IDM Latin betting stats, splits & projections
All-rounder
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 40 | 837 | 680 | 25.4 | 123.1 | 14.9 | 39.0 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 329 | 493 | 22 | 9.0 | 22.4 | MEDIUM |
Why we like it
Splits where IDM Latin scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Phase: middle (T20)HIGH sample
547 runs off 473 balls in 33 T20 matches — strike rate 115.6 vs 123.1 overall, average 34.2 vs 25.4 overall.
- Bowling type: UNKNOWN (T20)MEDIUM sample
180 runs off 132 balls in 22 T20 matches — strike rate 136.4 vs 123.1 overall, average 18.0 vs 25.4 overall.
- Phase: death (T20)MEDIUM sample
216 runs off 137 balls in 17 T20 matches — strike rate 157.7 vs 123.1 overall, average 16.6 vs 25.4 overall.
- Opposition: Bulgaria (T20)LOW sample
107 runs off 79 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 135.4 vs 123.1 overall, average 35.7 vs 25.4 overall.
- Opposition: Turkey (T20)LOW sample
92 runs off 64 balls in 2 T20 matches — strike rate 143.8 vs 123.1 overall, average 46.0 vs 25.4 overall.
- Venue: Vassil Levski National Sports Academy, Sofia (T20)LOW sample
174 runs off 117 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 148.7 vs 123.1 overall, average 43.5 vs 25.4 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Venue: Marsa Sports Club (T20)LOW sample
124 runs off 110 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 112.7 vs 123.1 overall, average 24.8 vs 25.4 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)LOW sample
74 runs off 70 balls in 8 T20 matches — strike rate 105.7 vs 123.1 overall, average 18.5 vs 25.4 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Malta | T20 | 10 | 271 | 208 | 30.1 | 130.3 | 14.4 | 37.5 | MEDIUM |
| Bulgaria | T20 | 4 | 107 | 79 | 35.7 | 135.4 | 19.0 | 34.2 | LOW |
| Serbia | T20 | 5 | 77 | 66 | 38.5 | 116.7 | 12.1 | 37.9 | LOW |
| Turkey | T20 | 2 | 92 | 64 | 46.0 | 143.8 | 25.0 | 37.5 | LOW |
| Portugal | T20 | 6 | 35 | 52 | 5.8 | 67.3 | 7.7 | 65.4 | LOW |
| Belgium | T20 | 2 | 50 | 42 | 25.0 | 119.0 | 9.5 | 35.7 | LOW |
| Estonia | T20 | 2 | 52 | 40 | 26.0 | 130.0 | 17.5 | 35.0 | LOW |
| Germany | T20 | 1 | 58 | 38 | — | 152.6 | 18.4 | 21.1 | LOW |
Bowling
| Malta | T20 | 105 | 165 | 8 | 9.4 | 20.6 | LOW |
| Portugal | T20 | 62 | 67 | 6 | 6.5 | 11.2 | LOW |
| Belgium | T20 | 36 | 63 | 2 | 10.5 | 31.5 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Europa Sports Complex | T20 | 12 | 269 | 208 | 26.9 | 129.3 | 15.9 | 38.9 | MEDIUM |
| Vassil Levski National Sports Academy, Sofia | T20 | 5 | 174 | 117 | 43.5 | 148.7 | 24.8 | 36.8 | LOW |
| Marsa Sports Club | T20 | 6 | 124 | 110 | 24.8 | 112.7 | 10.0 | 40.0 | LOW |
| Bayer Uerdingen Cricket Ground | T20 | 4 | 112 | 85 | 37.3 | 131.8 | 15.3 | 30.6 | LOW |
| Koge Cricket Club | T20 | 3 | 37 | 47 | 18.5 | 78.7 | 4.3 | 44.7 | LOW |
| Royal Brussels Cricket Club Ground, Waterloo | T20 | 3 | 52 | 42 | 26.0 | 123.8 | 14.3 | 42.9 | LOW |
Bowling
| Marsa Sports Club | T20 | 90 | 125 | 7 | 8.3 | 17.9 | LOW |
| Koge Cricket Club | T20 | 60 | 86 | 3 | 8.6 | 28.7 | LOW |
| Santarem Cricket Ground | T20 | 60 | 61 | 6 | 6.1 | 10.2 | LOW |
| Royal Brussels Cricket Club Ground, Waterloo | T20 | 57 | 107 | 5 | 11.3 | 21.4 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 40 | 837 | 680 | 25.4 | 123.1 | 14.9 | 39.0 | HIGH |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 329 | 493 | 22 | 9.0 | 22.4 | MEDIUM |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 33 | 547 | 473 | 34.2 | 115.6 | 14.0 | 40.2 | HIGH |
| death | T20 | 17 | 216 | 137 | 16.6 | 157.7 | 19.0 | 30.7 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 8 | 74 | 70 | 18.5 | 105.7 | 12.9 | 47.1 | LOW |
Bowling
| middle | T20 | 264 | 400 | 14 | 9.1 | 28.6 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 59 | 90 | 7 | 9.2 | 12.9 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 32 | 348 | 291 | 31.6 | 119.6 | 13.1 | 36.4 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | T20 | 29 | 309 | 257 | 25.8 | 120.2 | 16.3 | 44.0 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 22 | 180 | 132 | 18.0 | 136.4 | 15.9 | 34.8 | MEDIUM |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.