhuvan University International Cricket Ground, Kirtipur (T20)MEDIUM sample
174 runs off 229 balls in 15 T20 matches — strike rate 76.0 vs 88.1 overall, average 11.6 vs 18.0 overall.
- Opposition: Uganda (T20)LOW sample
48 runs off 86 balls in 7 T20 matches — strike rate 55.8 vs 88.1 overall, average 6.9 vs 18.0 overall.
- Opposition: Thailand (T20)LOW sample
51 runs off 85 balls in 7 T20 matches — strike rate 60.0 vs 88.1 overall, average 7.3 vs 18.0 overall.
- Venue: Entebbe Cricket Oval (T20)LOW sample
84 runs off 113 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 74.3 vs 88.1 overall, average 14.0 vs 18.0 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Malaysia | T20 | 14 | 273 | 307 | 27.3 | 88.9 | 6.8 | 37.1 | HIGH |
| Hong Kong | T20 | 9 | 133 | 159 | 19.0 | 83.6 | 6.3 | 50.3 | MEDIUM |
| Netherlands | T20 | 4 | 82 | 88 | 20.5 | 93.2 | 9.1 | 48.9 | LOW |
| Uganda | T20 | 7 | 48 | 86 | 6.9 | 55.8 | 4.7 | 65.1 | LOW |
| Thailand | T20 | 7 | 51 | 85 | 7.3 | 60.0 | 5.9 | 64.7 | LOW |
| Kuwait | T20 | 3 | 73 | 72 | 73.0 | 101.4 | 6.9 | 31.9 | LOW |
| Japan | T20 | 2 | 39 | 52 | 19.5 | 75.0 | 5.8 | 48.1 | LOW |
| Rwanda | T20 | 2 | 34 | 48 | — | 70.8 | 8.3 | 58.3 | LOW |
| Indonesia | T20 | 1 | 42 | 43 | — | 97.7 | 11.6 | 39.5 | LOW |
| United Arab Emirates | T20 | 2 | 36 | 38 | 36.0 | 94.7 | 5.3 | 39.5 | LOW |
| Bhutan | T20 | 4 | 26 | 33 | 6.5 | 78.8 | 6.1 | 48.5 | LOW |
Bowling
| Malaysia | T20 | 134 | 93 | 2 | 4.2 | 46.5 | LOW |
| Uganda | T20 | 132 | 92 | 6 | 4.2 | 15.3 | LOW |
| Hong Kong | T20 | 115 | 69 | 6 | 3.6 | 11.5 | LOW |
| United Arab Emirates | T20 | 60 | 50 | 6 | 5.0 | 8.3 | LOW |
| Netherlands | T20 | 52 | 72 | 1 | 8.3 | 72.0 | LOW |
| Kuwait | T20 | 48 | 24 | 4 | 3.0 | 6.0 | LOW |
| Thailand | T20 | 48 | 42 | 2 | 5.3 | 21.0 | LOW |
| Bahrain | T20 | 42 | 18 | 3 | 2.6 | 6.0 | LOW |
| Namibia | T20 | 42 | 32 | 2 | 4.6 | 16.0 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Bayuemas Oval, Kuala Lumpur | T20 | 18 | 325 | 353 | 27.1 | 92.1 | 7.9 | 38.8 | HIGH |
| Tribhuvan University International Cricket Ground, Kirtipur | T20 | 15 | 174 | 229 | 11.6 | 76.0 | 7.4 | 56.8 | MEDIUM |
| Entebbe Cricket Oval | T20 | 6 | 84 | 113 | 14.0 | 74.3 | 6.2 | 58.4 | LOW |
| YSD-UKM Cricket Oval, Bangi | T20 | 6 | 82 | 99 | 16.4 | 82.8 | 4.0 | 38.4 | LOW |
| Gahanga B Ground, Rwanda | T20 | 5 | 61 | 79 | 20.3 | 77.2 | 8.9 | 53.2 | LOW |
| Hong Kong Cricket Club | T20 | 4 | 54 | 71 | 13.5 | 76.1 | 7.0 | 53.5 | LOW |
| Terdthai Cricket Ground, Bangkok | T20 | 4 | 68 | 55 | 68.0 | 123.6 | 16.4 | 40.0 | LOW |
| Kinrara Academy Oval, Kuala Lumpur | T20 | 3 | 28 | 43 | 14.0 | 65.1 | 4.7 | 51.2 | LOW |
| UKM-YSD Cricket Oval, Bangi | T20 | 4 | 43 | 42 | 14.3 | 102.4 | 9.5 | 42.9 | LOW |
| Selangor Turf Club, Kuala Lumpur | T20 | 1 | 40 | 33 | 40.0 | 121.2 | 12.1 | 39.4 | LOW |
| Gahanga International Cricket Stadium. Rwanda | T20 | 3 | 57 | 32 | 28.5 | 178.1 | 31.3 | 28.1 | LOW |
| Rangiri Dambulla International Stadium | T20 | 3 | 20 | 30 | 6.7 | 66.7 | 6.7 | 60.0 | LOW |
Bowling
| Tribhuvan University International Cricket Ground, Kirtipur | T20 | 172 | 161 | 7 | 5.6 | 23.0 | MEDIUM |
| Entebbe Cricket Oval | T20 | 138 | 89 | 8 | 3.9 | 11.1 | LOW |
| Bayuemas Oval, Kuala Lumpur | T20 | 121 | 77 | 6 | 3.8 | 12.8 | LOW |
| YSD-UKM Cricket Oval, Bangi | T20 | 86 | 61 | 2 | 4.3 | 30.5 | LOW |
| Rangiri Dambulla International Stadium | T20 | 66 | 74 | 3 | 6.7 | 24.7 | LOW |
| Kinrara Academy Oval, Kuala Lumpur | T20 | 60 | 39 | 4 | 3.9 | 9.8 | LOW |
| Hong Kong Cricket Club | T20 | 48 | 36 | 2 | 4.5 | 18.0 | LOW |
| UKM-YSD Cricket Oval, Bangi | T20 | 48 | 30 | 4 | 3.8 | 7.5 | LOW |
| Selangor Turf Club, Kuala Lumpur | T20 | 36 | 12 | 3 | 2.0 | 4.0 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 76 | 1062 | 1206 | 18.0 | 88.1 | 8.5 | 46.7 | HIGH |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 817 | 625 | 40 | 4.6 | 15.6 | HIGH |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 49 | 581 | 691 | 22.3 | 84.1 | 7.5 | 47.5 | HIGH |
| powerplay | T20 | 47 | 251 | 331 | 12.0 | 75.8 | 7.6 | 56.8 | HIGH |
| death | T20 | 21 | 230 | 184 | 19.2 | 125.0 | 13.6 | 25.5 | MEDIUM |
Bowling
| middle | T20 | 560 | 430 | 23 | 4.6 | 18.7 | HIGH |
| death | T20 | 191 | 152 | 15 | 4.8 | 10.1 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 66 | 43 | 2 | 3.9 | 21.5 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| SPIN | T20 | 60 | 490 | 639 | 14.4 | 76.7 | 5.8 | 49.8 | HIGH |
| PACE | T20 | 58 | 351 | 377 | 18.5 | 93.1 | 9.5 | 46.2 | HIGH |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 28 | 221 | 190 | 36.8 | 116.3 | 15.3 | 37.4 | MEDIUM |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.