IECM Wong betting stats, splits & projections
Bowler
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | LIST_A | 23 | 211 | 267 | 11.1 | 79.0 | 7.9 | 53.9 | MEDIUM |
| overall | TEST | 1 | 8 | 66 | 8.0 | 12.1 | 1.5 | 92.4 | LOW |
| overall | T20 | 8 | 45 | 37 | 9.0 | 121.6 | 10.8 | 37.8 | LOW |
| overall | ODI | 1 | 15 | 8 | 15.0 | 187.5 | 12.5 | 12.5 | LOW |
| overall | LIST_A | 1150 | 996 | 33 | 5.2 | 30.2 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 395 | 472 | 15 | 7.2 | 31.5 | HIGH |
| overall | TEST | 319 | 209 | 5 | 3.9 | 41.8 | MEDIUM |
| overall | ODI | 114 | 121 | 4 | 6.4 | 30.3 | LOW |
Why we like it
Splits where IECM Wong scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Bowling type: PACE (LIST A)LOW sample
92 runs off 90 balls in 9 LIST A matches — strike rate 102.2 vs 79.0 overall, average 18.4 vs 11.1 overall.
- Phase: death (LIST A)LOW sample
88 runs off 95 balls in 13 LIST A matches — strike rate 92.6 vs 79.0 overall, average 7.3 vs 11.1 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Bowling type: SPIN (LIST A)MEDIUM sample
110 runs off 170 balls in 21 LIST A matches — strike rate 64.7 vs 79.0 overall, average 10.0 vs 11.1 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| South East Stars | LIST_A | 4 | 106 | 123 | 35.3 | 86.2 | 8.9 | 51.2 | MEDIUM |
| India | TEST | 1 | 8 | 66 | 8.0 | 12.1 | 1.5 | 92.4 | LOW |
| The Blaze | LIST_A | 3 | 38 | 52 | 12.7 | 73.1 | 7.7 | 59.6 | LOW |
| Southern Vipers | LIST_A | 4 | 23 | 35 | 7.7 | 65.7 | 5.7 | 54.3 | LOW |
Bowling
| Northern Diamonds | LIST_A | 222 | 235 | 7 | 6.4 | 33.6 | MEDIUM |
| Southern Vipers | LIST_A | 210 | 159 | 7 | 4.5 | 22.7 | MEDIUM |
| South Africa | TEST | 163 | 100 | 3 | 3.7 | 33.3 | MEDIUM |
| Thunder | LIST_A | 162 | 110 | 5 | 4.1 | 22.0 | MEDIUM |
| South East Stars | LIST_A | 160 | 136 | 4 | 5.1 | 34.0 | MEDIUM |
| India | TEST | 156 | 109 | 2 | 4.2 | 54.5 | MEDIUM |
| India | T20 | 120 | 185 | 4 | 9.3 | 46.3 | LOW |
| The Blaze | LIST_A | 114 | 86 | 2 | 4.5 | 43.0 | LOW |
| Lightning | LIST_A | 102 | 118 | 3 | 6.9 | 39.3 | LOW |
| Central Sparks | LIST_A | 84 | 78 | 4 | 5.6 | 19.5 | LOW |
| South Africa | ODI | 84 | 86 | 4 | 6.1 | 21.5 | LOW |
| West Indies | T20 | 72 | 58 | 3 | 4.8 | 19.3 | LOW |
| New Zealand | T20 | 71 | 73 | 3 | 6.2 | 24.3 | LOW |
| South Africa | T20 | 60 | 79 | 1 | 7.9 | 79.0 | LOW |
| Sunrisers | LIST_A | 48 | 33 | 1 | 4.1 | 33.0 | LOW |
| Western Storm | LIST_A | 48 | 41 | 0 | 5.1 | — | LOW |
| Ireland | T20 | 42 | 43 | 2 | 6.1 | 21.5 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Lord's, London | TEST | 1 | 8 | 66 | 8.0 | 12.1 | 1.5 | 92.4 | LOW |
| Woodbridge Road, Guildford | LIST_A | 1 | 50 | 48 | 50.0 | 104.2 | 10.4 | 45.8 | LOW |
| Edgbaston, Birmingham | LIST_A | 4 | 32 | 42 | 10.7 | 76.2 | 2.4 | 40.5 | LOW |
| Kent County Cricket Ground, Beckenham | LIST_A | 1 | 34 | 42 | — | 81.0 | 9.5 | 52.4 | LOW |
| County Ground, New Road, Worcester | LIST_A | 3 | 32 | 40 | 10.7 | 80.0 | 10.0 | 60.0 | LOW |
| Trent Bridge, Nottingham | LIST_A | 1 | 22 | 31 | 22.0 | 71.0 | 12.9 | 74.2 | LOW |
Bowling
| Edgbaston, Birmingham | LIST_A | 210 | 155 | 4 | 4.4 | 38.8 | MEDIUM |
| County Ground, New Road, Worcester | LIST_A | 174 | 131 | 7 | 4.5 | 18.7 | MEDIUM |
