I Majdancic betting stats, splits & projections
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 3 | 35 | 39 | 11.7 | 89.7 | 5.1 | 30.8 | LOW |
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Malta | T20 | 2 | 35 | 38 | 17.5 | 92.1 | 5.3 | 28.9 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Marsa Sports Club | T20 | 2 | 35 | 38 | 17.5 | 92.1 | 5.3 | 28.9 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 3 | 35 | 39 | 11.7 | 89.7 | 5.1 | 30.8 | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 2 | 27 | 32 | 27.0 | 84.4 | 3.1 | 28.1 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 2 | 23 | 32 | 11.5 | 71.9 | 0.0 | 31.3 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.