J Byrappa betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 12 | 238 | 224 | 23.8 | 106.3 | 11.2 | 46.4 | MEDIUM |
| overall | T20 | 69 | 87 | 2 | 7.6 | 43.5 | LOW |
Why we like it
Splits where J Byrappa scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Venue: Los Pinos Polo Club 1, Cundinamarca (T20)LOW sample
120 runs off 104 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 115.4 vs 106.3 overall, average 40.0 vs 23.8 overall.
- Bowling type: UNKNOWN (T20)LOW sample
123 runs off 105 balls in 8 T20 matches — strike rate 117.1 vs 106.3 overall, average 41.0 vs 23.8 overall.
- Phase: middle (T20)LOW sample
135 runs off 105 balls in 8 T20 matches — strike rate 128.6 vs 106.3 overall, average 22.5 vs 23.8 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)LOW sample
92 runs off 99 balls in 8 T20 matches — strike rate 92.9 vs 106.3 overall, average 46.0 vs 23.8 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Argentina | T20 | 2 | 50 | 54 | 50.0 | 92.6 | 9.3 | 44.4 | LOW |
| Brazil | T20 | 2 | 58 | 50 | 29.0 | 116.0 | 14.0 | 52.0 | LOW |
| Peru | T20 | 1 | 62 | 48 | 62.0 | 129.2 | 18.8 | 47.9 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Los Pinos Polo Club 1, Cundinamarca | T20 | 3 | 120 | 104 | 40.0 | 115.4 | 14.4 | 49.0 | LOW |
| Jimmy Powell Oval, Cayman Islands | T20 | 6 | 98 | 98 | 19.6 | 100.0 | 8.2 | 41.8 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 12 | 238 | 224 | 23.8 | 106.3 | 11.2 | 46.4 | MEDIUM |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 69 | 87 | 2 | 7.6 | 43.5 | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 8 | 135 | 105 | 22.5 | 128.6 | 17.1 | 44.8 | LOW |
| powerplay | T20 | 8 | 92 | 99 | 46.0 | 92.9 | 7.1 | 49.5 | LOW |
Bowling
| middle | T20 | 39 | 62 | 0 | 9.5 | — | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 8 | 123 | 105 | 41.0 | 117.1 | 13.3 | 47.6 | LOW |
| SPIN | T20 | 8 | 71 | 68 | 17.8 | 104.4 | 8.8 | 42.6 | LOW |
| PACE | T20 | 8 | 44 | 51 | 14.7 | 86.3 | 9.8 | 49.0 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.