JM Kerr betting stats, splits & projections
All-rounder
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 71 | 977 | 791 | 20.4 | 123.5 | 14.8 | 32.6 | HIGH |
| overall | ODI | 28 | 276 | 260 | 13.1 | 106.2 | 13.1 | 44.2 | MEDIUM |
| overall | T20 | 2297 | 2330 | 110 | 6.1 | 21.2 | HIGH |
| overall | ODI | 1742 | 1206 | 50 | 4.2 | 24.1 | HIGH |
Why we like it
Splits where JM Kerr scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Phase: death (T20)HIGH sample
463 runs off 322 balls in 51 T20 matches — strike rate 143.8 vs 123.5 overall, average 16.5 vs 20.4 overall.
- Opposition: Northern Districts (T20)MEDIUM sample
212 runs off 152 balls in 10 T20 matches — strike rate 139.5 vs 123.5 overall, average 30.3 vs 20.4 overall.
- Phase: death (ODI)MEDIUM sample
192 runs off 168 balls in 21 ODI matches — strike rate 114.3 vs 106.2 overall, average 11.3 vs 13.1 overall.
- Venue: Hagley Oval, Christchurch (T20)LOW sample
90 runs off 64 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 140.6 vs 123.5 overall, average 22.5 vs 20.4 overall.
- Bowling type: UNKNOWN (T20)LOW sample
102 runs off 73 balls in 17 T20 matches — strike rate 139.7 vs 123.5 overall, average 25.5 vs 20.4 overall.
- Bowling type: PACE (ODI)LOW sample
108 runs off 72 balls in 16 ODI matches — strike rate 150.0 vs 106.2 overall, average 15.4 vs 13.1 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Phase: middle (T20)HIGH sample
479 runs off 424 balls in 34 T20 matches — strike rate 113.0 vs 123.5 overall, average 26.6 vs 20.4 overall.
- Bowling type: SPIN (ODI)MEDIUM sample
139 runs off 165 balls in 24 ODI matches — strike rate 84.2 vs 106.2 overall, average 11.6 vs 13.1 overall.
- Opposition: Auckland (T20)LOW sample
132 runs off 119 balls in 9 T20 matches — strike rate 110.9 vs 123.5 overall, average 26.4 vs 20.4 overall.
- Opposition: England (T20)LOW sample
100 runs off 91 balls in 10 T20 matches — strike rate 109.9 vs 123.5 overall, average 14.3 vs 20.4 overall.
- Phase: middle (ODI)LOW sample
84 runs off 92 balls in 12 ODI matches — strike rate 91.3 vs 106.2 overall, average 21.0 vs 13.1 overall.
Current projections
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Northern Districts | T20 | 10 | 212 | 152 | 30.3 | 139.5 | 17.8 | 30.3 | MEDIUM |
| Otago | T20 | 11 | 183 | 145 | 20.3 | 126.2 | 13.8 | 31.0 | MEDIUM |
| Auckland | T20 | 9 | 132 | 119 | 26.4 | 110.9 | 14.3 | 40.3 | LOW |
| Central Districts | T20 | 8 | 130 | 104 | 21.7 | 125.0 | 14.4 | 30.8 | LOW |
| Canterbury | T20 | 8 | 118 | 92 | 16.9 | 128.3 | 18.5 | 32.6 | LOW |
| England | T20 | 10 | 100 | 91 | 14.3 | 109.9 | 13.2 | 35.2 | LOW |
| England | ODI | 9 | 88 | 89 | 12.6 | 98.9 | 14.6 | 48.3 | LOW |
| Sri Lanka | ODI | 2 | 44 | 47 | 22.0 | 93.6 | 6.4 | 42.6 | LOW |
| West Indies | ODI | 2 | 32 | 39 | 16.0 | 82.1 | 7.7 | 53.8 | LOW |
Bowling
| England | ODI | 555 | 403 | 15 | 4.4 | 26.9 | HIGH |
| Auckland | T20 | 312 | 297 | 18 | 5.7 | 16.5 | MEDIUM |
