Irfan Hafejee betting stats, splits & projections
Bowler
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 20 | 303 | 355 | 17.8 | 85.4 | 9.9 | 53.5 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 384 | 411 | 18 | 6.4 | 22.8 | HIGH |
Why we like it
Splits where Irfan Hafejee scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Phase: middle (T20)MEDIUM sample
245 runs off 264 balls in 14 T20 matches — strike rate 92.8 vs 85.4 overall, average 27.2 vs 17.8 overall.
- Venue: Los Pinos Polo Club 1, Cundinamarca (T20)LOW sample
83 runs off 77 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 107.8 vs 85.4 overall, average 27.7 vs 17.8 overall.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)LOW sample
101 runs off 108 balls in 13 T20 matches — strike rate 93.5 vs 85.4 overall, average 16.8 vs 17.8 overall.
- Bowling type: UNKNOWN (T20)LOW sample
82 runs off 83 balls in 14 T20 matches — strike rate 98.8 vs 85.4 overall, average 13.7 vs 17.8 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)MEDIUM sample
120 runs off 164 balls in 12 T20 matches — strike rate 73.2 vs 85.4 overall, average 24.0 vs 17.8 overall.
- Venue: Hurlingham Club Ground, Buenos Aires (T20)LOW sample
51 runs off 76 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 67.1 vs 85.4 overall, average 10.2 vs 17.8 overall.
- Venue: Belgrano Athletic Club Ground, Buenos Aires (T20)LOW sample
58 runs off 75 balls in 2 T20 matches — strike rate 77.3 vs 85.4 overall, average 29.0 vs 17.8 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)LOW sample
26 runs off 62 balls in 8 T20 matches — strike rate 41.9 vs 85.4 overall, average 8.7 vs 17.8 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Brazil | T20 | 4 | 74 | 84 | 24.7 | 88.1 | 9.5 | 46.4 | LOW |
| Mexico | T20 | 2 | 48 | 49 | 24.0 | 98.0 | 12.2 | 53.1 | LOW |
| Bermuda | T20 | 3 | 30 | 48 | 15.0 | 62.5 | 6.3 | 58.3 | LOW |
| Cayman Islands | T20 | 2 | 18 | 47 | 9.0 | 38.3 | 2.1 | 72.3 | LOW |
| Bahamas | T20 | 3 | 46 | 38 | 15.3 | 121.1 | 15.8 | 44.7 | LOW |
| Suriname | T20 | 1 | 35 | 32 | — | 109.4 | 9.4 | 40.6 | LOW |
Bowling
| Brazil | T20 | 76 | 96 | 2 | 7.6 | 48.0 | LOW |
| Bahamas | T20 | 72 | 68 | 5 | 5.7 | 13.6 | LOW |
| Argentina | T20 | 48 | 45 | 3 | 5.6 | 15.0 | LOW |
| Cayman Islands | T20 | 48 | 53 | 5 | 6.6 | 10.6 | LOW |
| Mexico | T20 | 36 | 34 | 1 | 5.7 | 34.0 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Los Pinos Polo Club 1, Cundinamarca | T20 | 3 | 83 | 77 | 27.7 | 107.8 | 13.0 | 48.1 | LOW |
| Hurlingham Club Ground, Buenos Aires | T20 | 5 | 51 | 76 | 10.2 | 67.1 | 6.6 | 59.2 | LOW |
| Belgrano Athletic Club Ground, Buenos Aires | T20 | 2 | 58 | 75 | 29.0 | 77.3 | 9.3 | 50.7 | LOW |
| St Albans Club, Buenos Aires | T20 | 4 | 56 | 64 | 28.0 | 87.5 | 9.4 | 51.6 | LOW |
Bowling
| Hurlingham Club Ground, Buenos Aires | T20 | 108 | 109 | 9 | 6.1 | 12.1 | LOW |
| Los Pinos Polo Club 1, Cundinamarca | T20 | 66 | 76 | 2 | 6.9 | 38.0 | LOW |
| St Albans Club, Buenos Aires | T20 | 53 | 51 | 2 | 5.8 | 25.5 | LOW |
| Belgrano Athletic Club Ground, Buenos Aires | T20 | 46 | 65 | 1 | 8.5 | 65.0 | LOW |
| White Hill Field, Sandys Parish | T20 | 39 | 40 | 1 | 6.2 | 40.0 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 20 | 303 | 355 | 17.8 | 85.4 | 9.9 | 53.5 | HIGH |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 384 | 411 | 18 | 6.4 | 22.8 | HIGH |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 14 | 245 | 264 | 27.2 | 92.8 | 10.6 | 49.6 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 8 | 26 | 62 | 8.7 | 41.9 | 4.8 | 71.0 | LOW |
Bowling
| middle | T20 | 251 | 262 | 12 | 6.3 | 21.8 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 70 | 71 | 4 | 6.1 | 17.8 | LOW |
| powerplay | T20 | 63 | 78 | 2 | 7.4 | 39.0 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| SPIN | T20 | 12 | 120 | 164 | 24.0 | 73.2 | 8.5 | 59.8 | MEDIUM |
| PACE | T20 | 13 | 101 | 108 | 16.8 | 93.5 | 11.1 | 48.1 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 14 | 82 | 83 | 13.7 | 98.8 | 10.8 | 48.2 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.