JA Diergaardt betting stats, splits & projections
All-rounder
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 70 | 718 | 910 | 13.1 | 78.9 | 8.1 | 55.2 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 1085 | 1073 | 47 | 5.9 | 22.8 | HIGH |
Why we like it
Splits where JA Diergaardt scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Opposition: Uganda (T20)MEDIUM sample
230 runs off 237 balls in 19 T20 matches — strike rate 97.0 vs 78.9 overall, average 16.4 vs 13.1 overall.
- Venue: Centre for Cricket Development Ground, Windhoek (T20)MEDIUM sample
141 runs off 177 balls in 7 T20 matches — strike rate 79.7 vs 78.9 overall, average 28.2 vs 13.1 overall.
- Venue: Entebbe Cricket Oval (T20)MEDIUM sample
111 runs off 120 balls in 10 T20 matches — strike rate 92.5 vs 78.9 overall, average 22.2 vs 13.1 overall.
- Phase: death (T20)MEDIUM sample
182 runs off 167 balls in 22 T20 matches — strike rate 109.0 vs 78.9 overall, average 15.2 vs 13.1 overall.
- Venue: High Performance Oval, Windhoek (T20)LOW sample
75 runs off 77 balls in 7 T20 matches — strike rate 97.4 vs 78.9 overall, average 15.0 vs 13.1 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)HIGH sample
213 runs off 317 balls in 31 T20 matches — strike rate 67.2 vs 78.9 overall, average 15.2 vs 13.1 overall.
- Opposition: Zimbabwe (T20)MEDIUM sample
113 runs off 164 balls in 9 T20 matches — strike rate 68.9 vs 78.9 overall, average 16.1 vs 13.1 overall.
- Opposition: Netherlands (T20)LOW sample
54 runs off 80 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 67.5 vs 78.9 overall, average 10.8 vs 13.1 overall.
- Opposition: Hong Kong (T20)LOW sample
50 runs off 71 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 70.4 vs 78.9 overall, average 16.7 vs 13.1 overall.
- Venue: Dubai International Cricket Stadium (T20)LOW sample
65 runs off 95 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 68.4 vs 78.9 overall, average 16.3 vs 13.1 overall.
- Bowling type: UNKNOWN (T20)LOW sample
40 runs off 68 balls in 11 T20 matches — strike rate 58.8 vs 78.9 overall, average 10.0 vs 13.1 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Uganda | T20 | 19 | 230 | 237 | 16.4 | 97.0 | 11.0 | 46.8 | MEDIUM |
| Zimbabwe | T20 | 9 | 113 | 164 | 16.1 | 68.9 | 6.1 | 58.5 | MEDIUM |
| United Arab Emirates | T20 | 12 | 117 | 156 | 10.6 | 75.0 | 7.7 | 57.7 | MEDIUM |
| Netherlands | T20 | 5 | 54 | 80 | 10.8 | 67.5 | 5.0 | 53.8 | LOW |
| Hong Kong | T20 | 4 | 50 | 71 | 16.7 | 70.4 | 9.9 | 64.8 | LOW |
| Papua New Guinea | T20 | 3 | 41 | 49 | 13.7 | 83.7 | 12.2 | 57.1 | LOW |
Bowling
| Uganda | T20 | 269 | 316 | 12 | 7.0 | 26.3 | MEDIUM |
| United Arab Emirates | T20 | 210 | 186 | 10 | 5.3 | 18.6 | MEDIUM |
| Zimbabwe | T20 | 103 | 115 | 6 | 6.7 | 19.2 | LOW |
| Hong Kong | T20 | 84 | 73 | 5 | 5.2 | 14.6 | LOW |
| Tanzania | T20 | 78 | 52 | 5 | 4.0 | 10.4 | LOW |
| Thailand | T20 | 72 | 53 | 2 | 4.4 | 26.5 | LOW |
| Papua New Guinea | T20 | 49 | 42 | 2 | 5.1 | 21.0 | LOW |
| Malaysia | T20 | 42 | 32 | 2 | 4.6 | 16.0 | LOW |
