JM Joao betting stats, splits & projections
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 10 | 96 | 101 | 10.7 | 95.0 | 12.9 | 49.5 | LOW |
| overall | T20 | 24 | 41 | 0 | 10.3 | — | LOW |
Current projections
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Eswatini | T20 | 6 | 77 | 71 | 12.8 | 108.5 | 15.5 | 46.5 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Malkerns Country Club oval | T20 | 7 | 78 | 73 | 13.0 | 106.8 | 15.1 | 46.6 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 10 | 96 | 101 | 10.7 | 95.0 | 12.9 | 49.5 | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| powerplay | T20 | 5 | 49 | 50 | 49.0 | 98.0 | 14.0 | 50.0 | LOW |
| middle | T20 | 7 | 40 | 40 | 6.7 | 100.0 | 12.5 | 42.5 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 9 | 71 | 68 | 10.1 | 104.4 | 16.2 | 50.0 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.