J Gunasekar betting stats, splits & projections
All-rounder
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 27 | 922 | 829 | 46.1 | 111.2 | 11.1 | 36.4 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 516 | 403 | 24 | 4.7 | 16.8 | HIGH |
Why we like it
Splits where J Gunasekar scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Venue: Al Amerat Cricket Ground Oman Cricket (Ministry Turf 1) (T20)HIGH sample
343 runs off 304 balls in 9 T20 matches — strike rate 112.8 vs 111.2 overall, average 57.2 vs 46.1 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)HIGH sample
519 runs off 451 balls in 26 T20 matches — strike rate 115.1 vs 111.2 overall, average 103.8 vs 46.1 overall.
- Opposition: Denmark (T20)LOW sample
174 runs off 119 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 146.2 vs 111.2 overall, average 87.0 vs 46.1 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)HIGH sample
409 runs off 345 balls in 26 T20 matches — strike rate 118.6 vs 111.2 overall, average 37.2 vs 46.1 overall.
- Phase: middle (T20)HIGH sample
367 runs off 347 balls in 20 T20 matches — strike rate 105.8 vs 111.2 overall, average 30.6 vs 46.1 overall.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)MEDIUM sample
214 runs off 229 balls in 19 T20 matches — strike rate 93.4 vs 111.2 overall, average 35.7 vs 46.1 overall.
- Venue: Selangor Turf Club, Kuala Lumpur (T20)LOW sample
78 runs off 80 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 97.5 vs 111.2 overall, average 39.0 vs 46.1 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Qatar | T20 | 8 | 337 | 321 | 48.1 | 105.0 | 9.7 | 35.2 | HIGH |
| Bahrain | T20 | 7 | 212 | 198 | 53.0 | 107.1 | 11.1 | 39.9 | MEDIUM |
| Denmark | T20 | 3 | 174 | 119 | 87.0 | 146.2 | 16.0 | 22.7 | LOW |
| Saudi Arabia | T20 | 2 | 97 | 55 | 97.0 | 176.4 | 20.0 | 18.2 | LOW |
| United Arab Emirates | T20 | 3 | 22 | 52 | 7.3 | 42.3 | 1.9 | 65.4 | LOW |
| Kuwait | T20 | 1 | 41 | 41 | — | 100.0 | 7.3 | 39.0 | LOW |
| Philippines | T20 | 1 | 37 | 38 | 37.0 | 97.4 | 13.2 | 50.0 | LOW |
Bowling
| Qatar | T20 | 162 | 163 | 7 | 6.0 | 23.3 | MEDIUM |
| Bahrain | T20 | 144 | 91 | 6 | 3.8 | 15.2 | LOW |
| Denmark | T20 | 42 | 39 | 3 | 5.6 | 13.0 | LOW |
| Saudi Arabia | T20 | 42 | 8 | 4 | 1.1 | 2.0 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Al Amerat Cricket Ground Oman Cricket (Ministry Turf 1) | T20 | 9 | 343 | 304 | 57.2 | 112.8 | 11.2 | 35.2 | HIGH |
| Al Amerat Cricket Ground Oman Cricket (Ministry Turf 2) | T20 | 6 | 230 | 211 | 46.0 | 109.0 | 11.8 | 40.8 | MEDIUM |
| West End Park International Cricket Stadium, Doha | T20 | 5 | 201 | 178 | 50.3 | 112.9 | 10.1 | 31.5 | MEDIUM |
| Selangor Turf Club, Kuala Lumpur | T20 | 3 | 78 | 80 | 39.0 | 97.5 | 7.5 | 35.0 | LOW |
| YSD-UKM Cricket Oval, Bangi | T20 | 4 | 70 | 56 | 23.3 | 125.0 | 16.1 | 44.6 | LOW |
Bowling
| Al Amerat Cricket Ground Oman Cricket (Ministry Turf 1) | T20 | 174 | 136 | 8 | 4.7 | 17.0 | MEDIUM |
| Al Amerat Cricket Ground Oman Cricket (Ministry Turf 2) | T20 | 120 | 100 | 6 | 5.0 | 16.7 | LOW |
| YSD-UKM Cricket Oval, Bangi | T20 | 96 | 57 | 5 | 3.6 | 11.4 | LOW |
| West End Park International Cricket Stadium, Doha | T20 | 90 | 93 | 4 | 6.2 | 23.3 | LOW |
| Selangor Turf Club, Kuala Lumpur | T20 | 36 | 17 | 1 | 2.8 | 17.0 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 27 | 922 | 829 | 46.1 | 111.2 | 11.1 | 36.4 | HIGH |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 516 | 403 | 24 | 4.7 | 16.8 | HIGH |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| powerplay | T20 | 26 | 519 | 451 | 103.8 | 115.1 | 13.7 | 39.5 | HIGH |
| middle | T20 | 20 | 367 | 347 | 30.6 | 105.8 | 7.8 | 33.4 | HIGH |
| death | T20 | 4 | 36 | 31 | 12.0 | 116.1 | 9.7 | 25.8 | LOW |
Bowling
| middle | T20 | 324 | 224 | 15 | 4.1 | 14.9 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 150 | 123 | 9 | 4.9 | 13.7 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 42 | 56 | 0 | 8.0 | — | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 26 | 409 | 345 | 37.2 | 118.6 | 14.2 | 39.4 | HIGH |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 19 | 299 | 255 | 99.7 | 117.3 | 11.4 | 31.4 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | T20 | 19 | 214 | 229 | 35.7 | 93.4 | 6.1 | 37.6 | MEDIUM |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.