| Nepal | T20 | 36 | 36 | 1 | 6.0 | 36.0 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Centre for Cricket Development Ground, Windhoek | T20 | 7 | 141 | 177 | 28.2 | 79.7 | 7.3 | 54.8 | MEDIUM |
| Entebbe Cricket Oval | T20 | 10 | 111 | 120 | 22.2 | 92.5 | 10.0 | 52.5 | MEDIUM |
| Dubai International Cricket Stadium | T20 | 5 | 65 | 95 | 16.3 | 68.4 | 6.3 | 60.0 | LOW |
| High Performance Oval, Windhoek | T20 | 7 | 75 | 77 | 15.0 | 97.4 | 9.1 | 41.6 | LOW |
| United Cricket Club Ground, Windhoek | T20 | 6 | 47 | 65 | 9.4 | 72.3 | 9.2 | 60.0 | LOW |
| Sportpark Westvliet, Voorburg | T20 | 3 | 46 | 63 | 15.3 | 73.0 | 4.8 | 49.2 | LOW |
| Namibia Cricket Ground, Windhoek | T20 | 4 | 66 | 57 | 22.0 | 115.8 | 17.5 | 42.1 | LOW |
| Wanderers Cricket Ground, Windhoek | T20 | 5 | 39 | 53 | 7.8 | 73.6 | 5.7 | 54.7 | LOW |
| Mulpani Cricket Ground | T20 | 2 | 47 | 51 | 47.0 | 92.2 | 11.8 | 51.0 | LOW |
| Mission Road Ground, Mong Kok, Hong Kong | T20 | 3 | 20 | 39 | 6.7 | 51.3 | 5.1 | 69.2 | LOW |
| Asian Institute of Technology Ground, Bangkok | T20 | 5 | 29 | 32 | 7.3 | 90.6 | 12.5 | 56.3 | LOW |
Bowling
| High Performance Oval, Windhoek | T20 | 186 | 192 | 8 | 6.2 | 24.0 | MEDIUM |
| Entebbe Cricket Oval | T20 | 133 | 145 | 6 | 6.5 | 24.2 | LOW |
| Namibia Cricket Ground, Windhoek | T20 | 126 | 155 | 3 | 7.4 | 51.7 | LOW |
| Dubai International Cricket Stadium | T20 | 120 | 92 | 5 | 4.6 | 18.4 | LOW |
| Wanderers Cricket Ground, Windhoek | T20 | 102 | 93 | 9 | 5.5 | 10.3 | LOW |
| Mission Road Ground, Mong Kok, Hong Kong | T20 | 72 | 33 | 3 | 2.8 | 11.0 | LOW |
| Terdthai Cricket Ground, Bangkok | T20 | 69 | 83 | 2 | 7.2 | 41.5 | LOW |
| United Cricket Club Ground, Windhoek | T20 | 65 | 46 | 3 | 4.2 | 15.3 | LOW |
| Asian Institute of Technology Ground, Bangkok | T20 | 54 | 61 | 2 | 6.8 | 30.5 | LOW |
| Mulpani Cricket Ground | T20 | 42 | 42 | 1 | 6.0 | 42.0 | LOW |
| Selangor Turf Club, Kuala Lumpur | T20 | 42 | 32 | 2 | 4.6 | 16.0 | LOW |
| Tribhuvan University International Cricket Ground, Kirtipur | T20 | 38 | 63 | 1 | 9.9 | 63.0 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 70 | 718 | 910 | 13.1 | 78.9 | 8.1 | 55.2 | HIGH |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 1085 | 1073 | 47 | 5.9 | 22.8 | HIGH |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 47 | 323 | 426 | 11.1 | 75.8 | 6.1 | 51.6 | HIGH |
| powerplay | T20 | 31 | 213 | 317 | 15.2 | 67.2 | 9.8 | 68.5 | HIGH |
| death | T20 | 22 | 182 | 167 | 15.2 | 109.0 | 10.2 | 38.9 | MEDIUM |
Bowling
| middle | T20 | 563 | 500 | 21 | 5.3 | 23.8 | HIGH |
| death | T20 | 468 | 532 | 24 | 6.8 | 22.2 | HIGH |
| powerplay | T20 | 54 | 41 | 2 | 4.6 | 20.5 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| SPIN | T20 | 56 | 403 | 521 | 12.6 | 77.4 | 6.5 | 52.2 | HIGH |
| PACE | T20 | 41 | 275 | 321 | 14.5 | 85.7 | 11.5 | 58.9 | HIGH |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 11 | 40 | 68 | 10.0 | 58.8 | 4.4 | 60.3 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.