J Tugsjargal betting stats, splits & projections
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 9 | 55 | 146 | 6.9 | 37.7 | 2.1 | 72.6 | MEDIUM |
| overall | T20 | 42 | 59 | 2 | 8.4 | 29.5 | LOW |
Why we like it
Splits where J Tugsjargal scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Phase: middle (T20)LOW sample
33 runs off 71 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 46.5 vs 37.7 overall, average 11.0 vs 6.9 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)LOW sample
24 runs off 96 balls in 8 T20 matches — strike rate 25.0 vs 37.7 overall, average 4.8 vs 6.9 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)LOW sample
17 runs off 69 balls in 7 T20 matches — strike rate 24.6 vs 37.7 overall, average 4.3 vs 6.9 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Philippines | T20 | 2 | 19 | 54 | 9.5 | 35.2 | 1.9 | 72.2 | LOW |
| Myanmar | T20 | 2 | 18 | 40 | 18.0 | 45.0 | 0.0 | 67.5 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Sano International Cricket Ground 2 | T20 | 1 | 19 | 46 | 19.0 | 41.3 | 2.2 | 69.6 | LOW |
| Sano International Cricket Ground | T20 | 3 | 6 | 36 | 2.0 | 16.7 | 0.0 | 83.3 | LOW |
| YSD-UKM Cricket Oval, Bangi | T20 | 1 | 14 | 32 | — | 43.8 | 0.0 | 68.8 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 6 | 49 | 110 | 9.8 | 44.5 | 2.7 | 69.1 | LOW |
| Japan | T20 | 3 | 6 | 36 | 2.0 | 16.7 | 0.0 | 83.3 | LOW |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 36 | 50 | 2 | 8.3 | 25.0 | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 5 | 33 | 71 | 11.0 | 46.5 | 2.8 | 67.6 | LOW |
| powerplay | T20 | 7 | 17 | 69 | 4.3 | 24.6 | 1.4 | 81.2 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 8 | 24 | 96 | 4.8 | 25.0 | 1.0 | 78.1 | LOW |
| SPIN | T20 | 4 | 23 | 36 | 11.5 | 63.9 | 2.8 | 58.3 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.