J Butler betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 34 | 788 | 669 | 28.1 | 117.8 | 14.2 | 39.5 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 207 | 251 | 14 | 7.3 | 17.9 | MEDIUM |
Why we like it
Splits where J Butler scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)HIGH sample
411 runs off 361 balls in 28 T20 matches — strike rate 113.9 vs 117.8 overall, average 41.1 vs 28.1 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)HIGH sample
451 runs off 383 balls in 29 T20 matches — strike rate 117.8 vs 117.8 overall, average 37.6 vs 28.1 overall.
- Opposition: Germany (T20)MEDIUM sample
156 runs off 122 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 127.9 vs 117.8 overall, average 52.0 vs 28.1 overall.
- Venue: King George V Sports Ground, Castel (T20)MEDIUM sample
158 runs off 125 balls in 7 T20 matches — strike rate 126.4 vs 117.8 overall, average 31.6 vs 28.1 overall.
- Venue: Sportpark Het Schootsveld, Deventer (T20)MEDIUM sample
156 runs off 122 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 127.9 vs 117.8 overall, average 52.0 vs 28.1 overall.
- Venue: Happy Valley Ground 2 (T20)MEDIUM sample
161 runs off 121 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 133.1 vs 117.8 overall, average 53.7 vs 28.1 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Opposition: Spain (T20)LOW sample
61 runs off 67 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 91.0 vs 117.8 overall, average 12.2 vs 28.1 overall.
- Venue: Desert Springs Cricket Ground, Almeria (T20)LOW sample
93 runs off 95 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 97.9 vs 117.8 overall, average 23.3 vs 28.1 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Germany | T20 | 3 | 156 | 122 | 52.0 | 127.9 | 14.8 | 36.9 | MEDIUM |
| Jersey | T20 | 5 | 121 | 101 | 30.3 | 119.8 | 15.8 | 44.6 | LOW |
| Austria | T20 | 2 | 88 | 69 | 44.0 | 127.5 | 13.0 | 34.8 | LOW |
| Spain | T20 | 6 | 61 | 67 | 12.2 | 91.0 | 13.4 | 55.2 | LOW |
| Norway | T20 | 2 | 49 | 57 | 24.5 | 86.0 | 5.3 | 36.8 | LOW |
| Bulgaria | T20 | 2 | 59 | 39 | 59.0 | 151.3 | 17.9 | 33.3 | LOW |
| Malta | T20 | 2 | 44 | 38 | 44.0 | 115.8 | 13.2 | 34.2 | LOW |
| Sweden | T20 | 1 | 43 | 32 | 43.0 | 134.4 | 15.6 | 31.3 | LOW |
Bowling
| Spain | T20 | 39 | 53 | 4 | 8.2 | 13.3 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| King George V Sports Ground, Castel | T20 | 7 | 158 | 125 | 31.6 | 126.4 | 17.6 | 33.6 | MEDIUM |
| Sportpark Het Schootsveld, Deventer | T20 | 3 | 156 | 122 | 52.0 | 127.9 | 14.8 | 36.9 | MEDIUM |
| Happy Valley Ground 2 | T20 | 3 | 161 | 121 | 53.7 | 133.1 | 15.7 | 35.5 | MEDIUM |
| Desert Springs Cricket Ground, Almeria | T20 | 4 | 93 | 95 | 23.3 | 97.9 | 12.6 | 45.3 | LOW |
| Grainville, St Saviour | T20 | 3 | 63 | 50 | 31.5 | 126.0 | 18.0 | 46.0 | LOW |
| Guernsey Rovers Athletic Club Ground, Port Soif | T20 | 2 | 62 | 46 | 62.0 | 134.8 | 15.2 | 30.4 | LOW |
| Tikkurila Cricket Ground | T20 | 3 | 42 | 39 | 14.0 | 107.7 | 7.7 | 41.0 | LOW |
Bowling
| Kerava National Cricket Ground | T20 | 54 | 73 | 4 | 8.1 | 18.3 | LOW |
| Happy Valley Ground | T20 | 48 | 28 | 4 | 3.5 | 7.0 | LOW |
| La Manga Club Bottom Ground | T20 | 39 | 53 | 4 | 8.2 | 13.3 | LOW |
| King George V Sports Ground, Castel | T20 | 36 | 59 | 1 | 9.8 | 59.0 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 34 | 788 | 669 | 28.1 | 117.8 | 14.2 | 39.5 | HIGH |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 207 | 251 | 14 | 7.3 | 17.9 | MEDIUM |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| powerplay | T20 | 29 | 451 | 383 | 37.6 | 117.8 | 17.0 | 45.2 | HIGH |
| middle | T20 | 18 | 301 | 248 | 25.1 | 121.4 | 11.3 | 30.2 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 6 | 36 | 38 | 9.0 | 94.7 | 5.3 | 42.1 | LOW |
Bowling
| middle | T20 | 171 | 202 | 13 | 7.1 | 15.5 | MEDIUM |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 28 | 411 | 361 | 41.1 | 113.9 | 14.7 | 41.3 | HIGH |
| SPIN | T20 | 22 | 269 | 225 | 20.7 | 119.6 | 12.9 | 37.8 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 17 | 108 | 83 | 21.6 | 130.1 | 15.7 | 36.1 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.