Imal Zuwak betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 36 | 657 | 619 | 18.8 | 106.1 | 11.8 | 41.4 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 5.0 | — | LOW |
Why we like it
Splits where Imal Zuwak scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Opposition: Finland (T20)LOW sample
74 runs off 63 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 117.5 vs 106.1 overall, average 18.5 vs 18.8 overall.
- Bowling type: UNKNOWN (T20)LOW sample
97 runs off 72 balls in 10 T20 matches — strike rate 134.7 vs 106.1 overall, average 32.3 vs 18.8 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Opposition: Indonesia (T20)MEDIUM sample
120 runs off 124 balls in 8 T20 matches — strike rate 96.8 vs 106.1 overall, average 15.0 vs 18.8 overall.
- Venue: Udayana Cricket Ground (T20)MEDIUM sample
120 runs off 124 balls in 8 T20 matches — strike rate 96.8 vs 106.1 overall, average 15.0 vs 18.8 overall.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)MEDIUM sample
238 runs off 244 balls in 26 T20 matches — strike rate 97.5 vs 106.1 overall, average 14.9 vs 18.8 overall.
- Opposition: Austria (T20)LOW sample
59 runs off 67 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 88.1 vs 106.1 overall, average 19.7 vs 18.8 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Indonesia | T20 | 8 | 120 | 124 | 15.0 | 96.8 | 8.9 | 44.4 | MEDIUM |
| Norway | T20 | 5 | 94 | 85 | 18.8 | 110.6 | 15.3 | 45.9 | LOW |
| Austria | T20 | 3 | 59 | 67 | 19.7 | 88.1 | 10.4 | 50.7 | LOW |
| Denmark | T20 | 2 | 73 | 67 | 73.0 | 109.0 | 11.9 | 41.8 | LOW |
| Finland | T20 | 4 | 74 | 63 | 18.5 | 117.5 | 11.1 | 41.3 | LOW |
| France | T20 | 2 | 62 | 58 | 31.0 | 106.9 | 12.1 | 36.2 | LOW |
| Portugal | T20 | 3 | 62 | 57 | 20.7 | 108.8 | 8.8 | 22.8 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Botkyrka Cricket Center, Stockholm | T20 | 9 | 199 | 189 | 22.1 | 105.3 | 12.2 | 39.2 | MEDIUM |
| Udayana Cricket Ground | T20 | 8 | 120 | 124 | 15.0 | 96.8 | 8.9 | 44.4 | MEDIUM |
| Ishoj Cricket Club, Vejledalen | T20 | 2 | 71 | 54 | 35.5 | 131.5 | 13.0 | 35.2 | LOW |
| Happy Valley Ground 2 | T20 | 4 | 42 | 51 | 10.5 | 82.4 | 5.9 | 41.2 | LOW |
| Stubberudmyra Cricket Ground, Oslo | T20 | 2 | 56 | 51 | 28.0 | 109.8 | 15.7 | 45.1 | LOW |
| Svanholm Park, Brondby | T20 | 1 | 47 | 46 | — | 102.2 | 8.7 | 41.3 | LOW |
| Bayer Uerdingen Cricket Ground | T20 | 4 | 59 | 35 | 14.8 | 168.6 | 28.6 | 37.1 | LOW |
| Tikkurila Cricket Ground | T20 | 3 | 29 | 33 | 9.7 | 87.9 | 9.1 | 45.5 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 36 | 657 | 619 | 18.8 | 106.1 | 11.8 | 41.4 | HIGH |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| powerplay | T20 | 32 | 346 | 344 | 21.6 | 100.6 | 12.5 | 47.4 | HIGH |
| middle | T20 | 20 | 279 | 249 | 19.9 | 112.0 | 10.4 | 32.9 | MEDIUM |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 35 | 322 | 303 | 20.1 | 106.3 | 13.5 | 44.2 | HIGH |
| SPIN | T20 | 26 | 238 | 244 | 14.9 | 97.5 | 8.2 | 40.2 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 10 | 97 | 72 | 32.3 | 134.7 | 16.7 | 33.3 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.