IC Gaze betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 76 | 1127 | 1017 | 18.8 | 110.8 | 16.0 | 44.5 | HIGH |
| overall | ODI | 18 | 219 | 341 | 15.6 | 64.2 | 4.7 | 57.2 | HIGH |
Why we like it
Splits where IC Gaze scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)HIGH sample
405 runs off 331 balls in 55 T20 matches — strike rate 122.4 vs 110.8 overall, average 18.4 vs 18.8 overall.
- Opposition: Zimbabwe (T20)MEDIUM sample
189 runs off 123 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 153.7 vs 110.8 overall, not yet dismissed vs 18.8 overall.
- Venue: Seddon Park, Hamilton (T20)MEDIUM sample
199 runs off 135 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 147.4 vs 110.8 overall, average 99.5 vs 18.8 overall.
- Phase: death (T20)MEDIUM sample
204 runs off 171 balls in 21 T20 matches — strike rate 119.3 vs 110.8 overall, average 22.7 vs 18.8 overall.
- Opposition: England (ODI)LOW sample
81 runs off 98 balls in 5 ODI matches — strike rate 82.7 vs 64.2 overall, average 16.2 vs 15.6 overall.
- Opposition: Central Districts (T20)LOW sample
120 runs off 95 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 126.3 vs 110.8 overall, average 24.0 vs 18.8 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Opposition: England (T20)MEDIUM sample
173 runs off 170 balls in 14 T20 matches — strike rate 101.8 vs 110.8 overall, average 17.3 vs 18.8 overall.
- Phase: middle (ODI)MEDIUM sample
128 runs off 236 balls in 13 ODI matches — strike rate 54.2 vs 64.2 overall, average 11.6 vs 15.6 overall.
- Opposition: India (ODI)LOW sample
45 runs off 94 balls in 3 ODI matches — strike rate 47.9 vs 64.2 overall, average 15.0 vs 15.6 overall.
- Opposition: Northern Districts (T20)LOW sample
86 runs off 91 balls in 7 T20 matches — strike rate 94.5 vs 110.8 overall, average 17.2 vs 18.8 overall.
- Opposition: Canterbury (T20)LOW sample
75 runs off 90 balls in 8 T20 matches — strike rate 83.3 vs 110.8 overall, average 10.7 vs 18.8 overall.
- Venue: Narendra Modi Stadium, Ahmedabad (ODI)LOW sample
45 runs off 94 balls in 3 ODI matches — strike rate 47.9 vs 64.2 overall, average 15.0 vs 15.6 overall.
Current projections
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| England | T20 | 14 | 173 | 170 | 17.3 | 101.8 | 12.9 | 47.1 | MEDIUM |
| Otago | T20 | 11 | 165 | 147 | 15.0 | 112.2 | 17.7 | 45.6 | MEDIUM |
| Zimbabwe | T20 | 3 | 189 | 123 | — | 153.7 | 21.1 | 22.8 | MEDIUM |
| Wellington | T20 | 8 | 124 | 120 | 15.5 | 103.3 | 16.7 | 51.7 | MEDIUM |
| England | ODI | 5 | 81 | 98 | 16.2 | 82.7 | 6.1 | 44.9 | LOW |
| Central Districts | T20 | 6 | 120 | 95 | 24.0 | 126.3 | 18.9 | 37.9 | LOW |
| India | ODI | 3 | 45 | 94 | 15.0 | 47.9 | 3.2 | 66.0 | LOW |
| Northern Districts | T20 | 7 | 86 | 91 | 17.2 | 94.5 | 15.4 | 53.8 | LOW |
