I Nakisuuyi betting stats, splits & projections
All-rounder
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 65 | 1089 | 1347 | 21.4 | 80.8 | 8.8 | 54.1 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 936 | 790 | 44 | 5.1 | 18.0 | HIGH |
Why we like it
Splits where I Nakisuuyi scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Opposition: Rwanda (T20)MEDIUM sample
203 runs off 207 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 98.1 vs 80.8 overall, average 67.7 vs 21.4 overall.
- Venue: Gahanga B Ground, Rwanda (T20)MEDIUM sample
147 runs off 150 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 98.0 vs 80.8 overall, average 49.0 vs 21.4 overall.
- Phase: death (T20)MEDIUM sample
187 runs off 143 balls in 17 T20 matches — strike rate 130.8 vs 80.8 overall, average 20.8 vs 21.4 overall.
- Opposition: Tanzania (T20)LOW sample
66 runs off 68 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 97.1 vs 80.8 overall, average 13.2 vs 21.4 overall.
- Opposition: United States of America (T20)LOW sample
68 runs off 64 balls in 1 T20 match — strike rate 106.3 vs 80.8 overall, not yet dismissed vs 21.4 overall.
- Venue: Zayed Cricket Stadium, Abu Dhabi (T20)LOW sample
70 runs off 74 balls in 2 T20 matches — strike rate 94.6 vs 80.8 overall, average 70.0 vs 21.4 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)HIGH sample
261 runs off 436 balls in 42 T20 matches — strike rate 59.9 vs 80.8 overall, average 21.8 vs 21.4 overall.
- Venue: Entebbe Cricket Oval (T20)MEDIUM sample
150 runs off 210 balls in 12 T20 matches — strike rate 71.4 vs 80.8 overall, average 21.4 vs 21.4 overall.
- Venue: Terdthai Cricket Ground, Bangkok (T20)MEDIUM sample
89 runs off 127 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 70.1 vs 80.8 overall, average 22.3 vs 21.4 overall.
- Opposition: Canada (T20)LOW sample
81 runs off 118 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 68.6 vs 80.8 overall, average 16.2 vs 21.4 overall.
- Opposition: Nigeria (T20)LOW sample
72 runs off 112 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 64.3 vs 80.8 overall, average 24.0 vs 21.4 overall.
- Opposition: Zimbabwe (T20)LOW sample
48 runs off 74 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 64.9 vs 80.8 overall, average 16.0 vs 21.4 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Namibia | T20 | 16 | 229 | 301 | 17.6 | 76.1 | 8.0 | 56.1 | HIGH |
| Rwanda | T20 | 6 | 203 | 207 | 67.7 | 98.1 | 10.6 | 45.4 | MEDIUM |
| Canada | T20 | 5 | 81 | 118 | 16.2 | 68.6 | 5.9 | 59.3 | LOW |
| Nigeria | T20 | 4 | 72 | 112 | 24.0 | 64.3 | 7.1 | 63.4 | LOW |
| Hong Kong | T20 | 5 | 81 | 93 | 20.3 | 87.1 | 10.8 | 55.9 | LOW |
| Zimbabwe | T20 | 3 | 48 | 74 | 16.0 | 64.9 | 6.8 | 60.8 | LOW |
| Tanzania | T20 | 6 | 66 | 68 | 13.2 | 97.1 | 8.8 | 42.6 | LOW |
| United States of America | T20 | 1 | 68 | 64 | — | 106.3 | 12.5 | 40.6 | LOW |
| Scotland | T20 | 2 | 43 | 53 | 21.5 | 81.1 | 7.5 | 50.9 | LOW |
| Kenya | T20 | 3 | 63 | 52 | 63.0 | 121.2 | 17.3 | 46.2 | LOW |
| Nepal | T20 | 2 | 26 | 47 | 26.0 | 55.3 | 6.4 | 66.0 | LOW |
| Papua New Guinea | T20 | 1 | 20 | 31 | 20.0 | 64.5 | 6.5 | 58.1 | LOW |
Bowling
| Namibia | T20 | 246 | 209 | 7 | 5.1 | 29.9 | MEDIUM |
| Hong Kong | T20 | 84 | 69 | 4 | 4.9 | 17.3 | LOW |
