Izaz Ali betting stats, splits & projections
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 15 | 235 | 184 | 15.7 | 127.7 | 17.4 | 44.6 | MEDIUM |
| overall | T20 | 257 | 394 | 16 | 9.2 | 24.6 | MEDIUM |
Why we like it
Splits where Izaz Ali scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Opposition: Austria (T20)LOW sample
102 runs off 71 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 143.7 vs 127.7 overall, average 25.5 vs 15.7 overall.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)LOW sample
94 runs off 63 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 149.2 vs 127.7 overall, average 31.3 vs 15.7 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
No split is materially below their own format baseline.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Austria | T20 | 4 | 102 | 71 | 25.5 | 143.7 | 22.5 | 46.5 | LOW |
| Sweden | T20 | 2 | 25 | 30 | 12.5 | 83.3 | 6.7 | 40.0 | LOW |
Bowling
| Austria | T20 | 90 | 106 | 10 | 7.1 | 10.6 | LOW |
| Hungary | T20 | 54 | 117 | 1 | 13.0 | 117.0 | LOW |
| Serbia | T20 | 36 | 54 | 1 | 9.0 | 54.0 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Happy Valley Ground | T20 | 2 | 101 | 59 | 50.5 | 171.2 | 28.8 | 40.7 | LOW |
Bowling
| GB Oval, Szodliget | T20 | 54 | 117 | 1 | 13.0 | 117.0 | LOW |
| Happy Valley Ground | T20 | 48 | 58 | 3 | 7.3 | 19.3 | LOW |
| Ballpark Ground, Graz | T20 | 42 | 60 | 5 | 8.6 | 12.0 | LOW |
| Lisicji Jarak Cricket Ground | T20 | 36 | 54 | 1 | 9.0 | 54.0 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 15 | 235 | 184 | 15.7 | 127.7 | 17.4 | 44.6 | MEDIUM |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 257 | 394 | 16 | 9.2 | 24.6 | MEDIUM |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 13 | 158 | 129 | 14.4 | 122.5 | 16.3 | 42.6 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 7 | 26 | 34 | 13.0 | 76.5 | 8.8 | 61.8 | LOW |
Bowling
| middle | T20 | 146 | 198 | 8 | 8.1 | 24.8 | LOW |
| powerplay | T20 | 87 | 153 | 5 | 10.6 | 30.6 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 13 | 115 | 89 | 14.4 | 129.2 | 19.1 | 44.9 | LOW |
| SPIN | T20 | 6 | 94 | 63 | 31.3 | 149.2 | 20.6 | 41.3 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 8 | 26 | 32 | 6.5 | 81.3 | 6.3 | 50.0 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.