J Rasu betting stats, splits & projections
Bowler
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 27 | 400 | 388 | 16.7 | 103.1 | 10.1 | 41.0 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 565 | 706 | 39 | 7.5 | 18.1 | HIGH |
Why we like it
Splits where J Rasu scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)MEDIUM sample
160 runs off 144 balls in 22 T20 matches — strike rate 111.1 vs 103.1 overall, average 13.3 vs 16.7 overall.
- Phase: middle (T20)MEDIUM sample
221 runs off 198 balls in 16 T20 matches — strike rate 111.6 vs 103.1 overall, average 17.0 vs 16.7 overall.
- Opposition: Fiji (T20)LOW sample
131 runs off 98 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 133.7 vs 103.1 overall, average 32.8 vs 16.7 overall.
- Venue: Faleata Oval No 2, Apia (T20)LOW sample
101 runs off 83 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 121.7 vs 103.1 overall, average 16.8 vs 16.7 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)MEDIUM sample
127 runs off 140 balls in 13 T20 matches — strike rate 90.7 vs 103.1 overall, average 21.2 vs 16.7 overall.
- Venue: Bayuemas Oval, Kuala Lumpur (T20)LOW sample
82 runs off 93 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 88.2 vs 103.1 overall, average 20.5 vs 16.7 overall.
- Venue: Sano International Cricket Ground (T20)LOW sample
80 runs off 90 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 88.9 vs 103.1 overall, average 20.0 vs 16.7 overall.
- Bowling type: UNKNOWN (T20)LOW sample
56 runs off 67 balls in 10 T20 matches — strike rate 83.6 vs 103.1 overall, average 18.7 vs 16.7 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Fiji | T20 | 4 | 131 | 98 | 32.8 | 133.7 | 15.3 | 30.6 | LOW |
| Samoa | T20 | 4 | 68 | 57 | 22.7 | 119.3 | 12.3 | 36.8 | LOW |
| Cook Islands | T20 | 5 | 54 | 53 | 13.5 | 101.9 | 11.3 | 50.9 | LOW |
| Kuwait | T20 | 2 | 48 | 49 | 48.0 | 98.0 | 8.2 | 40.8 | LOW |
| Indonesia | T20 | 1 | 27 | 35 | 27.0 | 77.1 | 5.7 | 45.7 | LOW |
Bowling
| Cook Islands | T20 | 102 | 160 | 6 | 9.4 | 26.7 | LOW |
| Samoa | T20 | 102 | 112 | 7 | 6.6 | 16.0 | LOW |
| Japan | T20 | 72 | 69 | 7 | 5.8 | 9.9 | LOW |
| Fiji | T20 | 66 | 78 | 4 | 7.1 | 19.5 | LOW |
| Papua New Guinea | T20 | 48 | 74 | 2 | 9.3 | 37.0 | LOW |
| Philippines | T20 | 48 | 36 | 2 | 4.5 | 18.0 | LOW |
| Kuwait | T20 | 37 | 52 | 3 | 8.4 | 17.3 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Bayuemas Oval, Kuala Lumpur | T20 | 5 | 82 | 93 | 20.5 | 88.2 | 6.5 | 39.8 | LOW |
| Sano International Cricket Ground | T20 | 4 | 80 | 90 | 20.0 | 88.9 | 8.9 | 50.0 | LOW |
| Faleata Oval No 2, Apia | T20 | 6 | 101 | 83 | 16.8 | 121.7 | 13.3 | 37.3 | LOW |
| Korogi Sports Park, Nisshin | T20 | 2 | 63 | 62 | 31.5 | 101.6 | 9.7 | 45.2 | LOW |
| Amini Park, Port Moresby | T20 | 6 | 30 | 30 | 5.0 | 100.0 | 10.0 | 50.0 | LOW |
| Independence Park, Port Vila | T20 | 4 | 44 | 30 | 22.0 | 146.7 | 16.7 | 10.0 | LOW |
Bowling
| Amini Park, Port Moresby | T20 | 120 | 116 | 5 | 5.8 | 23.2 | LOW |
| Faleata Oval No 2, Apia | T20 | 114 | 156 | 6 | 8.2 | 26.0 | LOW |
| Bayuemas Oval, Kuala Lumpur | T20 | 103 | 145 | 7 | 8.4 | 20.7 | LOW |
| Independence Park, Port Vila | T20 | 102 | 128 | 6 | 7.5 | 21.3 | LOW |
| Sano International Cricket Ground | T20 | 90 | 127 | 9 | 8.5 | 14.1 | LOW |
| Korogi Sports Park, Nisshin | T20 | 36 | 34 | 6 | 5.7 | 5.7 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 23 | 320 | 298 | 16.0 | 107.4 | 10.4 | 38.3 | MEDIUM |
| Japan | T20 | 4 | 80 | 90 | 20.0 | 88.9 | 8.9 | 50.0 | LOW |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 475 | 579 | 30 | 7.3 | 19.3 | HIGH |
| Japan | T20 | 90 | 127 | 9 | 8.5 | 14.1 | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 16 | 221 | 198 | 17.0 | 111.6 | 9.6 | 34.3 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 13 | 127 | 140 | 21.2 | 90.7 | 10.0 | 50.7 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 8 | 52 | 50 | 10.4 | 104.0 | 12.0 | 40.0 | LOW |
Bowling
| powerplay | T20 | 246 | 316 | 11 | 7.7 | 28.7 | MEDIUM |
| middle | T20 | 235 | 277 | 13 | 7.1 | 21.3 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 84 | 113 | 15 | 8.1 | 7.5 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 23 | 184 | 177 | 20.4 | 104.0 | 10.2 | 40.1 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | T20 | 22 | 160 | 144 | 13.3 | 111.1 | 11.1 | 39.6 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 10 | 56 | 67 | 18.7 | 83.6 | 7.5 | 46.3 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.