Ibrahim Rahimi betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 26 | 476 | 291 | 20.7 | 163.6 | 22.3 | 41.9 | MEDIUM |
| overall | T20 | 18 | 40 | 1 | 13.3 | 40.0 | LOW |
Why we like it
Splits where Ibrahim Rahimi scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Phase: death (T20)MEDIUM sample
229 runs off 120 balls in 13 T20 matches — strike rate 190.8 vs 163.6 overall, average 22.9 vs 20.7 overall.
- Opposition: France (T20)LOW sample
122 runs off 63 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 193.7 vs 163.6 overall, average 30.5 vs 20.7 overall.
- Venue: Botkyrka Cricket Center, Stockholm (T20)LOW sample
147 runs off 86 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 170.9 vs 163.6 overall, average 36.8 vs 20.7 overall.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)LOW sample
197 runs off 113 balls in 16 T20 matches — strike rate 174.3 vs 163.6 overall, average 28.1 vs 20.7 overall.
- Phase: middle (T20)LOW sample
148 runs off 99 balls in 11 T20 matches — strike rate 149.5 vs 163.6 overall, average 29.6 vs 20.7 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)MEDIUM sample
264 runs off 172 balls in 21 T20 matches — strike rate 153.5 vs 163.6 overall, average 18.9 vs 20.7 overall.
- Opposition: Austria (T20)LOW sample
92 runs off 68 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 135.3 vs 163.6 overall, average 23.0 vs 20.7 overall.
- Venue: Scott Page Field, Vinor (T20)LOW sample
101 runs off 66 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 153.0 vs 163.6 overall, average 25.3 vs 20.7 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)LOW sample
99 runs off 72 balls in 9 T20 matches — strike rate 137.5 vs 163.6 overall, average 12.4 vs 20.7 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Austria | T20 | 4 | 92 | 68 | 23.0 | 135.3 | 20.6 | 48.5 | LOW |
| France | T20 | 5 | 122 | 63 | 30.5 | 193.7 | 27.0 | 38.1 | LOW |
| Sweden | T20 | 4 | 84 | 59 | 42.0 | 142.4 | 15.3 | 37.3 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Botkyrka Cricket Center, Stockholm | T20 | 6 | 147 | 86 | 36.8 | 170.9 | 23.3 | 43.0 | LOW |
| Scott Page Field, Vinor | T20 | 4 | 101 | 66 | 25.3 | 153.0 | 19.7 | 39.4 | LOW |
| Santarem Cricket Ground | T20 | 5 | 76 | 48 | 15.2 | 158.3 | 20.8 | 39.6 | LOW |
| Ishoj Cricket Club, Vejledalen | T20 | 3 | 34 | 31 | 11.3 | 109.7 | 16.1 | 58.1 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 26 | 476 | 291 | 20.7 | 163.6 | 22.3 | 41.9 | MEDIUM |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| death | T20 | 13 | 229 | 120 | 22.9 | 190.8 | 25.0 | 35.8 | MEDIUM |
| middle | T20 | 11 | 148 | 99 | 29.6 | 149.5 | 21.2 | 43.4 | LOW |
| powerplay | T20 | 9 | 99 | 72 | 12.4 | 137.5 | 19.4 | 50.0 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 21 | 264 | 172 | 18.9 | 153.5 | 19.2 | 42.4 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | T20 | 16 | 197 | 113 | 28.1 | 174.3 | 25.7 | 41.6 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.