| Otago | T20 | 294 | 264 | 17 | 5.4 | 15.5 | MEDIUM |
| Canterbury | T20 | 282 | 244 | 15 | 5.2 | 16.3 | MEDIUM |
| India | ODI | 277 | 230 | 13 | 5.0 | 17.7 | MEDIUM |
| Central Districts | T20 | 276 | 251 | 17 | 5.5 | 14.8 | MEDIUM |
| Northern Districts | T20 | 264 | 276 | 11 | 6.3 | 25.1 | MEDIUM |
| England | T20 | 228 | 308 | 3 | 8.1 | 102.7 | MEDIUM |
| Australia | ODI | 186 | 137 | 2 | 4.4 | 68.5 | MEDIUM |
| South Africa | T20 | 162 | 186 | 10 | 6.9 | 18.6 | MEDIUM |
| Sri Lanka | ODI | 160 | 66 | 4 | 2.5 | 16.5 | MEDIUM |
| West Indies | ODI | 156 | 101 | 7 | 3.9 | 14.4 | MEDIUM |
| Bangladesh | ODI | 138 | 67 | 5 | 2.9 | 13.4 | LOW |
| South Africa | ODI | 138 | 105 | 2 | 4.6 | 52.5 | LOW |
| Pakistan | ODI | 132 | 97 | 2 | 4.4 | 48.5 | LOW |
| Australia | T20 | 108 | 167 | 2 | 9.3 | 83.5 | LOW |
| Sri Lanka | T20 | 72 | 78 | 5 | 6.5 | 15.6 | LOW |
| Zimbabwe | T20 | 63 | 43 | 5 | 4.1 | 8.6 | LOW |
| West Indies | T20 | 60 | 35 | 5 | 3.5 | 7.0 | LOW |
| Bangladesh | T20 | 48 | 33 | 0 | 4.1 | — | LOW |
| Pakistan | T20 | 44 | 60 | 0 | 8.2 | — | LOW |
| India | T20 | 42 | 33 | 2 | 4.7 | 16.5 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Basin Reserve, Wellington | T20 | 22 | 377 | 313 | 22.2 | 120.4 | 14.7 | 33.5 | HIGH |
| Hagley Oval, Christchurch | T20 | 6 | 90 | 64 | 22.5 | 140.6 | 17.2 | 28.1 | LOW |
| Seddon Park, Hamilton | T20 | 2 | 75 | 49 | 75.0 | 153.1 | 20.4 | 26.5 | LOW |
| Eden Park Outer Oval, Auckland | T20 | 4 | 41 | 48 | 13.7 | 85.4 | 6.3 | 39.6 | LOW |
| Saxton Oval, Nelson | ODI | 2 | 44 | 47 | 22.0 | 93.6 | 6.4 | 42.6 | LOW |
| Saxton Oval, Nelson | T20 | 2 | 60 | 47 | 30.0 | 127.7 | 12.8 | 27.7 | LOW |
| University Oval, Dunedin | T20 | 4 | 61 | 44 | 30.5 | 138.6 | 18.2 | 34.1 | LOW |
| The Rose Bowl, Southampton | T20 | 4 | 51 | 38 | 51.0 | 134.2 | 15.8 | 21.1 | LOW |
| Bay Oval, Mount Maunganui | ODI | 3 | 48 | 34 | 16.0 | 141.2 | 20.6 | 41.2 | LOW |
| Bay Oval, Mount Maunganui | T20 | 4 | 42 | 32 | 14.0 | 131.3 | 21.9 | 34.4 | LOW |
| University Oval | ODI | 1 | 28 | 30 | 28.0 | 93.3 | 10.0 | 50.0 | LOW |
Bowling
| Basin Reserve, Wellington | T20 | 552 | 509 | 36 | 5.5 | 14.1 | HIGH |
| Seddon Park, Hamilton | ODI | 201 | 152 | 6 | 4.5 | 25.3 | MEDIUM |
| Basin Reserve | T20 | 198 | 208 | 6 | 6.3 | 34.7 | MEDIUM |
| Hagley Oval, Christchurch | T20 | 198 | 191 | 6 | 5.8 | 31.8 | MEDIUM |
| John Davies Oval, Queenstown | ODI | 172 | 128 | 8 | 4.5 | 16.0 | MEDIUM |
| Basin Reserve, Wellington | ODI | 168 | 105 | 6 | 3.8 | 17.5 | MEDIUM |
| Bay Oval, Mount Maunganui | ODI | 150 | 116 | 3 | 4.6 | 38.7 | MEDIUM |
| Seddon Park, Hamilton | T20 | 129 | 125 | 9 | 5.8 | 13.9 | LOW |
| Saxton Oval, Nelson | ODI | 120 | 45 | 3 | 2.3 | 15.0 | LOW |
| Eden Park Outer Oval, Auckland | T20 | 120 | 95 | 5 | 4.8 | 19.0 | LOW |
| Narendra Modi Stadium, Ahmedabad | ODI | 111 | 98 | 5 | 5.3 | 19.6 | LOW |
| University Oval, Dunedin | T20 | 104 | 106 | 3 | 6.1 | 35.3 | LOW |
