I Chathurani betting stats, splits & projections
Bowler
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 16 | 496 | 500 | 70.9 | 99.2 | 7.0 | 37.8 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 340 | 183 | 20 | 3.2 | 9.2 | MEDIUM |
Why we like it
Splits where I Chathurani scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Opposition: Estonia (T20)LOW sample
129 runs off 117 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 110.3 vs 99.2 overall, not yet dismissed vs 70.9 overall.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)LOW sample
72 runs off 63 balls in 9 T20 matches — strike rate 114.3 vs 99.2 overall, average 36.0 vs 70.9 overall.
- Phase: death (T20)LOW sample
131 runs off 101 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 129.7 vs 99.2 overall, average 65.5 vs 70.9 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Opposition: Greece (T20)MEDIUM sample
111 runs off 123 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 90.2 vs 99.2 overall, average 22.2 vs 70.9 overall.
- Venue: Happy Valley Ground 2 (T20)MEDIUM sample
111 runs off 123 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 90.2 vs 99.2 overall, average 22.2 vs 70.9 overall.
- Phase: middle (T20)MEDIUM sample
221 runs off 249 balls in 16 T20 matches — strike rate 88.8 vs 99.2 overall, average 44.2 vs 70.9 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Malta | T20 | 3 | 116 | 127 | 58.0 | 91.3 | 3.9 | 37.8 | MEDIUM |
| Czech Republic | T20 | 3 | 131 | 125 | — | 104.8 | 12.8 | 45.6 | MEDIUM |
| Greece | T20 | 6 | 111 | 123 | 22.2 | 90.2 | 3.3 | 37.4 | MEDIUM |
| Estonia | T20 | 3 | 129 | 117 | — | 110.3 | 7.7 | 29.9 | LOW |
Bowling
| Greece | T20 | 114 | 72 | 5 | 3.8 | 14.4 | LOW |
| Estonia | T20 | 72 | 39 | 4 | 3.3 | 9.8 | LOW |
| Czech Republic | T20 | 57 | 33 | 5 | 3.5 | 6.6 | LOW |
| Malta | T20 | 49 | 21 | 6 | 2.6 | 3.5 | LOW |
| Serbia | T20 | 48 | 18 | 0 | 2.3 | — | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Happy Valley Ground | T20 | 6 | 245 | 244 | 122.5 | 100.4 | 5.7 | 34.0 | MEDIUM |
| Scott Page Field, Vinor | T20 | 3 | 131 | 125 | — | 104.8 | 12.8 | 45.6 | MEDIUM |
| Happy Valley Ground 2 | T20 | 6 | 111 | 123 | 22.2 | 90.2 | 3.3 | 37.4 | MEDIUM |
Bowling
| Happy Valley Ground | T20 | 121 | 60 | 10 | 3.0 | 6.0 | LOW |
| Happy Valley Ground 2 | T20 | 114 | 72 | 5 | 3.8 | 14.4 | LOW |
| Scott Page Field, Vinor | T20 | 57 | 33 | 5 | 3.5 | 6.6 | LOW |
| Lisicji Jarak Cricket Ground | T20 | 48 | 18 | 0 | 2.3 | — | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 16 | 496 | 500 | 70.9 | 99.2 | 7.0 | 37.8 | HIGH |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 340 | 183 | 20 | 3.2 | 9.2 | MEDIUM |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 16 | 221 | 249 | 44.2 | 88.8 | 4.8 | 39.0 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 14 | 144 | 150 | — | 96.0 | 7.3 | 42.0 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 6 | 131 | 101 | 65.5 | 129.7 | 11.9 | 28.7 | LOW |
Bowling
| middle | T20 | 226 | 124 | 14 | 3.3 | 8.9 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 90 | 44 | 6 | 2.9 | 7.3 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 16 | 322 | 341 | 161.0 | 94.4 | 7.3 | 41.3 | HIGH |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 10 | 102 | 96 | 34.0 | 106.3 | 5.2 | 32.3 | LOW |
| SPIN | T20 | 9 | 72 | 63 | 36.0 | 114.3 | 7.9 | 27.0 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.