J Mosca betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 23 | 483 | 339 | 28.4 | 142.5 | 20.6 | 37.8 | HIGH |
Why we like it
Splits where J Mosca scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Venue: Simar Cricket Ground, Rome (T20)LOW sample
125 runs off 64 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 195.3 vs 142.5 overall, average 125.0 vs 28.4 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)MEDIUM sample
161 runs off 120 balls in 17 T20 matches — strike rate 134.2 vs 142.5 overall, average 26.8 vs 28.4 overall.
- Phase: middle (T20)LOW sample
130 runs off 98 balls in 7 T20 matches — strike rate 132.7 vs 142.5 overall, average 43.3 vs 28.4 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Nepal | T20 | 1 | 60 | 44 | — | 136.4 | 18.2 | 38.6 | LOW |
| Guernsey | T20 | 1 | 66 | 37 | — | 178.4 | 24.3 | 27.0 | LOW |
| Jersey | T20 | 1 | 49 | 35 | 49.0 | 140.0 | 22.9 | 42.9 | LOW |
| England | T20 | 1 | 43 | 34 | 43.0 | 126.5 | 20.6 | 38.2 | LOW |
| Turkey | T20 | 1 | 51 | 32 | — | 159.4 | 15.6 | 12.5 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Simar Cricket Ground, Rome | T20 | 3 | 125 | 64 | 125.0 | 195.3 | 28.1 | 17.2 | LOW |
| Sportpark Westvliet, Voorburg | T20 | 3 | 80 | 53 | 40.0 | 150.9 | 18.9 | 34.0 | LOW |
| Wankhede Stadium, Mumbai | T20 | 1 | 60 | 44 | — | 136.4 | 18.2 | 38.6 | LOW |
| Eden Gardens, Kolkata | T20 | 3 | 45 | 40 | 15.0 | 112.5 | 17.5 | 42.5 | LOW |
| Goldenacre, Edinburgh | T20 | 2 | 51 | 40 | 51.0 | 127.5 | 20.0 | 45.0 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 23 | 483 | 339 | 28.4 | 142.5 | 20.6 | 37.8 | HIGH |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| powerplay | T20 | 23 | 353 | 241 | 25.2 | 146.5 | 24.5 | 43.6 | MEDIUM |
| middle | T20 | 7 | 130 | 98 | 43.3 | 132.7 | 11.2 | 23.5 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 20 | 258 | 180 | 25.8 | 143.3 | 23.3 | 43.9 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | T20 | 17 | 161 | 120 | 26.8 | 134.2 | 17.5 | 34.2 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 6 | 64 | 39 | 64.0 | 164.1 | 17.9 | 20.5 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.