| The Cooper Associates County Ground, Taunton | TEST | 163 | 100 | 3 | 3.7 | 33.3 | MEDIUM |
| Lord's, London | TEST | 156 | 109 | 2 | 4.2 | 54.5 | MEDIUM |
| County Ground, Hove | LIST_A | 96 | 49 | 4 | 3.1 | 12.3 | LOW |
| Edgbaston, Birmingham | T20 | 95 | 125 | 4 | 7.9 | 31.3 | LOW |
| Headingley, Leeds | LIST_A | 90 | 85 | 5 | 5.7 | 17.0 | LOW |
| Sir Paul Getty's Ground, Wormsley | LIST_A | 72 | 73 | 3 | 6.1 | 24.3 | LOW |
| College Ground, Cheltenham | LIST_A | 66 | 71 | 1 | 6.5 | 71.0 | LOW |
| Haslegrave Ground, Loughborough | LIST_A | 60 | 61 | 3 | 6.1 | 20.3 | LOW |
| The Cooper Associates County Ground, Taunton | LIST_A | 60 | 58 | 1 | 5.8 | 58.0 | LOW |
| County Ground, Chelmsford | T20 | 54 | 84 | 1 | 9.3 | 84.0 | LOW |
| Kent County Cricket Ground, Beckenham | LIST_A | 52 | 47 | 1 | 5.4 | 47.0 | LOW |
| Merchant Taylors' School Ground, Northwood | LIST_A | 48 | 33 | 1 | 4.1 | 33.0 | LOW |
| Old Trafford, Manchester | LIST_A | 48 | 44 | 1 | 5.5 | 44.0 | LOW |
| Grace Road, Leicester | ODI | 48 | 50 | 1 | 6.3 | 50.0 | LOW |
| County Ground, Hove | T20 | 48 | 30 | 2 | 3.8 | 15.0 | LOW |
| Grace Road, Leicester | LIST_A | 42 | 57 | 0 | 8.1 | — | LOW |
| New County Ground, Hove, Brighton | LIST_A | 42 | 37 | 0 | 5.3 | — | LOW |
| Woodbridge Road, Guildford | LIST_A | 42 | 37 | 2 | 5.3 | 18.5 | LOW |
| Castle Avenue, Dublin | T20 | 42 | 43 | 2 | 6.1 | 21.5 | LOW |
| St Lawrence Ground, Canterbury | T20 | 42 | 59 | 1 | 8.4 | 59.0 | LOW |
| County Ground, Bristol | ODI | 36 | 36 | 3 | 6.0 | 12.0 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | LIST_A | 23 | 211 | 267 | 11.1 | 79.0 | 7.9 | 53.9 | MEDIUM |
| Unknown | TEST | 1 | 8 | 66 | 8.0 | 12.1 | 1.5 | 92.4 | LOW |
| Unknown | T20 | 8 | 45 | 37 | 9.0 | 121.6 | 10.8 | 37.8 | LOW |
Bowling
| Unknown | LIST_A | 1150 | 996 | 33 | 5.2 | 30.2 | HIGH |
| Unknown | T20 | 395 | 472 | 15 | 7.2 | 31.5 | HIGH |
| Unknown | TEST | 319 | 209 | 5 | 3.9 | 41.8 | MEDIUM |
| Unknown | ODI | 114 | 121 | 4 | 6.4 | 30.3 | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | LIST_A | 11 | 101 | 141 | 16.8 | 71.6 | 7.8 | 56.0 | MEDIUM |
| death | LIST_A | 13 | 88 | 95 | 7.3 | 92.6 | 6.3 | 44.2 | LOW |
| old_ball | TEST | 1 | 8 | 66 | 8.0 | 12.1 | 1.5 | 92.4 | LOW |
| powerplay | LIST_A | 1 | 22 | 31 | 22.0 | 71.0 | 12.9 | 74.2 | LOW |
Bowling
| powerplay | LIST_A | 570 | 443 | 15 | 4.7 | 29.5 | HIGH |
| middle | LIST_A | 467 | 406 | 9 | 5.2 | 45.1 | HIGH |
| old_ball | TEST | 271 | 178 | 5 | 3.9 | 35.6 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 156 | 187 | 6 | 7.2 | 31.2 | MEDIUM |
| middle | T20 | 155 | 190 | 4 | 7.4 | 47.5 | MEDIUM |
| death | LIST_A | 113 | 147 | 9 | 7.8 | 16.3 | LOW |
| death | T20 | 84 | 95 | 5 | 6.8 | 19.0 | LOW |
| middle | ODI | 54 | 53 | 3 | 5.9 | 17.7 | LOW |
| powerplay | ODI | 48 | 61 | 0 | 7.6 | — | LOW |
| new_ball | TEST | 48 | 31 | 0 | 3.9 | — | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| SPIN | LIST_A | 21 | 110 | 170 | 10.0 | 64.7 | 5.3 | 56.5 | MEDIUM |
| PACE | LIST_A | 9 | 92 | 90 | 18.4 | 102.2 | 12.2 | 50.0 | LOW |
| SPIN | TEST | 1 | 4 | 38 | 4.0 | 10.5 | 0.0 | 92.1 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.