Jaspal Singh betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 43 | 721 | 623 | 23.3 | 115.7 | 14.4 | 44.6 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 193 | 256 | 6 | 8.0 | 42.7 | MEDIUM |
Why we like it
Splits where Jaspal Singh scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Venue: Marsa Sports Club (T20)MEDIUM sample
373 runs off 285 balls in 19 T20 matches — strike rate 130.9 vs 115.7 overall, average 28.7 vs 23.3 overall.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)MEDIUM sample
255 runs off 201 balls in 26 T20 matches — strike rate 126.9 vs 115.7 overall, average 18.2 vs 23.3 overall.
- Bowling type: UNKNOWN (T20)MEDIUM sample
197 runs off 155 balls in 21 T20 matches — strike rate 127.1 vs 115.7 overall, average 49.3 vs 23.3 overall.
- Phase: death (T20)MEDIUM sample
256 runs off 154 balls in 18 T20 matches — strike rate 166.2 vs 115.7 overall, average 23.3 vs 23.3 overall.
- Opposition: Gibraltar (T20)LOW sample
170 runs off 109 balls in 7 T20 matches — strike rate 156.0 vs 115.7 overall, average 34.0 vs 23.3 overall.
- Opposition: Switzerland (T20)LOW sample
88 runs off 64 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 137.5 vs 115.7 overall, average 29.3 vs 23.3 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)MEDIUM sample
269 runs off 267 balls in 32 T20 matches — strike rate 100.7 vs 115.7 overall, average 20.7 vs 23.3 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)MEDIUM sample
80 runs off 130 balls in 20 T20 matches — strike rate 61.5 vs 115.7 overall, average 26.7 vs 23.3 overall.
- Opposition: France (T20)LOW sample
51 runs off 66 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 77.3 vs 115.7 overall, average 12.8 vs 23.3 overall.
- Venue: Moara Vlasiei Cricket Ground, Ilfov County (T20)LOW sample
60 runs off 65 balls in 7 T20 matches — strike rate 92.3 vs 115.7 overall, average 12.0 vs 23.3 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Gibraltar | T20 | 7 | 170 | 109 | 34.0 | 156.0 | 22.0 | 40.4 | LOW |
| France | T20 | 6 | 51 | 66 | 12.8 | 77.3 | 10.6 | 65.2 | LOW |
| Switzerland | T20 | 3 | 88 | 64 | 29.3 | 137.5 | 20.3 | 46.9 | LOW |
| Estonia | T20 | 4 | 70 | 58 | 23.3 | 120.7 | 15.5 | 37.9 | LOW |
| Portugal | T20 | 2 | 67 | 56 | 67.0 | 119.6 | 16.1 | 37.5 | LOW |
| Romania | T20 | 5 | 53 | 55 | 13.3 | 96.4 | 10.9 | 47.3 | LOW |
| Guernsey | T20 | 2 | 22 | 34 | 11.0 | 64.7 | 5.9 | 55.9 | LOW |
| Finland | T20 | 1 | 46 | 32 | 46.0 | 143.8 | 15.6 | 34.4 | LOW |
| Sweden | T20 | 1 | 36 | 31 | — | 116.1 | 12.9 | 29.0 | LOW |
Bowling
| Estonia | T20 | 42 | 59 | 2 | 8.4 | 29.5 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Marsa Sports Club | T20 | 19 | 373 | 285 | 28.7 | 130.9 | 17.9 | 46.0 | MEDIUM |
| Europa Sports Complex | T20 | 4 | 74 | 66 | 24.7 | 112.1 | 15.2 | 42.4 | LOW |
| Moara Vlasiei Cricket Ground, Ilfov County | T20 | 7 | 60 | 65 | 12.0 | 92.3 | 10.8 | 49.2 | LOW |
| Guernsey Rovers Athletic Club Ground, Port Soif | T20 | 3 | 67 | 61 | 33.5 | 109.8 | 11.5 | 45.9 | LOW |
| Happy Valley Ground | T20 | 3 | 43 | 52 | 21.5 | 82.7 | 7.7 | 46.2 | LOW |
| King George V Sports Ground, Castel | T20 | 2 | 66 | 43 | 66.0 | 153.5 | 20.9 | 23.3 | LOW |
| Dreux Sport Cricket Club | T20 | 4 | 32 | 41 | 8.0 | 78.0 | 4.9 | 46.3 | LOW |
Bowling
| Marsa Sports Club | T20 | 73 | 115 | 3 | 9.5 | 38.3 | LOW |
| Guernsey Rovers Athletic Club Ground, Port Soif | T20 | 66 | 81 | 2 | 7.4 | 40.5 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 43 | 721 | 623 | 23.3 | 115.7 | 14.4 | 44.6 | HIGH |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 193 | 256 | 6 | 8.0 | 42.7 | MEDIUM |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 33 | 385 | 339 | 22.6 | 113.6 | 13.6 | 44.8 | HIGH |
| death | T20 | 18 | 256 | 154 | 23.3 | 166.2 | 22.1 | 27.3 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 20 | 80 | 130 | 26.7 | 61.5 | 7.7 | 64.6 | MEDIUM |
Bowling
| middle | T20 | 121 | 157 | 3 | 7.8 | 52.3 | LOW |
| powerplay | T20 | 60 | 89 | 2 | 8.9 | 44.5 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 32 | 269 | 267 | 20.7 | 100.7 | 12.0 | 45.3 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | T20 | 26 | 255 | 201 | 18.2 | 126.9 | 16.4 | 44.3 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 21 | 197 | 155 | 49.3 | 127.1 | 16.1 | 43.9 | MEDIUM |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.