| Sir Vivian Richards Stadium, North Sound, Antigua | ODI | 96 | 58 | 5 | 3.6 | 11.6 | LOW |
| Bay Oval, Mount Maunganui | T20 | 96 | 98 | 5 | 6.1 | 19.6 | LOW |
| John Davies Oval, Queenstown | T20 | 90 | 92 | 4 | 6.1 | 23.0 | LOW |
| McLean Park, Napier | ODI | 88 | 41 | 2 | 2.8 | 20.5 | LOW |
| County Ground, New Road, Worcester | ODI | 87 | 65 | 0 | 4.5 | — | LOW |
| Hagley Oval, Christchurch | ODI | 84 | 61 | 1 | 4.4 | 61.0 | LOW |
| University Oval | ODI | 84 | 50 | 3 | 3.6 | 16.7 | LOW |
| The Rose Bowl, Southampton | T20 | 78 | 90 | 2 | 6.9 | 45.0 | LOW |
| County Ground, Derby | ODI | 60 | 47 | 0 | 4.7 | — | LOW |
| Eden Park, Auckland | ODI | 60 | 36 | 2 | 3.6 | 18.0 | LOW |
| Senwes Park, Potchefstroom | ODI | 60 | 47 | 2 | 4.7 | 23.5 | LOW |
| Boland Park, Paarl | T20 | 60 | 63 | 2 | 6.3 | 31.5 | LOW |
| Eden Park, Auckland | T20 | 60 | 79 | 2 | 7.9 | 39.5 | LOW |
| County Ground, Bristol | ODI | 57 | 42 | 3 | 4.4 | 14.0 | LOW |
| Bay Oval | ODI | 48 | 30 | 1 | 3.8 | 30.0 | LOW |
| Eden Park Outer Oval | T20 | 48 | 54 | 3 | 6.8 | 18.0 | LOW |
| Fitzherbert Park, Palmerston North | T20 | 48 | 43 | 4 | 5.4 | 10.8 | LOW |
| Saxton Oval, Nelson | T20 | 48 | 34 | 3 | 4.3 | 11.3 | LOW |
| Sky Stadium, Wellington | T20 | 48 | 59 | 3 | 7.4 | 19.7 | LOW |
| City Oval, Pietermaritzburg | ODI | 36 | 35 | 0 | 5.8 | — | LOW |
| Sir Vivian Richards Stadium, North Sound, Antigua | T20 | 36 | 18 | 3 | 3.0 | 6.0 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 71 | 977 | 791 | 20.4 | 123.5 | 14.8 | 32.6 | HIGH |
| Unknown | ODI | 28 | 276 | 260 | 13.1 | 106.2 | 13.1 | 44.2 | MEDIUM |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 2297 | 2330 | 110 | 6.1 | 21.2 | HIGH |
| Unknown | ODI | 1742 | 1206 | 50 | 4.2 | 24.1 | HIGH |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 34 | 479 | 424 | 26.6 | 113.0 | 13.4 | 36.6 | HIGH |
| death | T20 | 51 | 463 | 322 | 16.5 | 143.8 | 17.1 | 24.2 | HIGH |
| death | ODI | 21 | 192 | 168 | 11.3 | 114.3 | 14.3 | 41.1 | MEDIUM |
| middle | ODI | 12 | 84 | 92 | 21.0 | 91.3 | 10.9 | 50.0 | LOW |
| powerplay | T20 | 9 | 35 | 45 | 17.5 | 77.8 | 11.1 | 55.6 | LOW |
Bowling
| powerplay | T20 | 1338 | 1246 | 48 | 5.6 | 26.0 | HIGH |
| powerplay | ODI | 828 | 583 | 21 | 4.2 | 27.8 | HIGH |
| middle | ODI | 655 | 428 | 15 | 3.9 | 28.5 | HIGH |
| death | T20 | 497 | 593 | 45 | 7.2 | 13.2 | HIGH |
| middle | T20 | 462 | 491 | 17 | 6.4 | 28.9 | HIGH |
| death | ODI | 259 | 195 | 14 | 4.5 | 13.9 | MEDIUM |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| SPIN | T20 | 61 | 607 | 509 | 18.4 | 119.3 | 13.8 | 33.4 | HIGH |
| PACE | T20 | 44 | 268 | 209 | 24.4 | 128.2 | 16.3 | 32.5 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | ODI | 24 | 139 | 165 | 11.6 | 84.2 | 9.1 | 52.1 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 17 | 102 | 73 | 25.5 | 139.7 | 17.8 | 27.4 | LOW |
| PACE | ODI | 16 | 108 | 72 | 15.4 | 150.0 | 20.8 | 29.2 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.