I Kaia betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | TEST | 3 | 312 | 514 | 62.4 | 60.7 | 7.8 | 67.9 | HIGH |
| overall | ODI | 16 | 332 | 502 | 22.1 | 66.1 | 6.6 | 59.4 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 18 | 310 | 251 | 19.4 | 123.5 | 16.3 | 39.0 | MEDIUM |
| overall | ODI | 28 | 22 | 0 | 4.7 | — | LOW |
| overall | T20 | 12 | 9 | 0 | 4.5 | — | LOW |
Why we like it
Splits where I Kaia scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Bowling type: PACE (TEST)HIGH sample
233 runs off 315 balls in 3 TEST matches — strike rate 74.0 vs 60.7 overall, average 116.5 vs 62.4 overall.
- Opposition: Bangladesh (ODI)MEDIUM sample
127 runs off 152 balls in 3 ODI matches — strike rate 83.6 vs 66.1 overall, average 42.3 vs 22.1 overall.
- Opposition: Namibia (T20)MEDIUM sample
167 runs off 134 balls in 8 T20 matches — strike rate 124.6 vs 123.5 overall, average 27.8 vs 19.4 overall.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)MEDIUM sample
208 runs off 154 balls in 17 T20 matches — strike rate 135.1 vs 123.5 overall, average 29.7 vs 19.4 overall.
- Phase: middle (ODI)MEDIUM sample
144 runs off 174 balls in 9 ODI matches — strike rate 82.8 vs 66.1 overall, average 20.6 vs 22.1 overall.
- Venue: Namibia Cricket Ground, Windhoek (T20)LOW sample
99 runs off 64 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 154.7 vs 123.5 overall, average 33.0 vs 19.4 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Phase: old_ball (TEST)HIGH sample
221 runs off 357 balls in 3 TEST matches — strike rate 61.9 vs 60.7 overall, average 44.2 vs 62.4 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (ODI)HIGH sample
181 runs off 324 balls in 15 ODI matches — strike rate 55.9 vs 66.1 overall, average 25.9 vs 22.1 overall.
- Opposition: West Indies (TEST)MEDIUM sample
172 runs off 287 balls in 2 TEST matches — strike rate 59.9 vs 60.7 overall, average 43.0 vs 62.4 overall.
- Venue: Queens Sports Club, Bulawayo (TEST)MEDIUM sample
172 runs off 287 balls in 2 TEST matches — strike rate 59.9 vs 60.7 overall, average 43.0 vs 62.4 overall.
- Bowling type: SPIN (TEST)MEDIUM sample
79 runs off 199 balls in 3 TEST matches — strike rate 39.7 vs 60.7 overall, average 26.3 vs 62.4 overall.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)LOW sample
88 runs off 76 balls in 14 T20 matches — strike rate 115.8 vs 123.5 overall, average 11.0 vs 19.4 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| West Indies | TEST | 2 | 172 | 287 | 43.0 | 59.9 | 8.0 | 70.0 | MEDIUM |
| Bangladesh | TEST | 1 | 140 | 227 | 140.0 | 61.7 | 7.5 | 65.2 | MEDIUM |
| Ireland | ODI | 5 | 104 | 165 | 26.0 | 63.0 | 4.2 | 57.0 | MEDIUM |
| Bangladesh | ODI | 3 | 127 | 152 | 42.3 | 83.6 | 10.5 | 52.6 | MEDIUM |
| Namibia | T20 | 8 | 167 | 134 | 27.8 | 124.6 | 15.7 | 38.1 | MEDIUM |
| India | ODI | 3 | 26 | 56 | 8.7 | 46.4 | 5.4 | 73.2 | LOW |
| Australia | ODI | 2 | 19 | 47 | 9.5 | 40.4 | 4.3 | 72.3 | LOW |
| United States of America | ODI | 1 | 32 | 41 | 32.0 | 78.0 | 4.9 | 51.2 | LOW |
| Ireland | T20 | 2 | 48 | 37 | 24.0 | 129.7 | 18.9 | 27.0 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Harare Sports Club | ODI | 13 | 301 | 436 | 25.1 | 69.0 | 6.7 | 57.3 | HIGH |
| Queens Sports Club, Bulawayo | TEST | 2 | 172 | 287 | 43.0 | 59.9 | 8.0 | 70.0 | MEDIUM |
| Harare Sports Club | TEST | 1 | 140 | 227 | 140.0 | 61.7 | 7.5 | 65.2 | MEDIUM |
| Namibia Cricket Ground, Windhoek | T20 | 3 | 99 | 64 | 33.0 | 154.7 | 21.9 | 31.3 | LOW |
| United Cricket Club Ground, Windhoek | T20 | 5 | 78 | 61 | 19.5 | 127.9 | 18.0 | 44.3 | LOW |
| Queens Sports Club, Bulawayo | T20 | 4 | 40 | 49 | 13.3 | 81.6 | 6.1 | 49.0 | LOW |
| Tony Ireland Stadium, Townsville | ODI | 2 | 19 | 47 | 9.5 | 40.4 | 4.3 | 72.3 | LOW |
| Harare Sports Club | T20 | 4 | 52 | 41 | 13.0 | 126.8 | 19.5 | 31.7 | LOW |
| Wanderers Cricket Ground, Windhoek | T20 | 2 | 41 | 36 | 20.5 | 113.9 | 13.9 | 38.9 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Zimbabwe | ODI | 13 | 301 | 436 | 25.1 | 69.0 | 6.7 | 57.3 | HIGH |
| Unknown | TEST | 2 | 172 | 287 | 43.0 | 59.9 | 8.0 | 70.0 | MEDIUM |
| Zimbabwe | TEST | 1 | 140 | 227 | 140.0 | 61.7 | 7.5 | 65.2 | MEDIUM |
| Unknown | T20 | 14 | 258 | 210 | 21.5 | 122.9 | 15.7 | 40.5 | MEDIUM |
| Unknown | ODI | 3 | 31 | 66 | 10.3 | 47.0 | 6.1 | 72.7 | LOW |
| Zimbabwe | T20 | 4 | 52 | 41 | 13.0 | 126.8 | 19.5 | 31.7 | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| old_ball | TEST | 3 | 221 | 357 | 44.2 | 61.9 | 8.4 | 66.9 | HIGH |
| powerplay | ODI | 15 | 181 | 324 | 25.9 | 55.9 | 6.2 | 66.7 | HIGH |
| powerplay | T20 | 16 | 211 | 181 | 23.4 | 116.6 | 14.9 | 40.3 | MEDIUM |
| middle | ODI | 9 | 144 | 174 | 20.6 | 82.8 | 6.9 | 46.0 | MEDIUM |
| new_ball | TEST | 3 | 91 | 157 | — | 58.0 | 6.4 | 70.1 | MEDIUM |
| middle | T20 | 7 | 92 | 66 | 15.3 | 139.4 | 19.7 | 34.8 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | ODI | 16 | 245 | 382 | 20.4 | 64.1 | 7.6 | 63.9 | HIGH |
| PACE | TEST | 3 | 233 | 315 | 116.5 | 74.0 | 10.5 | 63.5 | HIGH |
| SPIN | TEST | 3 | 79 | 199 | 26.3 | 39.7 | 3.5 | 74.9 | MEDIUM |
| PACE | T20 | 17 | 208 | 154 | 29.7 | 135.1 | 18.8 | 36.4 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | ODI | 7 | 87 | 120 | 29.0 | 72.5 | 3.3 | 45.0 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | T20 | 14 | 88 | 76 | 11.0 | 115.8 | 14.5 | 42.1 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.