I Vrignaud betting stats, splits & projections
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 8 | 99 | 170 | 16.5 | 58.2 | 4.1 | 56.5 | MEDIUM |
Why we like it
Splits where I Vrignaud scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Opposition: Luxembourg (T20)LOW sample
55 runs off 78 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 70.5 vs 58.2 overall, average 13.8 vs 16.5 overall.
- Venue: Pierre Werner Cricket Ground (T20)LOW sample
55 runs off 78 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 70.5 vs 58.2 overall, average 13.8 vs 16.5 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Venue: Scott Page Field, Vinor (T20)LOW sample
44 runs off 92 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 47.8 vs 58.2 overall, average 22.0 vs 16.5 overall.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)LOW sample
55 runs off 116 balls in 7 T20 matches — strike rate 47.4 vs 58.2 overall, average 18.3 vs 16.5 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Portugal | T20 | 3 | 42 | 83 | 42.0 | 50.6 | 2.4 | 57.8 | LOW |
| Luxembourg | T20 | 4 | 55 | 78 | 13.8 | 70.5 | 6.4 | 52.6 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Scott Page Field, Vinor | T20 | 4 | 44 | 92 | 22.0 | 47.8 | 2.2 | 59.8 | LOW |
| Pierre Werner Cricket Ground | T20 | 4 | 55 | 78 | 13.8 | 70.5 | 6.4 | 52.6 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 8 | 99 | 170 | 16.5 | 58.2 | 4.1 | 56.5 | MEDIUM |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 7 | 49 | 85 | 24.5 | 57.6 | 2.4 | 54.1 | LOW |
| death | T20 | 6 | 47 | 77 | 11.8 | 61.0 | 6.5 | 58.4 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 7 | 55 | 116 | 18.3 | 47.4 | 1.7 | 56.0 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 3 | 30 | 36 | 30.0 | 83.3 | 11.1 | 61.1 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.