| Tanzania | T20 | 84 | 67 | 5 | 4.8 | 13.4 | LOW |
| Rwanda | T20 | 72 | 65 | 9 | 5.4 | 7.2 | LOW |
| Canada | T20 | 66 | 48 | 4 | 4.4 | 12.0 | LOW |
| Kenya | T20 | 48 | 38 | 2 | 4.8 | 19.0 | LOW |
| Nepal | T20 | 48 | 29 | 3 | 3.6 | 9.7 | LOW |
| Scotland | T20 | 48 | 47 | 2 | 5.9 | 23.5 | LOW |
| Nigeria | T20 | 42 | 35 | 2 | 5.0 | 17.5 | LOW |
| Zimbabwe | T20 | 42 | 27 | 3 | 3.9 | 9.0 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| High Performance Oval, Windhoek | T20 | 11 | 176 | 217 | 19.6 | 81.1 | 7.8 | 51.6 | MEDIUM |
| Entebbe Cricket Oval | T20 | 12 | 150 | 210 | 21.4 | 71.4 | 7.6 | 59.5 | MEDIUM |
| Gahanga B Ground, Rwanda | T20 | 4 | 147 | 150 | 49.0 | 98.0 | 11.3 | 49.3 | MEDIUM |
| Terdthai Cricket Ground, Bangkok | T20 | 4 | 89 | 127 | 22.3 | 70.1 | 7.1 | 56.7 | MEDIUM |
| Lugogo Cricket Oval, Kampala | T20 | 5 | 81 | 118 | 16.2 | 68.6 | 5.9 | 59.3 | LOW |
| Gahanga International Cricket Stadium. Rwanda | T20 | 7 | 101 | 117 | 16.8 | 86.3 | 12.0 | 50.4 | LOW |
| Achimota Senior Secondary School A Field, Accra | T20 | 3 | 38 | 86 | 12.7 | 44.2 | 1.2 | 66.3 | LOW |
| Zayed Cricket Stadium, Abu Dhabi | T20 | 2 | 70 | 74 | 70.0 | 94.6 | 10.8 | 45.9 | LOW |
| Namibia Cricket Ground, Windhoek | T20 | 5 | 97 | 73 | 24.3 | 132.9 | 17.8 | 37.0 | LOW |
| United Cricket Club Ground, Windhoek | T20 | 5 | 50 | 72 | 12.5 | 69.4 | 8.3 | 63.9 | LOW |
| Achimota Senior Secondary School B Field, Accra | T20 | 1 | 57 | 56 | — | 101.8 | 14.3 | 50.0 | LOW |
Bowling
| High Performance Oval, Windhoek | T20 | 228 | 214 | 7 | 5.6 | 30.6 | MEDIUM |
| Entebbe Cricket Oval | T20 | 162 | 92 | 9 | 3.4 | 10.2 | MEDIUM |
| Namibia Cricket Ground, Windhoek | T20 | 96 | 103 | 3 | 6.4 | 34.3 | LOW |
| Terdthai Cricket Ground, Bangkok | T20 | 90 | 73 | 4 | 4.9 | 18.3 | LOW |
| Lugogo Cricket Oval, Kampala | T20 | 66 | 48 | 4 | 4.4 | 12.0 | LOW |
| Achimota Senior Secondary School A Field, Accra | T20 | 60 | 49 | 2 | 4.9 | 24.5 | LOW |
| Asian Institute of Technology Ground, Bangkok | T20 | 60 | 54 | 3 | 5.4 | 18.0 | LOW |
| Gahanga B Ground, Rwanda | T20 | 54 | 35 | 3 | 3.9 | 11.7 | LOW |
| Gahanga International Cricket Stadium. Rwanda | T20 | 36 | 37 | 4 | 6.2 | 9.3 | LOW |
| Zayed Cricket Stadium, Abu Dhabi | T20 | 36 | 41 | 0 | 6.8 | — | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 65 | 1089 | 1347 | 21.4 | 80.8 | 8.8 | 54.1 | HIGH |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 936 | 790 | 44 | 5.1 | 18.0 | HIGH |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 49 | 641 | 768 | 21.4 | 83.5 | 8.7 | 51.8 | HIGH |
| powerplay | T20 | 42 | 261 | 436 | 21.8 | 59.9 | 6.0 | 62.8 | HIGH |
| death | T20 | 17 | 187 | 143 | 20.8 | 130.8 | 18.2 | 39.9 | MEDIUM |
Bowling
| middle | T20 | 672 | 546 | 30 | 4.9 | 18.2 | HIGH |
| death | T20 | 150 | 151 | 10 | 6.0 | 15.1 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 114 | 93 | 4 | 4.9 | 23.3 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| SPIN | T20 | 51 | 529 | 709 | 18.2 | 74.6 | 6.3 | 53.7 | HIGH |
| PACE | T20 | 54 | 445 | 501 | 26.2 | 88.8 | 12.0 | 55.1 | HIGH |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 25 | 115 | 137 | 23.0 | 83.9 | 10.2 | 52.6 | MEDIUM |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.