| Canterbury | T20 | 8 | 75 | 90 | 10.7 | 83.3 | 11.1 | 55.6 | LOW |
| West Indies | T20 | 3 | 74 | 57 | 37.0 | 129.8 | 21.1 | 43.9 | LOW |
| Sri Lanka | ODI | 2 | 43 | 51 | 43.0 | 84.3 | 5.9 | 45.1 | LOW |
| South Africa | T20 | 6 | 36 | 41 | 7.2 | 87.8 | 12.2 | 53.7 | LOW |
| Pakistan | ODI | 3 | 16 | 38 | 16.0 | 42.1 | 0.0 | 71.1 | LOW |
| Sri Lanka | T20 | 3 | 33 | 30 | 16.5 | 110.0 | 13.3 | 33.3 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Eden Park Outer Oval, Auckland | T20 | 15 | 251 | 223 | 17.9 | 112.6 | 18.8 | 49.8 | MEDIUM |
| Seddon Park, Hamilton | T20 | 6 | 199 | 135 | 99.5 | 147.4 | 20.7 | 27.4 | MEDIUM |
| Hagley Oval, Christchurch | T20 | 8 | 114 | 101 | 16.3 | 112.9 | 18.8 | 49.5 | LOW |
| Narendra Modi Stadium, Ahmedabad | ODI | 3 | 45 | 94 | 15.0 | 47.9 | 3.2 | 66.0 | LOW |
| Basin Reserve, Wellington | T20 | 5 | 88 | 80 | 22.0 | 110.0 | 13.8 | 38.8 | LOW |
| Saxton Oval, Nelson | ODI | 2 | 43 | 51 | 43.0 | 84.3 | 5.9 | 45.1 | LOW |
| Kennington Oval, London | T20 | 2 | 53 | 51 | 53.0 | 103.9 | 11.8 | 41.2 | LOW |
| Seddon Park, Hamilton | ODI | 1 | 47 | 48 | 47.0 | 97.9 | 6.3 | 33.3 | LOW |
| McLean Park, Napier | T20 | 3 | 47 | 48 | 15.7 | 97.9 | 10.4 | 45.8 | LOW |
| University Oval, Dunedin | T20 | 3 | 57 | 48 | 19.0 | 118.8 | 22.9 | 43.8 | LOW |
| Hagley Oval, Christchurch | ODI | 2 | 15 | 37 | 15.0 | 40.5 | 0.0 | 73.0 | LOW |
| John Davies Oval, Queenstown | T20 | 2 | 38 | 37 | 19.0 | 102.7 | 10.8 | 35.1 | LOW |
| The Rose Bowl, Southampton | T20 | 4 | 44 | 36 | 11.0 | 122.2 | 25.0 | 58.3 | LOW |
| Basin Reserve, Wellington | ODI | 2 | 19 | 32 | 9.5 | 59.4 | 3.1 | 53.1 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 74 | 1107 | 1002 | 18.8 | 110.5 | 16.1 | 44.8 | HIGH |
| Unknown | ODI | 18 | 219 | 341 | 15.6 | 64.2 | 4.7 | 57.2 | HIGH |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| powerplay | T20 | 44 | 587 | 522 | 21.0 | 112.5 | 19.3 | 53.1 | HIGH |
| middle | T20 | 36 | 336 | 324 | 14.6 | 103.7 | 12.7 | 38.9 | HIGH |
| middle | ODI | 13 | 128 | 236 | 11.6 | 54.2 | 3.0 | 61.4 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 21 | 204 | 171 | 22.7 | 119.3 | 12.3 | 29.2 | MEDIUM |
| death | ODI | 6 | 82 | 77 | 27.3 | 106.5 | 11.7 | 36.4 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| SPIN | T20 | 62 | 592 | 566 | 16.9 | 104.6 | 14.0 | 44.9 | HIGH |
| PACE | T20 | 55 | 405 | 331 | 18.4 | 122.4 | 20.5 | 45.0 | HIGH |
| SPIN | ODI | 17 | 139 | 223 | 17.4 | 62.3 | 3.6 | 56.5 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 24 | 130 | 120 | 43.3 | 108.3 | 13.3 | 41.7 | MEDIUM |
| PACE | ODI | 12 | 70 | 88 | 17.5 | 79.5 | 9.1 | 54.5 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | ODI | 4 | 10 | 30 | 5.0 | 33.3 | 0.0 | 70.0 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.